Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 30, 2023 - Issue 4
569
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group

, , , ORCID Icon &

References

  • Antes, A. L., A. Kuykendall, and J. M. DuBois. 2019. “The Lab Management Practices of ‘Research Exemplars’ that Foster Research Rigor and Regulatory Compliance: A Qualitative Study of Successful Principal Investigators.” PLoS ONE 14 (4): e0214595. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214595.
  • Antes, A. L., A. Mart, and J. M. DuBois. 2016. “Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11 (5): 408–423. doi:10.1177/1556264616668775.
  • Barker, K. 2010. At the Helm: Leading Your Laboratory. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Bradley, E. H., L. A. Curry, and K. J. Devers. 2007. “Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory.” Health Services Research 42 (4): 1758–1772. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.
  • DuBois, J. M., and A. L. Antes. 2018. “Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating A Climate of Research Integrity.” Academic Medicine 93 (4): 550–555. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001966.
  • Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
  • Ferrell, O. C., J. Fraedrich, and L. Ferrell. 2019. Business Ethics. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Greenberg, D. 2001. Science, Money, and Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Guest, G., E. Namey, and K. McKenna. 2017. “How Many Focus Groups are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes.” Field Methods 29 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1177/1525822X16639015.
  • Haven, T., H. R. Pasman, G. Widdershoven, L. Bouter, and J. Tijdink. 2020. “Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6): 3017–3036. doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00256-8.
  • Hofman, B., and S. Holm. 2019. “Research Integrity: Environment, Experience, or Ethos?” Research Ethics 15 (3–4): 1–13. doi:10.1177/1747016119880844.
  • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lexchin, J. 2012. “Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases the Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2): 247–261. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9265-3.
  • Macrina, F. L., ed. 2014. Scientific Integrity. 4th ed. Herndon, VA: American Society for Microbiology Press.
  • Martinson, B., C. R. Thrush, and L. A. Crain. 2013. “Development and Validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3): 813–834. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7.
  • Martinson, B. C., A. L. Crain, R. De Vries, and M. S. Anderson. 2010. “The Importance of Organizational Justice in Ensuring Research Integrity.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5 (3): 67–83. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.67.
  • McIntosh, T., C. Sanders, and A. L. Antes. 2020. “Leading the People and Leading the Work: Practical Considerations for Ethical Research.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science 6 (3): 257–270. doi:10.1037/tps0000260.
  • Merton, R. L. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Michaels, D. 2008. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Mumford, M. D., S. T. Murphy, S. Connelly, J. H. Hill, A. L. Antes, R. P. Brown, and L. D. Devenport. 2007. “Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity.” Ethics & Behavior 17 (4): 337–366. doi:10.1080/10508420701519510.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. On Being a Scientist. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • O’Riordan, L., and J. Fairbrass. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue.” Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4): 745–758. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9662-y.
  • Resnik, D. B. 2001. “Developing Drugs for the Developing World: An Economic, Legal, Moral, and Political Dilemma.” Developing World Bioethics 1 (1): 11–32. doi:10.1111/1471-8847.00004.
  • Resnik, D. B. 2007. The Price of Truth: How Money Affects the Norms of Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Resnik, D. B. 2019. “Stewardship of Research Resources.” Accountability in Research 26 (3): 246–251. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1585819.
  • Schneider, B., M. G. Ehrhart, and W. H. Macey. 2013. “Organizational Climate and Culture.” Annual Review of Psychology 64 (1): 361–388. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809.
  • Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2006. “Ethical Issues for Clinical Research Managers.” Drug Information Journal 40 (4): 371–383. doi:10.1177/216847900604000402.
  • Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible Conduct of Research. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Shaw, W. H. 2016. Business Ethics. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
  • Solomon, E. D., T. English, M. Wroblewski, J. M. Dubois, and A. L. Antes. 2021. “Assessing the Climate for Research Ethics in Labs: Development and Validation of a Brief Measure.” Accountability in Research and Practice 1–16. Published online 4 February 2021. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1881891.
  • Steneck, N. 2006. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research. Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity.
  • Stewart, N. 2011. Research Ethics for Scientists. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Thomas, R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.