References
- Abelha, M., S. Fernandes, D. Mesquita, F. Seabra, and A. T. Ferreira-Oliveira. 2020. Graduate employability and competence development in higher education—A systematic literature review using PRISMA. Sustainability 12 (15):5900. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155900.
- Aliguliyev, R. M., and N. A. Adigozalova. 2018. Journal impact factor weighted by SJR and 5-year IF indicators of citing sources. Journal of Scientometric Research 7 (2):94–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.7.2.15.BibTex.
- Almeida, M. I., A. C. Dias, M. Demertzi, and L. Arroja. 2015. Contribution to the development of product category rules for ceramic bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production 92:206–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.073.
- Andreoli, T. P., V. A. Lima, and L. C. Prearo. 2017. (In)Eficácia dos Selos Verdes Sobre o Comportamento dos Consumidores: Um Estudo Experimental. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa 16 (1):62–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2017003.
- Asche, F., and J. Bronnmann. 2017. Price premiums for ecolabelled seafood: MSC certification in Germany. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 61 (4):576–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12217.
- Barnard, E., and A. Mitra. 2010. A contingent valuation method to measure willingness to pay for eco-label products. Proceedings of the Academy for Economics and Economic Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2.
- Bartley, T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113 (2):297–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/518871.
- Betran, O. J., and A. A. Valle. 2017. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes (1985–2015). Thirty years in the context of Spanish physical activity and sports science journals. Apunts Educación Física y Deportes 128 (128):9–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2017/2).128.01.
- Blackman, A., A. Raimondi, and F. Cubbage. 2017. Does forest certification in developing countries have environmental benefits? Insights from Mexican corrective action requests. International Forestry Review 19 (3):247–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817821865072.
- Blasiak, R., J. Hsiang-Wen Huang, H. Ishihara, I. Kelling, S. Lieng, H. Lindoff, A. Macfarlane, A. Minohara, Y. Miyakoshi, H. Wisse, et al. 2017. Promoting diversity and inclusiveness in seafood certification and ecolabelling: Prospects for Asia. Marine Policy 85:42–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.011.
- Bowers, T., I. Ganguly, and I. Eastin. 2014. Eco-labeled wood products in the US residential construction industry: Architects’ awareness and usage of certified wood and green building programs. The Forestry Chronicle 90 (05):605–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2014-124.
- Brasil. Ministério da Educação. 2016. Considerações sobre Qualis Periódicos - Ciências Ambientais. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Diretoria de Avaliação. Brasília, DF, Brazil.
- Brécard, D. 2017. Consumer misperception of eco-labels, green market structure and welfare. Journal of Regulatory Economics 51 (3):340–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9328-8.
- Brendler, E., and L. L. Brandli. 2011. Integração do sistema de gestão ambiental no sistema de gestão de qualidade em uma indústria de confecções. Gestão & Produção 18 (1):27–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2011000100003.
- Bronnmann, J., and F. Asche. 2017. Sustainable seafood from aquaculture and wild fisheries: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Ecological Economics 142:113–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.005.
- Cavero-Rubio, J. A., and A. Amorós-Martínez. 2017. El impacto de la certificación ambiental Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) en el rendimiento financiero de las empresas agrícolas. Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria 113 (3):287–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2017.018.
- Ceruti, F. C., and M. L. N. Silva. 2009. Dificuldades de implantação de sistema de gestão ambiental (SGA) em empresas. Revista Acadêmica: Ciência Animal 7 (1):111–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.7213/cienciaanimal.v7i1.9023.
- Cerutti, A. K., G. L. Beccaro, S. Bruun, D. Donno, L. Bonvegna, and G. Bounous. 2016. Assessment methods for sustainable tourism declarations: The case of holiday farms. Journal of Cleaner Production 111:511–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.032.
- Chang, S.-H.-E., D. Wuepper, A. Heissenhuber, and J. Sauer. 2017. Investigating rice farmers’ preferences for an agri-environmental scheme: Is an eco-label a substitute for payments?Land Use Policy 64:374–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.014.
- Charter, M. 2017. Greener marketing: A responsible approach to business. Oxfordshire: Routledge. 403p.
- Chekima, B., S. Wafa, O. A. Igau, S. Chekima, and S. L. Sondoh, Jr. 2016. Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:4, 3436–3450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.102.
- Clarivate Analytics. 2021. Web of Science platform: Introduction. https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform
- Codagnone, C., G. A. Veltri, F. Bogliacino, F. Lupiáñez-Villanueva, G. Gaskell, A. Ivchenko, P. Ortoleva, and F. Mureddu. 2016. Labels as nudges? An experimental study of car eco-labels. Economia Politica 33 (3):403–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0042-2.
- Corrêa, L. B. C. G. 1998. Comércio e meio ambiente: Atuação diplomática brasileira em relação ao selo verde. Brasília: Instituto Rio Branco, Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, Centro de Estudos Estratégicos.
- Couto, J., T. Tiago, A. Gil, F. Tiago, and S. Faria. 2016. It’s hard to be green: Reverse green value chain. Environmental Research 149:302–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.006.
- Dangelico, R. M., P. Pontrandolfo, and D. Pujari. 2013. Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: Role of external integrative capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (4):642–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12013.
- Dantas, M. A., and R. G. Azzi. 2018. Report on an intervention experiment from the perspective of social cognitive career theory. Trends in Psychology 26 (2):735–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2018.2-08pt.
- Elkington, J. 1998. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environmental Quality Management 8 (1):37–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106.
- FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization. 2002. Guidelines for the integration of sustainable agriculture and rural development. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7541e/w7541e04.htm.
- Ferreira, J., B. Esteves, L. Nunes, and I. Domingos. 2016. Life Cycle Assessment as a tool to promote sustainable Thermowood boards: A Portuguese case study. International Wood Products Journal 7 (3):124–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2016.1160592.
- Gelowitz, M. D. C., and J. J. McArthur. 2017. Comparison of type III environmental product declarations for construction products: Material sourcing and harmonization evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 157:125–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.133.
- Giessen, L., S. Burns, M. A K. Sahide, and A. Wibowo. 2016. From governance to government: The strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification. Policy and Society 35 (1):71–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.02.001.
- Giuliani, E., L. Ciravegna, A. Vezzulli, and B. Kilian. 2017. Decoupling standards from practice: The impact of in-house certifications on coffee farms’ environmental and social conduct. World Development 96:294–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.013.
- Gokirmakl, C., M. Bayram, and E. Tigan. 2017. Behaviors of consumers on EU Eco-label: A case study for Romanian consumers. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 23 (3):512–7.
- Gonçalves, J. C. A., R. D. L. Dutra, R. L. Lopes, and R. L. Rodrigues. 2014. O impacto do Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida na economia brasileira: Uma análise de insumo-produto. Ambiente Construído 14 (1):177–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-86212014000100014.
- Goswami, P. 2008. Is the urban Indian consumer ready for clothing with eco‐labels?International Journal of Consumer Studies 32 (5):438–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00716.x.
- Gulbrandsen, L. H. 2006. Creating markets for eco‐labelling: Are consumers insignificant?International Journal of Consumer Studies 30 (5):477–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00534.x.
- Gupta, S., D. Hanssens, B. Hardie, W. Kahn, V. Kumar, N. Lin, N. Ravishanker, and S. Sriram. 2006. Modeling customer lifetime value. Journal of Service Research 9 (2):139–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506293810.
- Häfliger, I. F., V. John, A. Passer, S. Lasvaux, E. Hoxha, M. Saade, and G. Habert. 2017. Buildings environmental impacts’ sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials. Journal of Cleaner Production 156:805–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052.
- Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., G. Arana, and O. Boiral. 2016. Outcomes of environmental management systems: The role of motivations and firms’ characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment 25 (8):545–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1884.
- Hoek, J., N. Roling, and D. Holdsworth. 2013. Ethical claims and labelling: An analysis of consumers’ beliefs and choice behaviors. Journal of Marketing Management 29 (7–8):772–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.715430.
- Ihemezie, E. J., I. C. Ukwuaba, and A. P. Nnaji. 2018. Impact of ‘green’ product label standards on consumer behaviour: A systematic review analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8 (9):666–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4647.
- Iraldo, F., and M. Barberio. 2017. Drivers, barriers and benefits of the EU ecolabel in European companies’ perception. Sustainability 9 (5):751. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050751.
- ISO. 2006. International Organization for Standardization ISO 14025:2006. Environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations—Principles and procedures. Switzerland.
- ISO. 2016. International Organization for Standardization ISO 14021:2016. Environmental labels and declarations—Self-declared environmental claims - Type II environmental labelling. Switzerland
- ISO. 2018. International Organization for Standardization ISO 14024:2018. Environmental labels and declarations—Type I environmental labelling—Principles and procedures. Switzerland.
- ISO. 2019. International Organization for Standardization Environmental Labels. https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100323.pdf
- Karlsson, L., and S. Dolnicar. 2016. Does eco certification sell tourism services? Evidence from a quasi-experimental observation study in Iceland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 24 (5):694–714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1088859.
- Kikuchi-Uehara, E., J. Nakatani, and M. Hirao. 2016. Analysis of factors influencing consumers’ proenvironmental behavior based on life cycle thinking. Part I: Effect of environmental awareness and trust in environmental information on product choice. Journal of Cleaner Production 117:10–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.030.
- Kwok, S. Y., D. Harrison, and A. Malizia. 2017. Designing individualisation of eco information: A conceptual framework and design toolkit. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 10 (6):302–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2017.1348562.
- Laso, J., M. Margallo, P. Fullana, A. Bala, C. Gazulla, Á. Irabien, and R. Aldaco. 2017. Aiding eco-labelling process and its implementation: Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology to define Product Category Rules for canned anchovies. MethodsX 4:143–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2017.03.001.
- Loureiro, M. L., and J. Lotade. 2005. Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience?Ecological Economics 53 (1):129–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.002.
- Ma, Y. J., H. J. Gam, and J. Banning. 2017. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: Application of the technology acceptance model. Fashion and Textiles 4 (1):3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0093-1.
- Minkov, N., L. Schneider, A. Lehmann, and M. Finkbeiner. 2015. Type III Environmental Declaration Programmes and harmonization of product category rules: Status quo and practical challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 94:235–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.012.
- Modahl, I. S., C. Askham, K. A. Lyng, C. Skjerve-Nielssen, and G. Nereng. 2013. Comparison of two versions of an EPD, using generic and specific data for the foreground system, and some methodological implications. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18 (1):241–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0449-0.
- Moher, D., L. Shamseer, M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, A. Liberati, M. Petticrew, P. Shekelle, L. A. Stewart, and PRISMA-P Group. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews 4 (1):1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
- Motoshita, M., M. Sakagami, Y. Kudoh, K. Tahara, and A. Inaba. 2015. Potential impacts of information disclosure designed to motivate Japanese consumers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions on the choice of shopping method for daily foods and drinks. Journal of Cleaner Production 101:205–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.005.
- Mukherjee, A., and H. Dylla. 2017. Challenges to using environmental product declarations in communicating life-cycle assessment results: Case of the asphalt industry. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2639 (1):84–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2639-11.
- Nadlifatin, R., S. Lin, Y. Rachmaniati, S. Persada, and M. Razif. 2016. A pro-environmental reasoned action model for measuring citizens’ intentions regarding ecolabel product usage. Sustainability 8 (11):1165. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111165.
- Oláh, J., E. Krisán, A. Kiss, Z. Lakner, and J. Popp. 2020. PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews of the bioethanol sector. Energies 13 (9):2323. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092323.
- Orsato, R. J. 2006. Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green?California Management Review 48 (2):127–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166341.
- Pawlowski, A. 2008. How many dimensions does sustainable development have?Sustainable Development 16 (2):81–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.339.
- Peiró-Signes, A., M. D. V. Segarra-Oña, R. Verma, J. Mondéjar-Jiménez, and M. Vargas-Vargas. 2014. The impact of environmental certification on hotel guest ratings. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 55 (1):40–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965513503488.
- Pott, C. M., and C. C. Estrela. 2017. Histórico ambiental: Desastres ambientais e o despertar de um novo pensamento. Estudos Avançados 31 (89):271–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.31890021.
- Prieto-Sandoval, V., J. A. Alfaro, A. Mejía-Villa, and M. Ormazabal. 2016. ECO-labels as a multidimensional research topic: Trends and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production 135:806–818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.167.
- Rex, E., and H. Baumann. 2007. Beyond ecolabels: What green marketing can learn from conventional marketing?Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (6):567–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.013.
- Ribas, J. R., T. V. S. Vicente, J. G. Altaf, and I. R. Troccoli. 2017. Integração de ações na gestão sustentável. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre) 23 (2):31–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413.2311.112.58086.
- Rino, C. A. F., and N. Salvador. 2017. ISO 14001 certification process and reduction of environmental penalties in organizations in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (Part 4):3627–3633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.105.
- Rodrigues, R., S. Gandolfi, A. Nave, J. Aronson, T. Barreto, C. Vidal, and P. Brancalion. 2011. Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 261 (10):1605–1613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.005.
- Sampaio, L. P., and R. B. Exler. 2017. ISO 14000: Perspectivas para a Sociedade Empresarial e o Meio Ambiente. Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da FAT 3 (2):74–83.
- Scarpellini, S., R. Ortega-Lapiedra, M. Marco-Fondevila, and A. Aranda-Usón. 2017. Human capital in the eco-innovative firms: A case study of eco-innovation projects. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 23 (6):919–933. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2017-0219.
- Schwabl, M., M. Schwarz, F. Figl, L. Carvalho, M. Staudinger, W. Kalb, C. Schmidl, and W. Haslinger. 2013. Development of a biomass heating device for low energy and passive houses. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 24 (5):652–666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2010-0046.
- SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online. 2021. About SciELO. https://scielo.org/en.
- Scopus. 2020. Scopus content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com/?a=69451.
- Sillani, S., and F. Nassivera. 2015. Consumer behavior in choice of minimally processed vegetables and implications for marketing strategies. Trends in Food Science & Technology 46 (2):339–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.004.
- Silva, A. T., A. P. Kern, R. Piccoli, and M. A. S. González. 2014. Novas exigências decorrentes de programas de certificação ambiental de prédios e de normas de desempenho na construção. Arquitetura Revista 10 (2):105–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.4013/arq.2014.102.06.
- Sonnenberg, N., B. Jacobs, and D. Momberg. 2014. The role of information exposure in female university students’ evaluation and selection of eco-friendly apparel in the South African emerging economy. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 32 (4):266–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X14541542.
- Stecker, M. 2016. Awash in a sea of confusion: Benefit corporations, social enterprise, and the fear of "Greenwashing”. Journal of Economic Issues 50 (2):373–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1176481.
- Suttie, E., C. Hill, G. Sandin, A. Kutnar, C. Ganne-Chédeville, F. Lowres, and A. C. Dias. 2017. Environmental assessment of bio-based building materials - Chapter 9. In Performance of Bio-based Building Materials, ed. Dennis Jones and Christian Brischke. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.
- Tang, E., G. E. Fryxell, and C. S. F. Chow. 2004. Visual and verbal communication in the design of eco-label for green consumer products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 16 (4):85–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v16n04_05.
- Teisl, M. F., B. Roe, and R. L. Hicks. 2002. Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (3):339–359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1186.
- Thøgersen, J., P. Haugaard, and A. Olesen. 2010. Consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing 44 (11/12):1787–1810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011079882.
- Tinker, C. 2016. Ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns through the United Nations’ global goals: The international law and policy perspective. Revista de Direito Do Consumidor 25 (107):385–406.
- UN. 2008. United Nations International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Revision 4. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/4/Rev.4 United Nations Publication Sales No. E.08.XVII.25 ISBN: 978-92-1-161518-0, New York.
- UN. 2015. United Nations Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-17981.
- van Amstel, M., P. Driessen, and P. Glasbergen. 2008. Eco-labeling and information asymmetry: A comparison of five eco-labels in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (3):263–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.039.
- van der Vooren, A., F. Alkemade, and M. P. Hekkert. 2013. Environmental performance and firm strategies in the Dutch automotive sector. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 54:111–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.07.005.
- Vázquez, R. I., R. P. Villanueva, M. T. Moreira, and G. Feijoo. 2016. Opportunities and challenges of implementing life cycle assessment in seafood certification: A case study for Spain. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21 (4):451–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1043-7.
- Veisten, K. 2007. Willingness to pay for eco-labelled wood furniture: Choice-based conjoint analysis versus open-ended contingent valuation. Journal of Forest Economics 13 (1):29–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2006.10.002.
- Viana, E. C., R. M. M. A. Carvalho, P. R. S. Oliveira, S. R. Valverde, and T. S. Soares. 2003. Análise técnico-jurídica do licenciamento ambiental e sua interface com a certificação ambiental. Revista Árvore 27 (4):587–595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622003000400019.
- Vlosky, R., L. Ozanne, and R. Fontenot. 1999. A conceptual model of US consumer willingness to pay for environmental certified wood products. Journal of Consumer Marketing 16 (2):122–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769910260498.
- Zhambaev, S., K. Sagieva, Z. Bazarbek, and R. Akkulov. 2016. Current problems of improving the environmental certification and output compliance verification in the context of environmental management in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (15):8006–8016. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1118318.pdf.
- Zhou, G., W. Hu, and W. Huang. 2016. Are consumers willing to pay more for sustainable products? A study of eco-labeled tuna steak. Sustainability 8 (5):494. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050494.