Teachers’ use of learning progression-based formative assessment in water instruction

References

• Alonzo, A. C. (2011). Learning progressions that support formative assessment practices. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 9, 124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C. (this issue). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., & Elby, A. (2015). Physics teachers’ use of learning-progression-based assessment information to reason about student ideas and instructional responses. In A. C. Alonzo ( Chair), Affordances and constraints of learning progressions for informing teachers’ reasoning. Related paper set conducted at the NARST annual meeting, April Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95, 639–669. doi:10.1002/sce.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, B., Gunckel, K. L., Warnock, A., & Cano, A. (2012). Investigating water pathways in schoolyards. Green Teacher, 98(Winter), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Comparing American and Chinese students’ learning progression on carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Science Education International, 26(4), 439–462.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, J., Draney, K., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). Methodology issues in developing a learning progression-based assessment system. Paper presented at the NARST annual meeting, March Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Curriculum coherence and learning progressions. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 783–798). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E., Morrison, D., & Kroog, H. (2014). Investigating the link between learning progressions and classroom assessment. Science Education, 98(4), 640–673. doi:10.1002/sce.21122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1181–1210. doi:10.1002/tea.v49.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 982–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.v51.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267–291. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2012). Learning progressions to support ambitious teaching practices. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 405–433). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., Salinas, I., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 843–868. doi:10.1002/tea.v49.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, L., Anderson, C. W., Berkowitz, A., Moore, J. C., Schramm, J., & Simon, S. (2011). Development of a grade 6–12 learning progression for biodiversity: An overview of the approach, framework, and key findings. Paper presented at the NARST annual meeting, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Chief Council of State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. A., Wilson, M., Draney, K., & Tutunciyan, S. (2007). ConstructMap [computer program]. Berkeley: Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Center, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96, 927–959. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). Learning progressions: The whole world is NOT a stage. Science Education, 99(3), 432–437. doi:10.1002/sce.2015.99.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi‐year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio‐ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698. doi:10.1002/tea.v46:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255. doi:10.1177/0022487105285963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 497–523. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941. doi:10.1002/tea.21022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J., & Garnier, H. (2007). How five countries teach science. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., … Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 295–314. doi:10.1080/08957340802347647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., III, diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115–163. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London, England: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. doi:10.3102/0002831213476334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Research, theory and practice. 29‐42 New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures. An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why. Teachers College Record, 113, 1311–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar