Preregistering qualitative research

References

• Blaikie, N. 2007. Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. 2015. “Many Psychology Papers Fail Replication Test.” Science 349 (6251): 910–911. doi:10.1126/science.349.6251.910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A. 2017. “Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.” In Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment, 187–199. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9.
   Google Scholar
• Casadevall, A., and F. C. Fang. 2012. “Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms.” Infection and Immunity 80 (3): 891–896. doi:10.1128/IAI.06183-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, L. C., and M. Niederle. 2015. “Pre-Analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 81–98. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd [rev.] ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. Lincoln. 1998. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Paperback. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1991. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishers Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. 2003. “Hierarchy of Evidence.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 12: 77–84. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00662.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.” PloS One 4 (5): e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetzer, James, "Carl Hempel", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( Fall 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),URL:https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/hempel/.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G, and Anselm Leonard Strauss. 1967. The Discovery Of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., and N. Thorogood. 2014. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. Introducing Qualitative Methods. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grypdonck, M. H. F. 2006. “Qualitative Health Research in the Era of Evidence-Based Practice.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (10): 1371–1385. doi:10.1177/1049732306294089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture LK. Repr. London SE: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M., R. Sanchez de la Sierra, and P. Van der Windt. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1093/pan/mps021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, JP. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings are False.” Plos Medicine 2 (8): e124.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F. G., and K. S. Gleditsch. 2017. “Exploring Pre-Registration and Pre-Analysis Plans for Qualitative Inference.” Preprint ahead of publication 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Labuschagne, A. 2003. “The Qualitative Report Qualitative Research -Airy Fairy or Fundamental?” The Qualitative Report 8 (1): 100–103. doi:10.2514/6.1986-1409.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, M. 2003. “Health Technology Assessment: The Contribution of Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 19 (2): 317–329. doi:10.1017/S026646230300028X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (7043): 737–738. doi:10.1038/435737a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel, E., C. Camerer, K. Casey, J. Cohen, K. Esterling, A. Gerber, R. Glennerster, et al. 2014. “Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research.” Science 343 (6166): 30–31. doi:10.1021/nn300902w.Release.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J., G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe, Eds. 2010. “Encyclopedia of Case Study Research.” Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, 1152. doi:10.4135/9781412957397.
   Google Scholar
• Munafò, M. R., B. A. Nosek, D. V. M. Bishop, K. S. Button, C. D. Chambers, N. P. Du Sert, U. Simonsohn, E. J. Wagenmakers, J. J. Ware, and J. P. A. Ioannidis. 2017. “A Manifesto for Reproducible Science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B., C. R. Ebersole, A. C. DeHaven, and D. T. Mellor. 2018. “The Preregistration Revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017: 201708274. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B., G. C. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. D. Bowman, S. J. Breckler, S. Buck, and C. D. Chambers, et al. 2015. “Promoting an Open Research Culture.” Science 348 (6242): 1422-1425. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perezgonzalez, J. D. 2015. “Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A Tutorial for Teaching Data Testing.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñeiro, R., and F. Rosenblatt. 2016. “Pre-Analysis Plans for Qualitative Research.” Revista de Ciencia Política 36 (3): 785–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, and R. Ormston. 2013. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T., and E. Halpern. 1988. Linking Auditing and Metaevaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412984768.
   Google Scholar
• Toews, I., A. Booth, R. C. Berg, S. Lewin, C. Glenton, H. M. Munthe-Kaas, J. Noyes, S. Schroter, and J. J. Meerpohl. 2017. “Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: Conceptual Considerations.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar