Publication Cover
Rethinking Marxism
A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society
Volume 30, 2018 - Issue 2
949
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Neoliberalism and the Right to Be Lazy: Inactivity as Resistance in Lazzarato and Agamben

References

  • Abbott, M. 2014. The figure of this world: Agamben and the question of political ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 1999. Potentialities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2000. Means without end: Notes on politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2005a. State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2005b. The time that remains. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2007a. Profanations. New York: Zone Books.
  • Agamben, G. 2007b. The work of man. In Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and life, ed. M. Calarco and S. DeCaroli, 1–10. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2011. Nudities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2013. The highest poverty: Monastic rules and form-of-life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agamben, G. 2015. Le feu et le récit. Paris: Editions Payot and Rivages.
  • Barkan, J. 2009. Use beyond value: Giorgio Agamben and a critique of capitalism. Rethinking Marxism 21 (2): 243–59. doi: 10.1080/08935690902743450
  • Berardi, F. [Bifo]. 2009. The soul at work. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Berardi, F. [Bifo]. 2012. The uprising: On poetry and finance. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Bertozzi, A. 2007. Thoughts in potentiality: Provisional reflections on Agamben’s understanding of potentiality and its relevance for theology and politics. Philosophy Today 51 (3): 290–302. doi: 10.5840/philtoday200751335
  • Bröckling, U. 2016. The entrepreneurial self. London: SAGE.
  • Christiaens, T. 2015. De wereld is alles wat het geval kan zijn: Agambens metafysische en politieke interpretatie van potentialiteit bij Aristoteles. De Uil van Minerva 28 (2): 113–32.
  • Christiaens, T. 2017. Debt. In 50 key terms in contemporary cultural theory, ed S. De Cauwer, J. De Bloois, and A. Masschelein. Kalmthout, Belg.: Pelckmans Pro.
  • Crary, J. 2014. 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep. London: Verso.
  • Davies, W. 2017. The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. London: SAGE.
  • De Cauter, L. 2012. Entropic empire. Amsterdam: nai010 publishers.
  • Debord, G. 1995. The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.
  • Duchamp, M. 1976. Duchamp du signe. Paris: Flammarion.
  • Ehrenberg, A. 1991. Le culte de performance. Paris: Callman-Levy.
  • Foucault, M. 2008. The birth of biopolitics. London: MacMillan.
  • Gillies, D. 2013. Agile bodies: A new imperative in neoliberal governance. Journal of Education Policy 54 (1): 207–23.
  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2001. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Krisis-Gruppe. 1999. Manifesto against labour. Krisis: Kritik der Warengesellschaft, 31 December. http://www.krisis.org/1999/manifesto-against-labour.
  • Lazzarato, M. 2004. Les révolutions du capitalisme. Paris: Les Prairies Ordinaires.
  • Lazzarato, M. 2012. The making of the indebted man. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Lazzarato, M. 2014a. Marcel Duchamp et le refus du travail. Paris: Les Prairies Ordinaires.
  • Lazzarato, M. 2014b. Signs and machines. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Lazzarato, M. 2015. Governing by debt. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Lievens, M., and A. Kenis. 2015. The limits of the green economy. London: Routledge.
  • Marazzi, C. 2011. Dyslexia and the economy. Angelaki 16 (3): 19–32. doi: 10.1080/0969725X.2011.621216
  • Micali, S. 2010. The capitalistic cult of performance. Philosophy Today 54 (4): 379–91. doi: 10.5840/philtoday20105445
  • Mills, C. 2008. The philosophy of Agamben. London: Routledge.
  • Roberts, J. 2007. The intangibilities of form: Skill and deskilling in art after the readymade. London: Verso.
  • Schumpeter: In praise of laziness. 2013. Economist, 17 August, 58.
  • Schumpeter, J. 2008. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.
  • Shukaitis, S. 2014. Learning not to labor. Rethinking Marxism 26 (2): 193–205. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2014.888835
  • Stiegler, B. 2009. Acting out. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Stilinovic, M. 1998. In praise of laziness. Moscow Art Magazine, no. 22, 25–6.
  • Taylor, C. 2014. The refusal to work: From the postemancipation Caribbean to post-Fordist empire. Small Axe 44 (July): 1–17. doi: 10.1215/07990537-2739812
  • Toscano, A. 2011. Divine management: Critical remarks on Giorgio Agamben’s The kingdom and the glory. Angelaki 16 (3): 125–36. doi: 10.1080/0969725X.2011.621226
  • Virno, P. 1991. Cultura e produzione sul palcoscenico. In I situazionisti, ed. G. Agamben, G. E. Debord, E. Ghezzi, L. Passerini, A. Piccinini, F. Poli, F. Scarpelli, et al., 19–26. Rome: Manifestolibri.
  • Virno, P. 2004. A grammar of the multitude. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Virno, P. 2015. Déjà vu and the end of history. London: Verso.
  • Watkin, W. 2013. Agamben and indifference. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Whyte, J. 2009. “I would prefer not to”: Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby and the potentiality of the law. Law Critique, no. 20: 309–24. doi: 10.1007/s10978-009-9059-9
  • Whyte, J. 2013. Catastrophe and redemption. New York: SUNY Press.
  • Zartaloudis, T. 2010. Giorgio Agamben: Power, law and the uses of criticism. London: Routledge.
  • Ziarek, E. 2008. Bare life on strike: Notes on the biopolitics of race and gender. South Atlantic Quarterly 107 (1): 89–105. doi: 10.1215/00382876-2007-057

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.