References
- “Persuading the Prescribers: Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing and its Influence on Physicians and Patients”. 2013. The pew charitable trusts - prescription project. http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/factsheets/ 2013/11/11/persuading-the-prescribers-pharmaceutical-industry-marketing-and-its-influence- on-physicians-and-patients (accessed November 22, 2017).
- 13th Annual Report. 2016. 2016 national joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. The NJR Editorial Board at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2013th%20Annual%20Report%202016.pdf.
- AdvaMed. 2009. CODE OF ETHICS ON INTERACTIONS WITH HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. https://www.advamed.org/sites/default/files/resource/112_112_code_of_ethics_0.pdf (accessed May 20, 2016).
- Ardaugh, B. M., S. E. Graves, and R. F. Redberg. 2013. The 510(k) ancestry of a metal-on-metal hip implant. N Engl J Med 368 (2):97–100. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1211581.
- Avorn, J., M. Chen, and R. Hartley. 1982. Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am J Med 73 (1):4–8.
- Barbour, V. M., D. Burch, F. Godlee, C. Heneghan, R. Lehman, R. Perera, J. S. Ross, and S. Schroter. 2016. Characterisation of trials where marketing purposes have been influential in study design: A descriptive study. Trials 17 (31):1-10.
- Barrett, W. 2015a. Deposition Testimony. Pinnacle Hip Implant Litigation MDL No. 2244: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 570–74, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc, September 10. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Barrett%20Deposition%202015.09.10%20pg%20570-574.pdf.
- Barrett, W. 2015b. Deposition Testimony. Pinnacle Hip Implant Litigation MDL No. 2244: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 431–2, 610–1, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc, September 10. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Barrett%20Deposition%202015.09.10%20pg%20431-432%2C%20610-611.pdf.
- Barrett, W. P., K. A. Kindsfater, and J. P. Lesko. 2012. Large-diameter modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty incidence of revision for adverse reaction to metallic debris. The Journal of Arthroplasty 27 (6):976–83.
- Bernasek, T. L., J. A. Polikandriotis, M. F. Levering, D. F. Dalury, D. A. Fisher, and M. J. Adler. 2013. Five- to ten-year outcomes for modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 28 (7):1231–34. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.012.
- Burge, A. J., S. L. Gold, B. Lurie, D. H. Nawabi, K. G. Fields, M. F. Koff, G. Westrich, and H. G. Potter. 2015. MR imaging of adverse local tissue reactions around rejuvenate modular dual-taper stems. Radiology 277 (1):142–50. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015141967.
- Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie 19 (6):418–27.
- Deposition Exhibit Egilman-02. 2015. Supplemental Expert Witness Report of David Egilman. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. September 23. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/?dir=PIN%20Seeding%20Study.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-02. 2004. Multi-center prospective clinical evaluation of pinnacle acetabular implants in total hip arthroplasty. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, September. DEPUY046334983-90. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-02.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-20. 2013. Note-to-File IRB Approvals & CV - Missing Forms and Action Item Resolution (Site 98). Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. January 3. DEPUY079849982. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-20.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-21. 2013. Note-to-File IRB Approvals & CV - Missing Forms and Action Item Resolution (Site 10). Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 3. DEPUY079849510. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-21.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-22. 2013. Note-to-File IRB Approvals & CV - Missing Forms and Action Item Resolution (Site 01). Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 3. DEPUY079849003. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-22.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-23. 2013. Note-to-File IRB Approvals & CV - Missing Forms and Action Item Resolution (Site 07). Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 3. DEPUY079849490. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-23.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-24. 2006. AAOS View Poster/Podium Submission. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, June 1. DEPUY048379109-11. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-24.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Forster-27. 2003. [REDACTED], MD CRF Processing Instructions. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 29. DEPUY095787571. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster-27.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Jewell-06. 2006. Pinnacle Study Survival for AAOS 2007 - Oct Update. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, October. DEPUY077372763-944. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Jewell-06.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Jewell-07. 2006. Average Follow-Up for AAOS Submission. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Jewell-07.pdf.
- Deposition Exhibit Kindsfater-25. 2001. Research Contract and PIN Study Protocol 2.0. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, September 19. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Kindsfater-25.pdf.
- DePuy-Synthes. 2015. “SUMMIT Tapered Hip System POROCOAT & DUOFIX HA.” Accessed May 20 2015. www.depuysynthes.com/hcp/hip/products/qs/SUMMIT-Tapered-Hip-system.
- Dhotare, S. V., D. G. Shivarathre, C. Croitoru, C. Armstrong, B. Kapoor, and V. K. Peter. 2016. Medium-term results following large diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: Increasing failure after 6 years. Hip International 26 (3):226–32. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000344.
- Dorey, F., and H. C. Amstutz. 1986. Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. J Arthroplasty 1 (1):63–69.
- Dowd, J., K. Kindsfater, W. Barrett, C. Southworth, and D. Dalury. 2008. Large femoral heads can help reduce risk of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 23 (2):318. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.231.
- Exhibit DEMO-03385. 2015. Response to Mayo Clinic Subpoena. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, August 28. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/DEMO-03385.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00014. 2014. Cross-sectional, multi-center, evaluation of 8-year metal ion trends for pinnacle mom system used in primary total hip arthroplasty 10017 - Pinnacle MoM. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, November 21. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00014.pptx.
- Exhibit PLT-00015. 2000. Re: PINNACLE clinical research strategy. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, June 5. DEPUY048359419-20. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00015.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00026. 2010. Pinnacle Hip Solutions POWERPLAY AID INC Selling Guide. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. DEPUY019393887-932. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00026.PDF.
- Exhibit PLT-00041. 2008. Don’t Let hip arthritis pain stop you from moving Patient Brochure. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. DEPUY001380440-8. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00041.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00046. 2013. HipReplacement.com Screenshot 2013. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, October 7. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00046.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00049. 2008. Final first quarterly report of the monitor for DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. to Christopher J Christie, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, March 18. MONITOR_REPORTS-000000001-148. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00049.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00057. 2008. Pinnacle Hip Solutions Design Rationale. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. DEPUY008588507-40. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00057.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00116. 2011. Never Stop Moving Patient Brochure. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. DCMED-000158125-36. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00116.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00633. 2001. Re: Pinnacle Study Folders. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, June 15. DEPUY048357086-7. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00633.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00646. 2005. Re: IRC #05-52, DePuy, “Multi-Center, Prospective, Clinical Evaluation of Pinnacle Acetabular Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, September 20. DEPUY048360927-31. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00646.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00648. 2005. Re: IRC #05-52, DePuy, “Multi-Center, Prospective, Clinical Evaluation of Pinnacle Acetabular Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, September 14. DEPUY048360938-9. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00648.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00801. 2009. aSphere contoured metal heads design rationale. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. DEPUY026149668-91. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00801.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-00858. 2007. RE: AAOS pinnacle poster. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, January 30. DEPUY019005025-6. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-00858.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-02933. 2008. On-going project summary. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, April 11. DEPUY050041674-6. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-02933.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-02957. 2005. Potential pinnacle cup study investigator list. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, April 12. DEPUY050096581-93. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-02957.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-02960. 2013. Re: Pinnacle outcomes study update. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, February 26. DEPUY074526265-7. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-02960.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03242. 2009. 2010 national sales meeting plan. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, December 28. DEPUY008220678-9. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03242.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03244. 1999. Business team project update, project title PINNACLE. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, October 15. DEPUY05607112. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03244.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03245. 1999. NEW PROJECT DATA FORM-PART 2, Project Title: PINNACLE Acetabular implant system. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, October 13. DEPUY05607113-4. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03245.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03416. 0000. Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. DPA-000002265-88. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03416.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03482. 2006. Pinnacle IRB Listing. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, December 9. DEPUY046334440. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03482.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03517. 0000. PIN Study CRF Collection. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc.
- Exhibit PLT-03535. 0000. Investigator’s Responsibilities and 10 Commandments of GCP for the Investigator. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03535.pdf.
- Exhibit PLT-03821. 2007. Corporate integrity agreement between the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services and Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, September 27. DEPUY-R-017595747-86. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/PLT-03821.pdf.
- FDA. 2015. Overview of device regulation. US Food and Drug Administration. Last Modified August 14 2015 Accessed, accessed January 30 2016. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/Overview/.
- Feder, B. J. 2008. “U.S. government examining doctor kickbacks for medical devices.” The New York Times, March 24.
- Forster, D. 2015a. Deposition Testimony. Pinnacle Hip Implant Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 2244: United States District Court Northern District Of Texas Dallas Division, 207–11, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc, December 14. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster%20Deposition%202015.12.14%20pg%20207-211.pdf.
- Forster, D. 2015b. Deposition testimony. Pinnacle Hip Implant Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 2244: United States District Court Northern District Of Texas Dallas Division, 92–95, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc, December 14. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster%20Deposition%202015.12.14%20pg%2092-95.pdf.
- Forster, D. 2015c. Deposition testimony. Pinnacle Hip Implant Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 2244: United States District Court Northern District Of Texas Dallas Division, 182–86, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc, December 14. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Forster%20Deposition%202015.12.14%20pg%20182-186.pdf.
- Fugh-Berman, A., and S. Ahari. 2007. Following the script: How drug reps make friends and influence doctors. PLoS Medicine 4 (4):e150.
- Greiner, J. J., J. J. Callaghan, N. A. Bedard, S. S. Liu, D. D. Goetz, and C. R. Mahoney. 2016. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at five to twelve years follow-up: A concise follow-up of a previous report. Journal of Arthroplasty 31 (8):1773–78. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.058.
- Hill, K. P., J. S. Ross, D. S. Egilman, and H. M. Krumholz. 2008. The ADVANTAGE seeding trial: A review of internal documents. Ann Intern Med 149:251–58. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-4-200808190-00006.
- Hosny, H. A. H., S. C. M. Srinivasan, J. Keenan, and H. Fekry. 2013. Midterm results with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing/Synergy stem modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 79 (4):386–91.
- Howe, K. 2016. Deposition Testimony. Pinnacle Hip Implant Litigation MDL No. 2244: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 46–50, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc, September 9. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/Howe%20Deposition%202016.09.09%20pg%2046-50.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2007. Pinnacle acetabular cup system design rationale. Accessed January 30 2017. http://www.pei.ie/PEI/media/PEI-media/PDFs/PDFs_Ortho/PDFs_Ortho_Products/PDFs_Ortho_Products_DePuy/Pinnacle-Design-Rationale.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2008a. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (10).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008b. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (11).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008c. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (12).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008d. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (5).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008e. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 90-A (4).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008f. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (5):90–A.
- J&J/DePuy. 2008g. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 90-A (6).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008h. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 90-A (10).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008i. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 90-A (11).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008j. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 90-A (12).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008k. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (4).
- J&J/DePuy. 2008l. Pinnacle hip solutions print ad. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (6).
- J&J/DePuy. 2011a. ALTRX altra-linked polyethylene product overview. Accessed January 30 2017. http://synthes.vo.llnwd.net/o16/LLNWMB8/INT%20Mobile/Synthes%20International/Product%20Support%20Material/legacy_DePuy_PDFs/DPEM-ORT-0612-0112_0612-28-060_LR.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2011b. Move ahead with confidence - Choose your hip replacement from DePuy Orthopaedics. Accessed May 20 2016. www.gsortho.org/files/dpy_choose_hip_replacement_brochre_0612-99-510.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2011c. Never Stop Moving Hip replacement solutions from DePuy Orthopaedics. Accessed February 12 2016. http://www.reallifetested.com/binary/org/DEPUY/doc/pt.com/0612-01-511%20Hip%20Flipchart.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2012. ALTRX Altra-Linked Polyethylene Design Rationale. Accessed January 30 2017. https://www.jnj.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/AltrX-ENG.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2013. Pinnacle hip solutions design rationale. Accessed January 30 2017. https://258413772373414384.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/2013/11/DPY_Pinnacle_Hip_Solutions_EO-12920pdf.pdf.
- J&J/DePuy. 2014. Multi-center, prospective, clinical evaluation of pinnacle acetabular implants in total hip arthroplasty. Last Modified July 28 2014 Accessed May 20 2016. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00306930.
- J&J/DePuy. 2016. Never stop moving hip replacement solutions from DePuy Orthopaedics. Accessed February 12 2016. http://www.reallifetested.com/binary/org/DEPUY/doc/pt.com/0612-01-511%20Hip%20Flipchart.pdf
- J&J/DePuy-Synthes. 2014. Pinnacle hip solutions product rationale. [Product Information]. Last Modified April 1 2016. http://corailpinnacle.net/sites/default/files/DPEM-ORT-1212-0397%281%29.pdf (accessed May 20, 2017).
- Kesselheim, A. S., and J. Avorn. 2007. The role of litigation in defining drug risks. Jama 297 (3):308–11.
- Kessler, D. A., J. L. Rose, R. J. Temple, R. Schapiro, and J. P. Griffin. 1994. Therapeutic-class wars—Drug promotion in a competitive marketplace. The New England Journal of Medicine 331:1350–53.
- Kindsfater, K. 2014. “Ten year THA survivorship with a modular cup - results of a large multi-center study.” http://icjr.net/media/video.5927.htm?validated (accessed May 20, 2016).
- Kindsfater, K., and J. Lesko. 2017. Survivorship of a modular acetabular cup system: Medium- to long-term follow-up. Arthroplasty Today. Article in press:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.artd.2017.07.001.
- Kindsfater, K. A., W. Barrett, J. Dowd, C. Southworth, and M. J. Cassell. 2007. Poster No P077. Midterm survival of the pinnacle multi-liner acetabular cup with abstract from AAOS proceedings. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, AAOS Annual Meeting 2007.
- Kindsfater, K. A., C. J. Sychterz Terefenko, T. A. Gruen, and C. M. Sherman. 2012. Minimum 5-year results of modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27 (4):545–50. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.002.
- Kinkeade, E. 2016. Order denying in part and granting in part defendants’ motion to seal certain documents. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, October 3. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/
- Kinkeade, E. 2012. Stipulated Protective Order of Confidentiality. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc, May 7. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2012.05.07%20Stipulated%20Protective%20Order.pdf.
- Klingenstein, G. G., A. M. Yeager, J. D. Lipman, and G. H. Westrich. 2012. Increased range of motion to impingement with large head total hip arthroplasty: Point of diminishing returns. Hip International 22 (3):261–65. doi:10.5301/hip.2012.9285.
- Klingenstein, G. G., A. M. Yeager, J. D. Lipman, and G. H. Westrich. 2013. Computerized range of motion analysis following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty, traditional total hip arthroplasty, and hip resurfacing. Journal of Arthroplasty 28 (7):1173–76. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.017.
- Krumholz, S. D., D. S. Egilman, and J. S. Ross. 2011. Study of neurontin: Titrate to effect, profile of safety (STEPS) trial: A narrative account of a gabapentin seeding trial. Arch Intern Med 171 (12):1100–07. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.241.
- Lainiala, O., A. Eskelinen, P. Elo, T. Puolakka, J. Korhonen, and T. Moilanen. 2014. Adverse reaction to metal debris is more common in patients following MoM total hip replacement with a 36 mm femoral head than previously thought. Bone & Joint Journal 96B (12):1610–17. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.96b12.33742.
- Langton, D. J., R. P. Sidaginamale, P. Avery, S. Waller, G. Tank, J. Lord, T. Joyce, N. Cooke, R. Logishetty, and A. V. F. Nargol. 2016. Retrospective cohort study of the performance of the Pinnacle metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacement: A single-centre investigation in combination with the findings of a national retrieval centre. BMJ Open 6 (4). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007847.
- LinkedIn. 0000. Amy Chan. Accessed September 5 2016. https://www.linkedin.com/in/amy-chan-857a4a64.
- Liudahl, A. A., S. S. Liu, D. D. Goetz, C. R. Mahoney, and J. J. Callaghan. 2013. Metal on metal total hip arthroplasty using modular acetabular shells. Journal of Arthroplasty 28 (5):867–71. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.019.
- Lohmann, C. H., H. Meyer, J. V. Nuechtern, G. Singh, S. Junk-Jantsch, H. Schmotzer, M. M. Morlock, and G. Pfluger. 2013. Periprosthetic tissue metal content but not serum metal content predicts the type of tissue response in failed small-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 95A (17):1561–68. doi:10.2106/jbjs.l.01273.
- Lombardi, A. V., K. R. Berend, M. J. Morris, J. B. Adams, and M. A. Sneller. 2015. Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: Dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 473 (2):509–20. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3976-0.
- Lundh, A., J. Lexchin, B. Mintzes, J. B. Schroll, and L. Bero. 2017. Industry sponsorship and research outcome (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2). doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3.
- Maloney, E., A. S. Ha, and T. T. Miller. 2015. Imaging of adverse reactions to metal debris. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology 19 (1):21–30. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396764.
- Matharu, G. S., K. Theivendran, P. B. Pynsent, L. Jeys, A. M. Pearson, and D. J. Dunlop. 2014. Outcomes of a metal-on-metal total hip replacement system. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 96 (7):530–35. doi:10.1308/003588414x14055925058030.
- Mihalko, W. M., M. A. Wimmer, C. A. Pacione, M. P. Laurent, R. F. Murphy, and C. Rider. 2014. How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 472 (12):3747–58. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3816-2.
- Plouhar, P. 2016a. Trial testimony. Pinnacle hip implant products liability litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 11–22, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 15. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2016.01.15%20Aoki%20Trial%20Vol%206%20pg%2011-22.pdf.
- Plouhar, P. 2016b. Trial testimony. Pinnacle hip implant products liability litigation. MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 8–9, 13–22, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, October 25. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/.
- Plouhar, P. 2016c. Trial testimony. Pinnacle hip implant products liability litigation. MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 8–11, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. January 15. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2016.01.15%20Aoki%20Trial%20Vol%206%20pg%208-11.pdf.
- Plouhar, P. 2016d. Trial testimony. Pinnacle hip implant products liability litigation. MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 202–27, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 14. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2016.01.14%20Aoki%20Trial%20Vol%205%20pg%20202-227.pdf.
- Plouhar, P. 2016e. Trial Testimony. Pinnacle hip implant products liability litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 87, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, October 20. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2016.10.20%20Andrews%20Trial%20Transcript%20Volume%2011%20Pg%2087.pdf.
- Plouhar, P. 2016f. Trial Testimony. Pinnacle hip implant products liability litigation, MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 176, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, January 14. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2016.01.14%20Aoki%20Trial%20Vol%205%20pg%20176.pdf.
- Plouhar, P. 2017. Trial Testimony. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. MDL Docket No. 3:11-MD-2244-K: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, 13–19, September 26. http://pinnaclehipdocuments.com/PIN%20Seeding%20Study/2017.09.26%20Alicea%20Trial%20Transcript%20Volume%205%20pg%2013-19.pdf.
- Plummer, D. R., H. G. Botero, K. R. Berend, J. W. Pritchett, A. V. Lombardi, and C. J. Della Valle. 2016. Salvage of Monoblock metal-on-metal acetabular components using a dual-mobility bearing. Journal of Arthroplasty 31 (4):846–49. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.016.
- Pope, C., S. Ziebland, and N. Mays. 2000. Qualitative research in Health Care: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ: British Medical Journal 320 (7227):114–16.
- Reito, A., O. Lainiala, P. Elo, and A. Eskelinen. 2016. Prevalence of failure due to adverse reaction to metal debris in modern, medium and large diameter metal-on-metal Hip replacements - the effect of novel screening methods: Systematic review and metaregression analysis. Plos One 11:3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147872.
- Ricciardi, B. F., A. A. Nocon, S. A. Jerabek, G. Wilner, E. Kaplowitz, S. R. Goldring, P. E. Purdue, and G. Perino. 2016. Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: A study of 285 cases. Bmc Clinical Pathology 16. doi:10.1186/s12907-016-0025-9.
- Schmitz, M., C. Timmer, W. H. C. Rijnen, J. W. M. Gardeniers, and B. W. Schreurs. 2013. Clinical and radiological outcome of the cemented Contemporary acetabular component in patients < 50 years of age. Bone & Joint Journal 95B (12):1617–25. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.95b12.31292.
- Singh, G., H. Meyer, M. Ruetschi, K. Chamaon, B. Feuerstein, and C. H. Lohmann. 2013. Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: A page in orthopedic history? Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 101 (11):3320–26. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34619.
- Singh, G., J. V. Nuechtern, H. Meyer, G. M. Fiedler, F. Awiszus, S. Junk-Jantsch, M. Bruegel, G. Pflueger, and C. H. Lohmann. 2015. Particle characterisation and cytokine expression in failed small-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties. Bone & Joint Journal 97B (7):917–23. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.97b7.35163.
- Smith, R. 2005. Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies. PLoS Medicine 2 (5):e138.
- Sox, H. C., and D. Rennie. 2008. Seeding trials: Just say “no”. Ann Intern Med 149 (4):279–80.
- Spurling, G. K., P. R. Mansfield, B. D. Montgomery, J. Lexchin, J. Doust, N. Othman, and A. I. Vitry. 2010. Information from pharmaceutical companies and the quality, quantity, and cost of physicians’ prescribing: A systematic review. PLoS Med 7 (10):e1000352. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352.
- Steinman, M. A., M. G. Shlipak, and S. J. McPhee. 2001. Of principles and pens: Attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions. Am J Med 110 (7):551–57.
- Steinman, M. A., L. A. Bero, M.-M. Chren, and C. Seth Landefeld. 2006. Narrative review: The promotion of gabapentin: An analysis of internal industry documents. Annals of Internal Medicine 145 (4):284–93. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00008.
- Stihsen, C., C. Rath, R. Radl, A. A. Saalabian, W. Materna, P. Rehak, and R. Windhager. 2013. Early migration characteristics of a 180 degrees porous-coated cup with 1-mm press fit. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 133 (5):707–12. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1713-x.
- Stryker, L. S., S. M. Odum, T. K. Fehring, and B. D. Springer. 2015. Revisions of Monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 473 (2):469–74. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3791-7.
- Swanson, A. 2015. Big pharmaceutical companies are spending far more on marketing than research. The Washington Post, February 11.
- Tsukagoshi, R., H. Tateuchi, Y. Fukumoto, H. Akiyama, K. So, Y. Kuroda, H. Okumura, and N. Ichihashi. 2015. Factors associated with restricted hip extension during gait in women after total hip arthroplasty. Hip International 25 (6):543–48. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000286.
- Tvermoes, B. E., D. J. Paustenbach, B. D. Kerger, B. L. Finley, and K. M. Unice. 2015. Review of cobalt toxicokinetics following oral dosing: Implications for health risk assessments and metal-on-metal hip implant patients. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 45 (5):367–87. doi:10.3109/10408444.2014.985818.
- USDOJ. 2007. “Five companies in Hip and Knee replacement industry avoid prosecution by agreeing to compliance rules and monitoring.” http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-nj/legacy/2013/11/29/hips0927.rel.pdf (accessed January 26, 2016).
- Voorhorst, P. 2012. DePuy ULTAMET® Metal-on-Metal Articulation. FDA www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/OrthopaedicandRehabilitationDevicesPanel/UCM310223.pdf (accessed May 20, 2016).
- Wagner, P., H. Olsson, J. Ranstam, O. Robertsson, M. H. Zheng, and L. Lidgren. 2012. Metal-on-metal joint bearings and hematopoetic malignancy A review. Acta Orthopaedica 83 (6):553–58. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.747055.
- Wyles, C. C., R. E. Van Demark, R. J. Sierra, and R. T. Trousdale. 2014. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 472 (2):509–16. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3157-6.