References
- Artino, A. R., Jr., E. W. Driessen, and L. A. Maggio. 2019. “Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education.” Academic Medicine 94 (1): 76–84. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412.
- Broome, M. E., E. Pryor, B. Habermann, L. Pulley, and H. Kincaid. 2005. “The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire–Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and Psychometric Testing.” Accountability in Research 12 (4): 263–280. doi:10.1080/08989620500440253.
- DuBois, J. M., E. E. Anderson, J. Chibnall, K. Carroll, T. Gibb, C. Ogbuka, and T. Rubbelke. 2013. “Understanding Research Misconduct: A Comparative Analysis of 120 Cases of Professional Wrongdoing.” Accountability in Research 20 (5–6): 320–338. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822248.
- Fanelli, D. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS One 4 (5): e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
- Fanelli, D., R. Costas, and V. Lariviere. 2015. “Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.” PLoS One 10 (6): e0127556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127556.
- Fang, F. C., J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall. 2013. “Males are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct.” Mbio 4 (1): e00640–12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00640-12.
- George, S. L. 2016. “Research Misconduct and Data Fraud in Clinical Trials: Prevalence and Causal Factors.” International Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3.
- Habermann, B., M. Broome, E. R. Pryor, and K. W. Ziner. 2010. “Research Coordinators’ Experiences with Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity.” Nursing Research 59 (1): 51–57. doi:10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3b9f2.
- Holm, S., and B. Hofmann. 2017. “Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman’s “Survey 2: Research Misconduct” Questionnaire: A Post Hoc Analysis among Biomedical Doctoral Students in Scandinavia.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12 (4): 199–205. doi:10.1177/1556264617714658.
- Holm, S., and B. Hofmann. 2018. “Associations between Attitudes Towards Scientific Misconduct and Self-reported Behavior.” Accountability in Research 25 (5): 290–300. doi:10.1080/08989621.2018.1485493.
- Lei, L. 2019. “The Newest Retractions in 2019: 447 Retrated Papers Hit a New High, Top 2 are Chinese Academy of Sciences and Zhejiang University.” Wechat Official Account Iplagiarism, December 22. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Q2s8cj8ZjNJuQbINQLBEbA (in Chinese).
- Macrina, F. L. 2014. Scientific Integrity: Text and Cases in Responsible Conduct of Research. 4th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
- Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (7043): 737–738. doi:10.1038/435737a.
- MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology), National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Education, Ministry of industry and information technology, Ministry of finance, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of human resources and social security, et al. 2016. “Interim Provisions on the Record of Serious Dishonesty in National Science and Technology Plans (Special Projects, Funds, Etc.).” March 25. Accessed 17 January 2017. http://www.most.gov.cn/kjzc/gjkjzc/kjjhgl/201701/t20170117_130543.htm (in Chinese).
- Okonta, P., and T. Rossouw. 2013. “Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria.” Developing World Bioethics 13 (3): 149–157. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x.
- Okonta, P. I., and T. Rossouw. 2014. “Misconduct in Research: A Descriptive Survey of Attitudes, Perceptions and Associated Factors in a Developing Country.” BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1): 25. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
- Qi, X., H. Deng, and X. Guo. 2017. “Characteristics of Retractions Related to Faked Peer Reviews: An Overview.” Postgraduate Medical Journal 93 (1102): 499–503. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133969.
- Stigbrand, T. 2017. “Retraction Note to Multiple Articles in Tumor Biology.” Tumor Biology. doi:10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.
- Tang, L. 2019. “Five Ways China Must Cultivate Research Integrity (Vol 575, Pg 589, 2019).” Nature 575 (7784): 7784. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03613-1.
- Tijdink, J. K., L. M. Bouter, C. L. Veldkamp, P. M. van de Ven, J. M. Wicherts, and Y. M. Smulders. 2016. “Personality Traits are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study.” PLoS One 11 (9): e0163251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163251.
- Tijdink, J. K., R. Verbeke, and Y. M. Smulders. 2014. “Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5): 64–71. doi:10.1177/1556264614552421.
- Wang, L. D., and Z. H. Liu. 2019. “Keeping a Clean Research Environment: Addressing Research Misconduct and Improving Scientific Integrity in China.” Cancer Letters 464: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2019.08.006.
- Yi, N., B. Nemery, and K. Dierickx. 2019a. “Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4): 1271–1301. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0057-x.
- Yi, N., B. Nemery, and K. Dierickx. 2019b. “Perceptions of Research Integrity and the Chinese Situation: In-depth Interviews with Chinese Biomedical Researchers in Europe.” Accountability in Research 26 (7): 405–426. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1652096.
- Yu, P. X., X. N. Yang, and Z. L. Qi. 2017. “Evaluation of Doctors in China: Imperative Changes are Required.” Lancet 390 (10090): 121. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31593-3.
- Zhang, P. J., B. Peng, Q. Gao, L. L. Yu, M. Miao, and Y. T. Du. 2019. “Investigation and Analysis on the Status Quo of Education and Management on Research Integrity: Tacking Hospitals, Medical Colleges and Medical Research Institutes for Example.” Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management 32 (5): 321–324. doi:10.3760/cma.j..1006-1924.2019.05.001.