References
- Arizona Department of Education. (2006). Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS): Sample test grade 3. Phoeniz, AZ: Author.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Wise, A. E. (1985). Beyond standardization: State tests and school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 315–336.
- Eastwood, M., & Welsh, M. E. (2009). Do states inadvertently encourage “teaching to the test?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeast Educational Research Association, Rocky Hill, CT.
- Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2–7.
- Hill, H. C. (2001). Policy is not enough: Language and the interpretation of state standards. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 298–318.
- Koretz, D. M., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Testing for accountability in K–12. In R. L. Brennan ( Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 531–578). Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Lane, S., Parke, C. S., & Stone, C. A. (2002). The impact of a state performance-based assessment and accountability program on mathematics instruction and student learning: evidence from survey data and school performance. Educational Assesment, 8(4), 279–315.
- Madaus, G. F., & Clarke, M. (2001). The adverse impact of high-stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from 100 years of test data. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber ( Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
- Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(1), 14–22.
- No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
- Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.
- O’Day, J., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic school reform and educational opportunity. In S. H. Fuhrman ( Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system ( pp. 250–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
- Padilla, C., Woodward, K., Lash, A., Shields, P., & Laguarda, K. (2005). Evaluation of Title I accountability systems and school improvement efforts: Findings from 2002–03. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
- Popham, W. J. (2004). All about accountability: Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 82.
- Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48, 4–11.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Schorr, R. Y., Bulgar, S., Stickle Razze, J., Monfils, L. F., & Firestone, W. A. (2004). Teaching mathematics and science. In W. A. Firestone, L. F. Monfils, & R. Y. Schorr ( Eds.), The ambiguity of teaching to the test: Standards, assessment, and educational reform ( pp. 19–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Seeley, C. L.(2006). Teaching to the test. (NCTM News Bulletin). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=926
- Smith, M. L. (1991). Meanings of test preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 521–542.
- Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27.
- Stecher, B. M., Barron, S. L., Chun, T., & Ross, K. (2000). The effects of the Washington state school reform on schools and classrooms (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 525). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
- Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–245.
- Taylor, G., Shepard, L., Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers’ perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 588). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
- Yoon, B., & Resnick, L.B. (1998). Instructional validity, opportunity to learn and equity: New standards examinations for the California Mathematics Renaissance (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 484). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.