Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 15, 2008 - Issue 2
303
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Responsible Conduct of Research Measure: Initial Development and Pilot Study

, &
Pages 87-104 | Published online: 14 Apr 2008

References

  • Alberts , B. and Shine , K. 1994 . Scientists and the integrity of research . Science , 266 : 1660 – 1661 .
  • Aleamoni , L. M. 1976 . The relation of sample size to the number of variables in using factor analysis techniques . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 36 : 879 – 883 .
  • Allen , M. J. and Yen , W. M. 1979 . Introduction to Measurement Theory , Lon Grove, Illinois : Waveland Press Inc .
  • American Counseling Association (2005). ACA code of Ethics 2005. http://www.counseling.org/Resources/CodeOfEthics/TP/Home/CT2.aspx (Accessed: 18 March 2008 ).
  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html (Accessed: 17 January 2007 ).
  • Anderson , M. S. 1996 . Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute's graduate education project . Journal of Information Ethics , 5 : 15 – 33 .
  • Anderson , M. S. , Seashore Louis , K. and Earle , J. 1994 . Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct . The Journal of Higher Education , 65 : 331 – 350 .
  • Broome , M. E. , Pryor , E. , Habermann , B. , Pulley , L. and Kincaid , H. 2006 . The scientific misconduct questionnaire-revised (SMQ-R): Validation and psychometric testing . Accountability in Research , 12 : 263 – 280 .
  • Converse , J. M. and Presser , S. 1986 . Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–063 , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications .
  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Professional standards. http://www.ideapractices.org/ps/ (Accessed: 17 January 2007 ).
  • Crowne , D. P. and Marlowe , D. 1964 . The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence , New York : Wiley .
  • Davis , M. S. , Riske , M. L. and Seaman , M. 2001 . Research Misconduct: An Inquiry into Etiology and Stigma , Amherst, OH : Justice Research and Advocacy Inc . Final Report Presented to the Office of Research Integrity
  • Davis, M. S., Wester, K. L., and King, B. (2008). Narcissism, entitlement, and questionable practices of research in counseling. A pilot study, Journal of Counseling and Development.
  • de Vries , R. , Anderson , M. S. and Martinson , B. C. 2006 . Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research . Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics , 1 : 43 – 50 .
  • Del Boca , F. K. and Noll , J. A. 2000 . Truth or consequences: The validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions . Addiction , 95 : S347 – S360 .
  • Gardner , W. . The social cost of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices . Presentation given at the ORI Research Conference . December , Tampa, FL
  • Golub , A. , Johnson , B. D. , Taylor , A. and Liberty , H. J. 2002 . The validity of arrestees' self-reports: Variations across questions and persons . Justice Quarterly , 19 : 477 – 502 .
  • Guadagnoli , E. and Velicer , W. F. 1988 . Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns . Psychological Bulletin , 103 : 265 – 275 .
  • Institute of Medicine National Research Council . 2002 . Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct , Washington, D.C. : The National Academics Press .
  • McDonald , R. P. 1999 . Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
  • Martinson , B. C. , Anderson , M. S. , Crain , A. L. and de Vries , R. 2006 . Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors . Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics , 1 : 51 – 66 .
  • MacCallum , R. C. , Widaman , K. F. , Zhang , S. and Hong , S. 1999 . Sample size in factor Analysis . Psychological Methods , 4 : 84 – 99 .
  • Office of Research Integrity. (2000). PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) – suspended. http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/programs/finalpolicy.asp (Accessed: 12 March 2004 ).
  • Office of Research Integrity. (2003). Research on research integrity http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-NS-03-001.html (Accessed: 20 February 2004 ).
  • Office of Research Integrity. (2006). Handling misconduct – case summaries http://ori.dhhs.gov/misconduct/cases/ (Accessed: 20 February 2004 ).
  • Rankin , M. and Esteeves , M. 1997 . Perceptions of scientific misconduct in nursing . Nursing Research , 46 : 270 – 276 .
  • Ray , J. 1984 . The reliability of short social desirability scales . Journal of Social Psychology , 123 : 133 – 134 .
  • Recchia Jeffers , B. 2005 . Research environments that promote integrity . Nursing Research , 54 : 63 – 70 .
  • Sapnas , K. G. and Zeller , R. A. 2002 . Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement . Journal of Nursing Measurement , 10 : 135 – 154 .
  • Shafir, S., and Kennedy, D. (1998). Research misconduct: Media exaggerate results of a survey, The Scientist, 12: 0 http://www.the-scientist.com/yr1998/june/opin_980622.html (Accessed: 15 July 2007 ).
  • Steneck , N. H. 2003 . The role of professional societies in promoting integrity in Research . American Journal of Health and Behavior , 27 : S239 – S247 .
  • Steneck , N. H. 2006 . Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions . Science and Engineering Ethics , 12 : 53 – 74 .
  • Thompson , B. 2004 . Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis , Washington, DC : American Psychological Association .
  • Wiles , R. , Charles , V. , Crow , G. and Heath , S. 2006 . Researching researchers: Lessons for research ethics . Qualitative Research , 6 : 283 – 299 .
  • Wilson , T. D. and Nisbett , R. E. 1978 . The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations and behavior . Social Psychology , 41 : 118 – 131 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.