References
- Ancker , J. S. and Flanagin , A. 2007 . A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines . Science and Engineering Ethics , 13 : 147 – 157 .
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2004). A code of conduct for editors of biomedical journals. http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines/code (Accessed: 27 May 2009 ).
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2009). Home. http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/ (Accessed: 27 May 2009 ).
- Council of Science Editors. White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/white_paper.cfm (Accessed: 27 May 2009 ).
- Couzin , J. and Unger , K. 2006 . Scientific misconduct: Cleaning up the paper trail . Science , 312 : 38 – 43 .
- Cyranoski , D. 2006 . Verdict: Hwang's human stems cell were all fakes . Nature , 439 : 122 – 123 .
- ISI Web of Knowledge. (2008). Journal Citation Reports. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?SID=4Ec3d5Fi3HhF7JIFbfi (Accessed: 6 October 2008 ).
- Kinitisch , E. 2005 . Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers . Science , 307 : 1851
- Momen , H. and Gollogly , L. 2007 . Cross-cultural perspectives of scientific misconduct . Medical Law , 26 : 409 – 416 .
- Office of Science and Technology Policy . 2005 . Federal Research Misconduct Policy . Federal Register , 65 ( 235 ) : 76260 – 76264 .
- Random.org. (2008). http://random.org/ (Accessed: 6 October 2008 ).
- Redman , B. and Merz , J. 2006 . Research misconduct policies of highest impact biomedical journals . Accountability in Research , 13 : 247 – 258 .
- Resnik , D. 2003 . From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct . Accountability in Research , 10 : 123 – 135 .
- Resnik , D. 2008 . “ Fraud, fabrication, and falsification ” . In Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics , Edited by: Emanuel , E. 787 – 794 . New York : Oxford University Press .