Disentangling the Effects of Self Leader Perceptions and Ideal Leader Prototypes on Leader Judgments Using Loglinear Modeling With Latent Variables

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allgood, S. F., Thompson, N. J., Foti, R. J., & Robson, V. E. (2011, June). Sugar and spice: Gender variation in self-perceptions of leadership. Poster presented at the Ninth Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J. (2005). Leadership development in balance: Made/Born. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Team leadership, team development and effectiveness: Final report to the Eisenhower Fund. Binghamton: State University of New York at Binghamton, Center for Leadership Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ayman-Nolley, S., & Ayman, R. (2005). Children’s implicit theories of leadership. In B. Schyns & J. R. Meindl ( Eds.), The leadership horizon series: Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations (pp. 227–274). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, B. C., Lanza, S. T., & Collins, L. M. (2010). Modeling relations among discrete developmental processes: A general approach to associative latent transition analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 541–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, S. M., & Marchisio, G. (2011). Narcissism in organizational contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsten, M. K., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Follower beliefs in the co-production of leadership. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220, 210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 543–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader–member exchange: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 487–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2009). Egocentric pattern projection: How implicit personality theories recapitulate the geography of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronshaw, S. F., & Lord, R .G. (1987). Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCremer, D. (2006). Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow: A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan, J. P., & Komives, S. R. (2007). Developing leadership capacity in college students: Findings from a national study. A report from the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership. College Park, MD: National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D. (2003). The zealous self-affirmer: How and why the self lurks so pervasively behind social judgment. In S. J. Spencer ( Ed.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium ( Vol. 9, pp. 45–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Perie, M., & Story, A. L. (1991). Self-serving prototypes of social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 957–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 293–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki, O. & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of implicit leadership theories, leader–member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2010). Followers’ personality and the perception of transformational leadership: Further evidence for the similarity hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 21, 393–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, R. J., Bray, B. C., Thompson, N. J., & Allgood, S. F. (2012). Know thy self, know thy leader: Contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 702–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, R. J., Fraser, S. L, & Lord, R. G. (1982). Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 326–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, W. A. (1959). Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 24, 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagenaars, J. A. (1988). LCAG—Loglinear modelling with latent variables: A modified LISREL approach. In W. E. Saris & I. N. Gallhofer ( Eds.), Sociometric research: Data analysis ( Vol. 2, pp. 111–130). London, England: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenaars, J. A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables ( No. 07-094). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A., (2008). An examination of “nonleadership”: From laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1234–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Long, D. M. (2012). Individual differences in leadership. In D. Day & J. Antonakis, ( Eds.), The nature of leadership (2nd ed., pp. 179–217). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, T. (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 589–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1128–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B. S., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Identifying organizational faultlines with latent class cluster analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 32–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J. (2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & Phillips, J. S. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. In J. G. Hunt, U. Sekaran, & C. Schriesheim ( Eds.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views (pp. 104–121). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. A., Sulsky, L. M., & Brown, D. J. (2008). Leadership and perceiver cognition: Examining the role of self-identity in implicit leadership theories. Human Performance, 21, 333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. R., & Strain, L. M. (2007). Content and structure of the self. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer ( Eds.), The self in social psychology (pp. 51–73). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElwee, R. O., Dunning, D., Tan, P. L., & Hollman, S. (2001). Evaluating others: The role of who we are versus what we think traits mean. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J. (1987). On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 36, 318–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., Morizot, J., Boudrias, J. S., & Madore, I. (2011). A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 58–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus users’ guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Offermann, L. R., Kennedy, J. K., Jr., & Wirtz, P. W. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, P. G., Foti, R. J., Hauenstein, N. M. A., & Bycio, P. (2009). Are the best leaders transformational and transactional? A pattern-oriented analysis. Leadership, 5, 337–359.
   Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D. (2001). Self-concept and identity. In A. Tesser & N. Schwartz ( Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology (pp. 499–517). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, V. (2007). It’s all about me: The role of the self in predicting leadership perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd ( Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schoel, C., Bluemke, M., Mueller, P., & Stahlberg, D. (2011). When autocratic leaders become an option—Uncertainty self-esteem predicts implicit leadership preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 521–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns, B., Kiefer, T., Kerschreiter, R., & Tymon, A. (2011). Teaching implicit leadership theories to develop leaders and leadership: How and why it can make a difference. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns, B., & Meindl, J. R. (2005). Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2010). Implicit leadership theories: Think leader, think effective? Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, K. A., & Brown, D. J. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 230–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. B., Erickson, A., & Harvey, M. (2011). A method for measuring destructive leadership and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 575–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shondrick, S. J., Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 959–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shondrick, S. J., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Implicit leadership and followership theories: Dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, and leader–follower processes. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 159–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality, 76, 875–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Quaquebeke, N., van Knippenberg, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates’ self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar