References
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM); Committee on Responsible Science. 2017. Fostering integrity in research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM); Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. 1992. Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process, vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM); Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. 2002. Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2009. On being a scientist, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One 4 (5):e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
- Kalichman, M. W. 2007. Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 82 (9):870–75. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
- Kornfeld, D. S. 2012. Perspective: Research misconduct: The search for a remedy. Academic Medicine 87 (7):877–82. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318257ee6a.
- Macrina, F., ed. 2014. Scientific integrity, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press.
- Pimple, K. D. 2002. Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191–205. doi:10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1.
- Price, A. 2013. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: The origin and history of the office of research integrity—With personal views by ORI’s former associate director for investigative oversight. Accountability in Research 20 (5–6):291–319. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822238.
- Shamoo, A. E. 1989a. A note from the editor. Accountability in Research 1 (1):1–2. doi:10.1080/08989628908573768.
- Shamoo, A. E. 1989b. Principles of research data audit. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.
- Shamoo, A. E. 2013. Data audit as a way to prevent/contain misconduct. Accountability in Research 20 (5–6):369–79. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822259.
- Shamoo, A. E., and Z. Annau. 1987. Ensuring scientific integrity. Nature 327 (6123):550. doi:10.1038/327550b0.
- Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible conduct of research, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Steele, L. M., T. J. Mulhearn, K. E. Medeiros, L. L. Watts, S. Connelly, and M. D. Mumford. 2016. How do we know what works? A review and critique of current practices in ethics training evaluation. Accountability in Research 23 (6):319–50. doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1186547.
- Steneck, N. 2000. Assessing the integrity of publicly funded research. Proceedings from the ORI conference on research integrity, 1–16. Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity.
- Titus, S. L., J. A. Wells, and L. J. Rhoades. 2008. Repairing research integrity. Nature 453 (7198):980–82. doi:10.1038/453980a.
- Todd, E. M., B. S. Torrence, L. L. Watts, T. J. Mulhearn, S. Connelly, and M. D. Mumford. 2017. Effective practices in the delivery of research ethics education: A qualitative review of instructional methods. Accountability in Research 24 (5):297–321. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1301210.
- United Kingdom Research Integrity Office (UKRIO). 2017. About us. http://ukrio.org/about-us/ ( accessed May 11, 2017).