Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 25, 2018 - Issue 3
446
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions

, Ph.D., , Ph.D. & , Ph.D.

References

  • Abdul Karim, N. S., N. H. Ahmad Zamzuri, and Y. Muhammad Nor. 2009. Exploring the relationship between internet ethics in university students and the big five model of personality. Computer & Education 53 (1):86–93. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.001.
  • Abu Talib, N., S. Othman, K. C. Abdul Hamid, A. Zainuddin, and Z. Md Nen. 2013. An alternative dimension towards integrity: A perception of University researchers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 90:940–48. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.171.
  • Alberta, H. B., R. M. Berry, and A. D. Levine. 2014. Risk disclosure and the recruitment of oocytes donor: Are advertisers telling the full story? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (2):232–43. doi:10.1111/jlme.12138.
  • Amin, L., S. Z. Zainal, Z. Hassan, and M. Ibrahim. 2012. Factors contributing to research misconducts. The Social Sciences 7 (2):283–88. doi:10.3923/sscience.2012.283.288.
  • Anderson, M. S., and N. H. Steneck. 2011. The problem with plagiarism. Journal of Urologic Oncology 29 (1):90–94. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.013.
  • Anna, J., T. Koehlmoos, R. Smith, and L. L. Yan. 2013. Research misconduct in low and middle in- come countries. PLoS Med 10:3.
  • Appelbaum, P. S., and T. Grisso. 1995. Mental illness and competence to consent for treatment. Law and Human Behavior 19 (2):105–26. doi:10.1007/BF01499321.
  • Barrett, K. A., C. L. Funk, and F. L. Macrina. 2005. Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research. Accountability in Research 12 (3):193–206. doi:10.1080/08989620500217321.
  • Bennett, D. M., and D. M. Taylor. 2003. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine 15:263–70. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.
  • Bolin, A. 2004. Self-control, perceived opportunity and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Psychology 138:101–14. doi:10.3200/JRLP.138.2.101-114.
  • Chun, H. Q., N. Stewart, and C. L. Wai. 2012. Attitudes of business students’ toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):185–99. doi:10.1007/s10805-012-9157-4.
  • Claxton, L. D. 2005. Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research 589:31–45. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002.
  • Devlin, M., and K. Gray. 2007. In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research and Development 26 (2):181–98. doi:10.1080/07294360701310805.
  • Emmanuel, E. J., D. Wendler, and C. Grady. 2000. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283 (20):2701–11. doi:10.1001/jama.283.20.2701.
  • Floey, H. 1962. Prestige in academic scientific research. Nature 193 (4820):1017–28. doi:10.1038/1931017a0.
  • Galleta, A. 2013. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York and London: NYU Press.
  • Gilbert, F. G., and A. R. Dennison. 2003. Research misconduct. Clinical Radiology 58:499–504. doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00176-4.
  • Granitz, N., and D. Loewy. 2007. Applying ethical theories: Interpreting and responding to student plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics 72 (3):293–306. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9171-9.
  • Hathaway, et al. 2010. Whither RDS? An investigation of respondent driven sampling as a method of recruiting mainstream marijuana users. Harm Reduction Journal 7 (15):1–11. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-7-15.
  • Helgesson, G., and F. Eriksson. 2015. Plagiarism in research. Medical Health Care and Philosophy 18:91–101. doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9583-8.
  • Hixson, J. 1976. The patch work mouse. New York: Anchor/Doubleday Garden City.
  • Horner, J., and F. D. Minifie. 2011. Research ethics I: Responsible conduct of research (RCR)-Historical and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 54:S303–S329. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0265).
  • Hwang, W. S., S. I. Roh, B. C. Lee, et al. 2005. Patient specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT blastocyst. Science 308:1777–83. doi:10.1126/science.1112286.
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2010. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
  • Kim, J., and K. Park. 2013. Ethical modernization: Research misconduct and research ethics reforms in Korea following the Hwang affair. Science Engineering Ethics 19:355–80. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9341-8.
  • Kisamore, J. L., T. H. Stone, and I. M. Jawaharr. 2007. Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 32 (1):35–45.
  • Kitamura, T., and F. Kitamura. 2000. Reliability of clinical judgment of patients’ competency to give informed consent: A case vignette study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 54 (2):245–47. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00665.x.
  • Knox, R. A. 1983. Deeper problems for Darsee: Emory probe. Jama 249 (21):2867–76. doi:10.1001/jama.249.21.2867.
  • Kolar, R. 2006. Animal experimentation. Science Engineering Ethics Journal 12 (1):111–22. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0011-1.
  • Kumar, M. 2008. A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. Journal of Academic Ethics 6:211–28. doi:10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6.
  • Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Chapter 8: The quality of the interview 144–59. London: SAGE.
  • Looi, L. M., L. X. Wong, and C. C. Koh. 2015. Scientific misconduct encountered ny APAME journals: An online survey. Malaysian Journal of Pathology 27 (3):213–18.
  • Marsh, H. W., U. W. Jayasinghe, and N. W. Bond. 2008. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias and generalizability. American Psychologist 63 (3):160–68. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160.
  • McCabe, D. L., D. Butterfield, and L. K. Trevino. 2006. Academic dishonesty in graduate business program: Prevalence, causes and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning and Education 5:294–306. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2006.22697018.
  • Merton, R. K. 1979. Citation indexing-its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley (Foreword by E. Garfield).
  • Mullane, K., and M. Williams (2013). Bias in research: The rule rather than the exception? https://www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/publishing-ethics/bias-in-research-the-rule-rather-than-the-exception (accessed September 21, 2017).
  • Olesen, A. P., L. Amin, and Z. Mahadi. 2017a. Malaysian researchers talk about the influence of culture on research misconduct in higher learning institutions. Accountability in Research 24 (8):469–82. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1399358.
  • Olesen, A. P., L. Amin, and Z. Mahadi. 2017b. In their own words: Researchmisconduct from the perspective of researchers in Malaysian universities. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9.
  • Oliver, J. M., M. J. Slashinki, T. Wang, P. A. Kelly, S. G. Hilsenbeck, and A. L. McGuire. 2012. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: Genome research participants’ perspectives. Public Health Genomics 15:106–14. doi:10.1159/000334718.
  • Panigrah, S. K., M. R. Darun, M. Waris, and S. Kumar (2017). Promoting research governance through integrity and ethical practices: A qualitative study. Paper presented at FGIC 1st Conference on Governance & Integrity at Yayasan Pahang, Malaysia, from 3-4 April, 2017.
  • Park, C. 2003. In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (5):471–88. doi:10.1080/02602930301677.
  • Pfeiffer, T., L. Bertram, and J. P. A. Ionnidis. 2011. Quantifying selective reporting and the Proteus Phenomenon for multiple datasets with similar bias. PLoS One 6:e18362. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018362.
  • Post, S. G. 1991. The echo of Nuremberg: Nazi data and ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 17:42–44. doi:10.1136/jme.17.1.42.
  • Radelet, S., and B. Siddiqi. 2007. Global fund grant programs: An analysis of evaluation scores. Lancet 369:1807–13. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60818-6.
  • Rebbe, L. K. W. 1988. Misrepresentation, conversion and commercial human tissue research. Washington University Law Review 66 (3):643–69.
  • Redding, R. E. 1993. Children’s competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment. Washington and Lee Law Review 50:695–753.
  • Rezaeian, M. 2014. A review on the diverse types of research misconduct. Middle East. Journal of Family Medicine 12 (7):43–44.
  • Shi, L. 2006. Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriation. Language Awareness Journal 15 (4):264–82. doi:10.2167/la406.0.
  • Smith, M., N. Ghazali, and S. F. N. Minhad. 2007. Attitudes towards plagiarism among undergraduate accounting students: Malaysian evidence. Asian Review of Accounting 15 (2):122–46. doi:10.1108/13217340710823350.
  • Song-Turner, H. 2008. Plagiarism: Academic dishonesty or blind spot of multicultural education. Australian Universities’ Review 50 (2):39–50.
  • Stemwedel, J. D. 2013. The continuum between outright fraud and “sloppy science”: Inside the frauds of Diederik Stapel (part 5). Scientific American, June 26, 2013. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/doing-good-science/the-continuumbetween-outright-fraud-and-sloppy-science-inside-the-frauds-ofdiederik-stapel-part-5/ (accessed August 28, 2017).
  • Striker, R. B. 1985. Target platelet antigen in homosexual men with immune thrombocytopenia. The New England Journal of Medicine 313:1315–80.
  • Titus, S. L., J. A. Wells, and L. J. Rhoades. 2008. Repairing research integrity. Nature 453 (7198):980–82. doi:10.1038/453980a.
  • Vitse, C. L., and G. A. Poland. 2012. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, scientific misconduct and VACCINE: Protecting the science and the public. Vaccine 30 (50):7131–33. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.053.
  • Vollmann, J., and R. Winau. 1996. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. British Medical Journal 313:1445–47. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1445.
  • Wager, E. 2009. Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters? Maturitas 62 (2):109–12. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.001.
  • Weed, D. L. 1998. Preventing scientific misconduct. Health Law and Ethics 88 (1):125–29.
  • Weijer, C., and E. J. Emanuel. 2000. Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science 289:1142–44. doi:10.1126/science.289.5482.1142.
  • Yusof, D. S. M., and U. K. Masrom. 2012. Malaysian students’ understanding of plagiarism. The International Journal-Language Society and Culture. www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL/.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.