651
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Extension of IRT-Based Equating to the Dichotomous Testlet Response Theory Model

&

References

  • Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (1999). A bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika, 64, 153–168. doi:10.1007/BF02294533
  • DeMars, C. E. (2006). Application of the bi-factor multidimensional item response theory model to testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 145–168. doi:10.1111/jedm.2006.43.issue-2
  • Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423–436. doi:10.1007/BF02295430
  • Harris, D. J., & Crouse, J. D. (1993). A study of criteria used in equating. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 195–240. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0603_3
  • Keller, L., Swaminathan, H., & Sireci, S. G. (2003). Evaluating scoring procedures for context-dependent item sets. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 207–222. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1603_3
  • Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Lee, G., Kolen, M. J., Frisbie, D. A., & Ankenmann, R. D. (2001). Comparison of dichotomous and polytomous item response models in equating scores from tests composed of testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 357–372. doi:10.1177/01466210122032226
  • Li, Y., Bolt, D. M., & Fu, J. (2005). A test characteristic curve linking method for the testlet model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 340–356. doi:10.1177/0146621605276678
  • Li, Y., Bolt, D. M., & Fu, J. (2006). A comparison of alternative models for testlets. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 3–21. doi:10.1177/0146621605275414
  • Sireci, S. G., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237–247. doi:10.1111/jedm.1991.28.issue-3
  • Wainer, H., Bradlow, E. T., & Wang, X. (2007). Testlet response theory and its applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185–201. doi:10.1111/jedm.1987.24.issue-3
  • Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1996). How is reliability related to the quality of test scores? What is the effect of local dependence on reliability? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15, 22–29. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1996.tb00803.x
  • Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H. (2002). A general bayesian model for testlets: Theory and applications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 109–128. doi:10.1177/0146621602026001007
  • Wang, X., Bradlow, E. T., & Wainer, H. (2005). User’s guide for SCORIGHT (Version 3.0): A computer program for scoring tests built of testlets including a module for covariate analysis (ETS Research Report RR 04-49). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Yen, W. M. (1993). Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 187–213. doi:10.1111/jedm.1993.30.issue-3
  • Zenisky, A. L., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (2002). Identification and evaluation of local item dependencies in the Medical College Admissions Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 291–309. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01144.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.