Revisiting the Calculation Debate: A Call for a Multiscale Approach

References

• Adaman, F. 2017. “Scaling in Polanyi: Reconsidering the Local in the Age of Neoliberalism.” In “De-politicization in the Neoliberal Era,” special issue, Partecipazione e Conflitto 10 (2): 589–612.
   Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and P. Devine. 1996. “The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Socialists.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 20 (5): 523–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and P. Devine. 1997. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism.” New Left Review I/221 (January–February): 54–80.
   Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and P. Devine. 2001. “Participatory Planning as a Deliberative Democratic Process: A Response to Hodgson’s Critique.” Economy and Society 30 (2): 229–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and P. Devine. 2002. “On the Theory of Entrepreneurship.” Review of Political Economy 14 (3): 329–55.
   Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and P. Devine. 2006. “The Promise of Participatory Planning: A Rejoinder to Hodgson.” Economy and Society 35 (1): 141–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and P. Devine. 2017. “Democracy, Participation and Social Planning.” In Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics: Nature and Society, ed. C. Spash, 517–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., P. Devine, and B. Özkaynak. 2007. “(Re)embedding the Economy in Society and Nature.” In Karl Polanyi: New Perspectives on the Place of the Economy in Society, ed. M. Harvey, R. Ramlogan, and S. Randles, 78–93. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akbulut, B. 2017. “Commons.” In Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics: Nature and Society, ed. C. Spash, 395–403. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akbulut, B. 2021. “Degrowth.” Rethinking Marxism 33 (1): 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut, B., and F. Adaman. 2020. “The Ecological Economics of Economic Democracy.” Ecological Economics, no. 176.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M. 2003. Parecon: Life after Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., and R. Hahnel. 1991. Looking Forward: Participatory Economics for the Twenty First Century. Boston: South End.
   Google Scholar
• Albritton, R., S. Bell, J. R. Bell, and R. Westra. 2012. New Socialisms: Futures beyond Globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvaredo, F., L. Chancel, T. Piketty, E. Saez, and G. Zucman. 2018. World Inequality Report 2018. Harvard, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, M. 2020. “Lessons from the COVID-19 Crisis for Climate Change Politics.” Bliss, 2 April. https://issblog.nl/2020/04/02/covid-19-lessons-from-the-covid-19-crisis-for-climate-change-politics-by-murat-arsel.
   Google Scholar
• Agustin, O. G. 2020. “New Municipalism as Space for Solidarity: How Can New Municipalism Develop a Progressive Localism and Forge Translocal Solidarities?” Soundings, no. 74: 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. 2020. “A Genealogy of Economic Growth as Ideology and Cold War Core State Imperative.” New Political Economy 25 (1): 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benanav, A. 2020. “How to Make a Pencil.” Logic, no. 12. https://logicmag.io/commons/how-to-make-a-pencil/.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. 1991. “Fin de Siècle: Socialism after the Crash.” New Left Review I/185 (January–February): 5–66.
   Google Scholar
• Block, F. 2001. Introduction to The Great Transformation, by K. Polanyi, xviii–xxxviii. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bockman, J. 2011. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bockman, J. 2016. “Socialism and the Embedded Economy.” Theory and Society 45 (5): 385–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, S. 1992. “Austrian Economics and the Theory of Entrepreneurship: Israel M. Kirzner Interviewed by Stephan Boehm on 2 May 1989.” Review of Political Economy 4 (1): 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Boettke, P. 2000. Socialism and the Market: The Socialist Calculation Debate Revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boillat, S., J.-F. Gerber, and F. R. Funes-Monzote. 2012. “What Economic Democracy for Degrowth? Some Comments on the Contribution of Socialist Models and Cuban Agroecology.” Futures 44 (6): 600–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1993. “The Democratic Firm: An Agency-Theoretic Evaluation.” In Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability, and Efficiency, ed. S. Bowles, H. Gintis, and B. Gustafsson, 13–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., C. Görg, and M. Wissen. 2020. “Overcoming Neoliberal Globalization: Social-Ecological Transformation from a Polanyian Perspective and Beyond.” Globalizations 17 (1): 161–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B. 2015. “Futures: Imagining Socioecological Transformation—An Introduction.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2): 239–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechin, R. S., and W. H. Fenner. 2017. “Karl Polanyi’s Environmental Sociology: A Primer.” Environmental Sociology 3 (4): 404–13.
   Google Scholar
• Brie, M. 2017. Karl Polanyi in Dialogue. Montreal: Black Rose.
   Google Scholar
• Brie, M., and C. Thomasberger, eds. 2018. Karl Polanyi’s Vision of a Socialist Transformation. Montreal: Black Rose.
   Google Scholar
• Brus, W., and K. Laski. 1989. From Marx to the Market: Socialism in Search for an Economic System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burczak, T. A. 2006. Socialism after Hayek. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 2020. “Two in Five UK Adults Feel Lonelier under Lockdown, Finds Survey.” The Guardian, 18 June. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jun/19/two-in-five-uk-adults-feel-lonelier-under-lockdown-finds-survey.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., and M. Savage. 2020. “Therapists and Teachers Warn of Looming Mental Health Crisis.” The Guardian, 18 July. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/19/therapists-and-teachers-warn-of-looming-mental-health-crisis.
   Google Scholar
• Cangiani, M. 2011. “Karl Polanyi’s Institutional Theory: Market Society and Its ‘Disembedded’ Economy.” Journal of Economic Issues 45 (1): 177–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cat, J. 2019. “Otto Neurath.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/neurath.
   Google Scholar
• Chaloupek, G. 2007. “Otto Neurath’s Concepts of Socialization and Economic Calculation and His Socialist Critics.” In Otto Neurath’s Economics in Context, ed. E. Nemeth, S. W. Schmitz, and T. E. Uebel, 61–76. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, P. 2018. Socialism and Commodity Production: Essay in Marx Revival. Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Cockshott, W. P. 2010. “Von Mises, Kantorovich and In-Natura Calculation.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies 7 (1): 167–99.
   Google Scholar
• Cockshott, W. P., and A. Cottrell. 1993. Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham, UK: Spokesman.
   Google Scholar
• Cockshott, W. P., A. Cottrell, and H. Dieterich. 2010. “Transition to Socialism in the European Union.” World Review of Political Economy 1 (2): 275–89.
   Google Scholar
• Corneo, G. 2017. Is Capitalism Obsolete? A Journey through Alternative Economic Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. 2020. The Green New Deal and Beyond: Ending the Climate Emergency while We Still Can. San Francisco: City Lights.
   Google Scholar
• Cumbers, A. 2013. “Making Space for Public Ownership: The Re-municipalisation of Public Services through Grassroots Struggle and Local State Action.” Planning Theory and Practice 14 (4): 547–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G. 2010. Karl Polanyi: The Limits of the Market. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, G. 2016. Reconstructing Polanyi: Excavation and Critique. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. 2015. “The Return of Social Government: From ‘Socialist Calculation’ to ‘Social Analytics.’” European Journal of Social Theory 18 (4): 431–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. (1988) 2010. Democracy and Economic Planning: The Political Economy of a Self-Governing Society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2002. “Participatory Planning through Negotiated Coordination.” Science & Society 66 (1): 72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2006. “Karl Polanyi.” Renewal 14 (4): 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2007. Review of Parecon: Life after Capitalism, by M. Albert. Historical Materialism 15 (2): 210–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2018. “Democratic Socialist Planning.” In The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx, ed. M. Vidal, T. Smith, T. Rotta, and P. Prew, 773–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2019a. “Doing Justice to Karl Polanyi.” Review of Karl Polanyi: A Life on the Left; Karl Polanyi: The Hungarian writings; and Reconstructing Karl Polanyi: Excavation and Critique, by G. Dale.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 30 (2): 276–80.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2019b. “Planning for Freedom.” In Karl Polanyi’s Vision of a Socialist Transformation, ed. M. Brie and C. Thomasberger, 209–20. Montreal: Black Rose.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2022a. “Reflections.” Science & Society 86 (2): 140–45.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 2022b. “Ecosocialist Economics.” In The Routledge Handbook on Ecosocialism, ed. S. Engel-Di Mauro, M. Lowy, A. Isla, L. Brownhill, T. Turner, and T. Giacomini, 271–79. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P., and D. Purdy. 2009. “Feelbad Britain and the Future of the Left.” Red Pepper, 9 June. https://www.redpepper.org.uk/Feelbad-Britain-and-the-future-of.
   Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. 1935. “Economic Theory and Socialist Economy: A Reply.” Review of Economic Studies 2 (2): 144–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. 1969. Welfare Economics and the Economics of Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, D. 1988. “Market Socialism or the Socialization of the Market?” New Left Review I/172 (November–December): 3–44.
   Google Scholar
• Estrin, S. 1989. “Workers’ Cooperatives: Their Merits and Their Limitations.” In Market Socialism, ed. J. Le Grand and S. Estrin, 165–92. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, D., A. Ince, D. Mackinnon, K. Strauss, and A. Cumbers. 2012. “Progressive Localism and the Construction of Political Alternatives.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (2): 177–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 2010. “The Uses of Neoliberalism.” Antipode 41 (1): 166–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, N., and E. Sarmiento. 2020. “Troubling Power: An Introduction to a Special Issue on Power in Community Economies.” Rethinking Marxism 32 (3): 281–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-F. 2016. “The Legacy of K. William Kapp.” Development and Change 47 (4): 902–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-F., and A. Scheidel. 2018. “In Search of Substantive Economics: Comparing Today’s Two Major Socio-Metabolic Approaches to the Economy—MEFA and MuSIASEM.” Ecological Economics, no. 144: 186–94.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., J. Cameron, and S. Healy. 2013. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide to Transforming Our Communities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., and M. O’Neill. 2019. “Socialism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socialism.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., and B. Martin-López. 2015. “Ecological Economics Perspectives on Ecosystem Services Valuation.” In Handbook of Ecological Economics, ed. J. Martinez-Alier and R. Muradian, 260–82. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. 2019. “Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework.” Political Quarterly 90 (3): 534–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. 2006. “Commensurability and Beyond: From Mises and Neurath to the Future of the Socialist Calculation Debate.” Economy and Society 35 (1): 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan, J., and M. O’Neill. 2019. “From Community Wealth Building to System Change: Local Roots for Economic Transformation.” IPPR Progressive Review 25 (2): 382–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hahnel, R. 2012. Of the People, by the People: The Case for a Participatory Economy. Portland, Ore.: Soapbox.
   Google Scholar
• Hahnel, R. 2019. “Integrating Investment and Annual Planning.” Review of Radical Political Economy 52 (2): 222–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel, R. 2021. Democratic Economic Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. 2011. “Reclaim the Common in Communism.” The Guardian, 3 February. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/feb/03/communism-capitalism-socialism-property.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2020. “Anti-capitalist Politics in the Time of COVID-19.” Jacobin, 20 March. https://jacobinmag.com/2020/03/david-harvey-coronavirus-political-economy-disruptions.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. von. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, S. 2014. “Psychoanalysis and the Geography of the Anthropocene: Fantasy, Oil Addiction and the Politics of Global Warming.” In Psychoanalytic Geographies, ed. S. Pile and P. Kingsbury, 181–96. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J., and G. Kallis. 2020. “Is Green Growth Possible?” New Political Economy 25 (4): 469–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 1998. “Socialism against Markets? A Critique of Two Recent Proposals.” Economy and Society 27 (4): 407–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2005. “The Limits to Participatory Planning: A Reply to Adaman and Devine.” Economy and Society 34 (1): 141–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2016. “Some Limitations of the Socialist Calculation Debate.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (1): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2017. “Karl Polanyi on Economy and Society: A Critical Analysis of Core Concepts.” Review of Social Economy 75 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. 2010. Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. 2012. “Problems and Opportunities in Polanyian Analysis Today.” Economy and Society 41 (3): 468–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. 2014. “Introduction: A Post-Polanyian Political Economy for Our Times.” Economy and Society 43 (4): 525–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwicz, L. 2008. “But Who Will Guard the Guardians?” American Economic Review 98 (3): 577–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1994. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., and N.-L. Sum. 2019. “Polanyi: Classical Moral Economist or Pioneer Cultural Political Economist?” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 44 (2): 153–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. 2020. “Towards a Just Economy: No Return to the 1930s.” Chartist, 8 July. https://www.chartist.org.uk/towards-a-just-economy-no-return-to-the-1930s.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and M. O’Donnell. 2018. Alternatives to Neoliberalism: Towards Equality and Democracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kawano, E. 2018. “Seven Ways to Build the Solidarity Economy.” Open Democracy, 4 September. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/seven-ways-to-build-solidarity-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2018. Degrowth. Newcastle, UK: Agenda.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjanson-Gural, D. 2011. “Value, Cooperatives, and Class Justice.” Rethinking Marxism 23 (3): 352–63.
   Google Scholar
• Laibman, D. 2002. “Democratic Coordination: Towards a Working Socialism for the New Century.” Science & Society 66 (1): 116–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laibman, D. 2006. “The Future within the Present: Seven Theses for a Robust Twenty-First-Century Socialism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 38 (3): 305–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, O., and F. Taylor. 1938. On the Economic Theory of Socialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liagouras, G. 2019. “Economic Growth, Happiness and Socialism: Durkheim’s Critique of Economic Reason and Beyond.” New Political Economy 24 (5): 659–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, L. 2010. “Uncertainty Markets and Carbon Markets: Variations on Polanyian Themes.” New Political Economy 15 (2): 225–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon-Callo, V. 2020. “Editors’ Introduction.” Rethinking Marxism 32 (3): 277–80.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M. 2020. “Critique of Political Economy: An Interview with David. F. Ruccio.” In Pandemic and the Crisis of Capitalism: A Rethinking Marxism Dossier, ed. Editorial Collective, 237–47. Brighton, Mass.: ReMarx.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M., and F. Adaman. 2014. “Neoliberal Reason and Its Forms: De-politicisation through Economisation.” Antipode 46 (3): 691–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., G. Munda, and J. O’Neill. 1998. “Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 26 (3): 277–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDuff, P. 2019. “Ending Climate Change Requires the End of Capitalism: Have We Got the Stomach for It?” The Guardian, 18 March. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/18/ending-climate-change-end-capitalism.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., and B. Blair. 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milonakis, D. 2003. “New Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation or Inspired Alchemy?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (1): 97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2018. “Polanyi vs. Hayek?” Globalizations 15 (7): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., and E. Nik-Khah. 2017. The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mises, L. von (1920) 1935. “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth.” In Collectivist Economic Planning, ed. F. Hayek, 87–130. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, G., and K. Stokke. 2000. “Participatory Development and Empowerment: The Dangers of Localism.” Third World Quarterly 21 (2): 247–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. 2020. “People Want a Greener, Happier World Now. But Our Politicians Have Other Ideas.” The Guardian, 22 July. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/21/greener-happier-world-politicians-boris-johnson-consumerism-planet.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. 2009. “Fundamental Theory of Institutions: A Lecture in Honor of Leo Hurwicz.” Review of Economic Design 13 (1): 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurath, O. (1919) 1973. Empiricism and Sociology. Ed. M. Neurath and R. S. Cohen. Dordrecht, Neth.: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, M., and J. P. Mateo. 2020. “Dynamic Efficiency in a Planned Economy: Innovation and Entrepreneurship without Markets.” Science & Society 84 (1): 42–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nove, A. 1983. The Economics of Feasible Socialism. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 1996. “Who Won the Socialist Calculate Debate?” History of Political Thought 17 (3): 431–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 1997. “Value Pluralism, Incommensurability and Institutions.” In Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment, ed. J. Foster, 75–8. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2006. “Knowledge, Planning, and Markets: A Missing Chapter in the Socialist Calculation Debates.” Economics & Philosophy 22 (1): 55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2007. “Pluralism and Economic Institutions.” In Otto Neurath’s Economics in Context, ed. E. Nemeth, S. W. Schmitz, and T. E. Uebel, 77–100. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2017. “Life Beyond Capital.” Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity Series on the Morality of Sustainable Prosperity, no. 6. https://cusp.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Life-beyond-capital-online.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2019. “From Socialist Calculation to Political Ecology.” In Marx200: The Significance of Marxism in the 21st Century, ed. J. McDonnell, V. Prashad, and M. Davis, 104–18. London: Praxis.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., and C. Spash. 2000. “Conceptions of Value in Environmental Decision-Making.” Environmental Values 9 (4): 521–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkaynak, B., F. Adaman, and P. Devine. 2012. “The Identity of Ecological Economics: Retrospects and Prospects.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (5): 1123–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., and T. Besley. 2019. “Citizen Science and Post-normal Science in a Post-truth Era: Democratising Knowledge; Socialising Responsibility.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (13): 1293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-first Century. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1922) 2016. “Socialist Accounting.” Trans. J. Bockman, A. Fischer, and D. Woodruff. Theory and Society 45 (2): 385–427.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944) 2001. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process.” In Trade and Market in the Early Empires, ed. K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, and H. W. Pearson, 243–69. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollin, R. 2018. “De-growth vs. a Green New Deal.” New Left Review, n.s., 112 (July–August): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, D. 2020. “An Anti-capitalist Manifesto for the Modern Day.” Perspectives. http://perspectives-unbound.scot/boo-1/4595080309.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. 1994. A Future for Socialism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. 2020. “What Is Socialism Today? Conceptions of a Cooperative Economy.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper no. 2220, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., January 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3524617.
   Google Scholar
• Ruccio, D. F. 2011a. “Cooperatives, Surplus, and the Social.” Rethinking Marxism 23 (3): 334–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ruccio, D. F. 2011b. Development and Globalization: A Marxian Class Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Samothrakis, S. 2020. “Open Loop In Natura Economic Planning.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified 14 May 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.01539.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandmo, A. 2015. “The Principal Problem in Political Economy: Income Distribution in the History of Economic Thought.” In Handbook of Income Distribution, ed. A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon, 3–65. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Screpanti, E. 2004. “Freedom and Social Goods: Rethinking Marx’s Theory of Communism.” Rethinking Marxism 16 (2): 185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Shenk, T. 2013. Maurice Dobb: Political Economist. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. 2015. Gramsci’s Political Thought: An Introduction. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 1994. Whither Socialism? Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., R. Gunderson, and B. Petersen. 2019. “Climate Change and the Polanyian Counter-movement: Carbon Markets or Degrowth?” New Political Economy 24 (1): 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, L., and S. Bliss. 2019. A Green New Deal for an Ecological Economy. http://unevenearth.org/2019/10/a-green-new-deal-for-an-ecological-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Tribe, K. 2015. The Economy of the Word: Language, History, and Economic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, M. 2018. Otto Neurath and the History of Economics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uebel, T. E. 2007. “Otto Neurath as an Austrian Economist: Behind the Scenes of the Early Socialist Calculation Debate.” In Otto Neurath’s Economics in Context, ed. E. Nemeth, S. W. Schmitz, and T. E. Uebel, 37–59. Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Uebel, T. E., and R. S. Cohen, eds. 2004. Economic Writings: Selections 1904–1945. By O. Neurath. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Vadén, T., V. Lähde, A. Majava, P. Järvensivu, T. Toivanen, E. Hakala, and J. T. Eronen. 2020. “Decoupling for Ecological Sustainability: A Categorisation and Review of Research Literature.” Environmental Science & Policy 112 (October): 236–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanberg, V. J. 2008. “On the Complementarity of Liberalism and Democracy: A Reading of F. A. Hayek and J. M. Buchanan.” Journal of Institutional Economics 4 (2): 139–61.
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2009. “An Institutional Analysis of Methods for Environmental Appraisal.” Ecological Economics 68 (8–9): 2207–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, K. I. 1980. “Economic Calculation under Socialism: The Austrian Contribution.” Economic Inquiry 18 (4): 535–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walras, L. (1874) 2010. Elements of Pure Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wanner, T. 2015. “The New ‘Passive Revolution’ of the Green Economy and Growth Discourse: Maintaining the ‘Sustainable Development’ of Neoliberal Capitalism.” New Political Economy 20 (1): 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. 2020. “Calculation and Conflict.” South Atlantic Quarterly 119 (1): 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, R. 2012. Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2021. The Global Risks Report 2021. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2016. “How to Think about (and Win) Socialism.” Jacobin, 27 April. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/04/erik-olin-wright-real-utopias-capitalism-socialism.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2019. How to Be an Anticapitalist in the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar