Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 23, 2016 - Issue 1
249
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Too Many Rationales, Not Enough Reason: A Call to Examine the Goals of Including Lay Members on Institutional Review Boards

, Ph.D.

References

  • Allison, R. D., Abbott, L. J., and Wichman, A. (2008). Roles and experiences of non-scientist Institutional Review Board members at the National Institutes of Health. IRB, 30:8.
  • Anderson, E. E. (2006). A qualitative study of non-affiliated, non-scientist Institutional Review Board members. Accountability in Research, 13:135–55.
  • Bauer, P. E. (2000). A few simple truths about your community IRB members. IRB, 23:7–8.
  • Bell, J., Whiton, J., and Connelly, S. (1998). Final Report: Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects. Arlington, VA: James Bell Associates.
  • Brown, M. B. (2006). Survey article: Citizen panels and the concept of representation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14:203–225.
  • Cho, M. K. and Billings, P. (1997). Conflict of interest and Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Investigative Medicine: The Official Publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 45:154–159.
  • De Vries, R. and Forsberg, C. P. (2002). Who decides? A look at ethics committee membership. HEC Forum, 14:252–258.
  • Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1973). Protection of Human Subjects: Policies and Procedures. 38, no. 221, pt. 2. Washington, D.C.
  • Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). 45 CFR 46.
  • Dyer, S. (2004). Rationalizing public participation in the health service: The case of research ethics committees. Health and Place, 10:339–348.
  • Emanuel, E. J., Grady, C. C., Crouch, R. A., Lie, R. K., Miller, F. G., and Wendler, D. D. (2011). The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hausman, D. M. (2007). Group risks, risks to groups, and group engagement in genetics research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17:351.
  • Hayes, G. J., Hayes, S. C., and Dykstra, T. (1995). A survey of university Institutional Review Boards: Characteristics, policies, and procedures. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17:1–6.
  • Klitzman, R. (2012). Institutional Review Board community members: Who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent? Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87:975.
  • Levine, R. J. (1988). Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants. Available at https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/25.
  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). Report and Recommendations: Institutional Review Boards. The Commission.
  • National Institutes of Health. (1953). Group Consideration of Clinical Research Procedures Deviated Form Accepted Medical Practice or Involving Unusual Hazard. Available at history.nih.gov/research/downloads/NIH1953humansubjectpolicy.pdf.
  • Office for Human Research Protections. (1993). IRB Guidebook. Washington, D.C. Office for the Protection from Research Risks: Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/irb/irb_guidebook.htm.
  • Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Services (1998). Institutional Review Boards: A Time for Reform. BiblioBazaar.
  • Porter, J. P. (1987). How unaffiliated/nonscientist members of Institutional Review Boards see their roles. IRB, 9:1–6.
  • Ross, L. F., Loup, A., Nelson, R. M., Botkin, J. R., Kost, R., Smith, Jr., G. R., and Gehlert, S. (2010). Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: A research ethics framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 5:5.
  • Rothstein, W. G. and Phuong. L. H. (2007). Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39:75–81.
  • Sengupta, S. and Lo, B. (2003). The roles and experiences of nonaffiliated and non-scientist members of Institutional Review Boards. Academic Medicine, 78:212–218.
  • Slaven, M. J. (2007). First impressions: The experiences of a community member on a research ethics committee. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 29:17–19.
  • U.S. Surgeon General. (1966). Surgeon General’s Directives on Human Experimentation. U.S. Public Health Service. Available at history.nih.gov/research/downloads/Surgeongeneraldirective1966.pdf.
  • Veatch, R. M. (1975). Human experimentation committees: Professional or representative? Hastings Center Report, 5:31–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.