Deconstructing the Discourse of Self-Corrective Intellectual Property Markets

References

• Amariglio, J., and A. Callari. 1989. “Marxian Value Theory and the Problem of the Subject: The Role of Commodity Fetishism.” Rethinking Marxism 2 (2): 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Band, J., and J. Gerafi. 2013. “Profitability of Copyright Intensive Industries.” InfoJustice working papers. http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Profitability-of-Copyright-Industries.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera, L. 2013. “Performing the Court: Public Hearings and the Politics of Judicial Transparency in Argentina.” Political and Legal Anthropology Review 36 (2): 326–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• BASCAP and INTA (Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Piracy and International Trademark Association). 2017. The Economic Impacts of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Brussels: Frontier Economics. https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/02/ICC-BASCAP-Frontier-report-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M. 2009. “Class and Capital in Peer Production.” Capital & Class 33 (1): 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M. (2006) 2020. “The Political Economy of Peer Production.” Accessed 11 November 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237720052_The_Political_Economy_of_Peer_Production.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. J., and D. L. Prychitko, eds. 1994. The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. 2016. “Who’s Downloading Pirated Papers? Everyone.” ScienceMag, 28 April. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone.
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., and D. K. Levine. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A., J. Calvert, and P. B. Joly. 2011. “From Protecting Texts to Protecting Objects in Biotechnology and Software: A Tale of Changes of Ontological Assumptions in Intellectual Property Protection.” Economy and Society 40 (4): 611–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2010. “Performative Agency.” Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 147–61.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and J. Law. 1997. “After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 22 (2): 165–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton, D. W. 1989. “The Theory and the Facts of How Markets Clear: Is Industrial Organization Valuable for Understanding Macroeconomics?” In vol. 1 of Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, 909–46. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Charnock, R. 2009. “Overruling as a Speech Act: Performativity and Normative Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 401–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. 2012. “Talkin’ ’Bout a Revolution: The Social, Political, and Fantasmatic Logics of Education Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (2): 173–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2014. “Capitalism as a Discursive System?” Critical Discourse Studies 11 (3): 257–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. H. 2003. “How Judges Overrule—Speech Act Theory and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis. Yale Law Journal 113 (2): 493–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebeling, R. 1999. “Human Action, Ideal Types, and the Market Process: Alfred Schutz and the Austrian Economists.” In Schutzian Social Science, ed. L. Embree, 115–34. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. A Single Market for Intellectual Property Rights: Boosting Creativity and Innovation to Provide Economic Growth, High Quality Jobs and First Class Products and Services in Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0287&from=en.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. 2006. “Trial Discourse and Judicial Decision-Making: Constraining the Boundaries of Gendered Identities.” In Speaking Out, ed. J. Baxter, 139–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frow, J. 1994. “Timeshift: Technologies of Reproduction and Intellectual Property.” Economy and Society 23 (3): 291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. 2001. “The Grip of Ideology: A Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 6 (2): 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. 2008. “Ideological Fantasy at Work.” Journal of Political Ideologies 13 (3): 275–96.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. 2012. “The Place of the Fantasy in a Critical Political Economy: The Case of Market Boundaries.” Cardozo Law Review 33 (6): 2373–411.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and D. Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and Y. Stavrakakis. 2008. “Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political Theory.” Subjectivity 24 (1): 256–74.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., R. Klimecki, and H. Willmott. 2015. “Logics in Policy and Practice: A Critical Nodal Analysis of the UK Banking Reform Process.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (4): 393–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., E. Speed, and K. West. 2015. “Logics of Marginalisation in Health and Social Care Reform: Integration, Choice, and Provider-Blind Provision.” Critical Social Policy 35 (1): 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowan, M. 2002. “Requiem for Napster.” PC World, 18 May. https://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/22380/requiem_napster.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., and D. Howarth. 2008. “Populism, Localism and Environmental Politics: The Logic and Rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign.” Planning Theory 7 (2): 123–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, R. 1997. “Patently Unfair: Researcher Scoops World with Discovery, Ends Up on Chain Gang.” Chicago Tribune, 21 March. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-03-21/features/9703210317_1_cat-litter-chain-gang-petr-taborsky.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B. 2015. “Fantasies of Subjugation: A Discourse Theoretical Account of British Policy on the European Union.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (2): 139–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 1998. “Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Research Strategies in the Social Sciences: A Guide to New Approaches, ed. E. Scarbrough and E. Tanenbaum, 268–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., A. Norval, and Y. Stavrakakis, eds. 2000. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies, and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA, ITU, UNESCO, UNOOSA, and WIPO (International Atomic Energy Agency; United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization; United Nations Office for Outer Space; and World Intellectual Property Organization). 2012. Science, Technology and Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights: The Vision for Development. UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. https:www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Think%20Pieces/11_ips_science_innovation_technology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Idris, K., and H. Arai. 2006. The Intellectual Property-Conscious Nation: Mapping the Path from Developing to Developed. Geneva: WIPO.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2007. “Knowledge as a Fictitious Commodity: Insights and Limits of a Polanyian Analysis. In Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century: Market Economy as a Political Project, ed. A. Buğra and K. Ağartan, 115–34. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Karaganis, J., ed. 2011. Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. Social Sciences Research Council. http://piracy.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MPEE-PDF-1.0.4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karaganis, J., and L. Renkema. 2013. Copy Culture in the US and Germany. New York: The American Assembly, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakis, V., and M. Bauwens. 2014. Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, W. M., and R. A. Posner. 2003. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, D., ed. 1991. Economics and Hermeneutics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. 2003. “An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics.” Social Studies of Science 33 (6): 831–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., and Y. Millo. 2003. “Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (1): 107–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A., and I. Oransky. 2017. “For Sharing a Scientific Paper, a Young Researcher Faces Jail Time.” Statnews, 12 May. https://www.statnews.com/2017/05/12/copyright-paper-science-jail.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1867) 1982. Capital. Vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., and E. Nik-Khah. 2017. The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information: The History of Information in Modern Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee, F., and K. Strumpf. 2007. “The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 115 (1): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee, F., and K. Strumpf. 2010. “File Sharing and Copyright.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 10 (1): 19–55.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2008. The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD and EUIPO (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and EU Intellectual Property Organization). 2016. Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264252653-en.pdf?expires=1605567563&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=85AF6804CA043724F0F2CEE1C390C00C.
   Google Scholar
• Peukert, A. 2017. “Intellectual Property and Development—Narratives and Their Empirical Validity.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 20 (1–2): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1977. The Livelihood of Man. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, M. J. 1996. Contested Commodities: The Trouble with Trade in Sex, Children, Body Parts, and Other Things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Remling, E. 2018. “Logics, Assumptions and Genre Chains: A Framework for Poststructuralist Policy Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. 2014. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M.J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776) 1966. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 2 vols. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, R. 2015. “If You Think Piracy Is Decreasing, You Haven’t Looked at the Data.” Digital Music News, 16 July. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2015/07/16/if-you-think-piracy-is-decreasing-you-havent-looked-at-the-data-2.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, J. 2012. “A Marriage of Convenience: World Economy and Intellectual Property from 1990 to 2012.” AIPLA Quarterly Journal 40 (4): 633–83.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, R. A., and T. N. Rotta. 2012. “Valueless Knowledge-Commodities and Financialization: Productive and Financial Dimensions of Capital Autonomization.” Review of Radical Political Economics 44 (4): 448–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomšič, S. 2015. The Capitalist Unconscious: Marx and Lacan. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 1999. New Theories of Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wajsman, N., C. A. Burgos, and C. Davies. 2016. “The Economic Cost of IPR Infringement in the Recorded Music Industry.” European Union Intellectual Property Office. https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/resources/research-and-studies/ip_infringement/study7/Music_industry_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, J. 2011. “Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie? The Supply of New Recorded Music since Napster.” NBER Working Paper 16882.
   Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, J. 2017. “How Digitization Has Created a Golden Age of Music, Movies, Books, and Television.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (3): 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, M., and M. Mabe. 2015. The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, M. 2003. Marxism and Media Studies: Key Concepts and Contemporary Trends. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953) 2009. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). 2004. WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Geneva: WIPO.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). 2018. What Is Intellectual Property? Geneva: WIPO. Accessed 15 July 2018. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/intproperty/450/wipo_pub_450.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zoettl, P. A. 2016. “Let Justice Be Done: A Performative View on Portuguese Criminal Trial Procedures.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 13 (4): 400–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar