Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study

References

• Bennett, D. M., and D. Taylor. 2003. “Unethical Practices in Authorship of Scientific Papers“. Emergency Medicine Australasia 15 (3):263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. M., and H. Gadlin. 2012. “Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice“. Journal of Investigative Medicine 60 (5):768–775. 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. M., H. Gadlin, and C. Marchand. 2018. Collaboration and Team Science: Field Guide: Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/crs/research-initiatives/team-science-field-guide/collaboration-team-science-guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, J., and A. E. Shamoo. 2015. “Rethinking Authorship in the Era of Collaborative Research“. Accountability in Research 22 (5):267–283. 10.1080/08989621.2014.968277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and J. Youtie. 2016. “Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring“. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (6):1717–1743. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljan, I., L. Barać, and M. Ana. 2018. “How Researchers Perceive Research Misconduct in Biomedicine and How They Would Prevent It: A Qualitative Study in A Small Scientific Community“. Accountability in Research 25 (4):220–238. 10.1080/08989621.2018.1463162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). “How to Handle Authorship Disputes“. 2018. COPE, Accessed 20 October 2021. https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/how-handle-authorship-disputesa-guide-new-researchers
   Google Scholar
• Cutas, D., and D. Shaw. 2015. “Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement“. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1315–1329. 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadlin, H., and K. Jessar. 2002. “Preempting Discord: Prenuptial Agreements for Scientists“. The NIH Catalyst 10 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Gaffey, A. 2021. “Determining and Negotiating Authorship 26 February 2021“. American Psychological Association, Accessed February 26. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2015/06/determining-authorship
   Google Scholar
• Heard, S. B. 2016. The Scientist’s Guide to Writing: How to Write More Easily and Effectively Throughout Your Scientific Career. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors). 2021. “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals“. Accessed October 20, 2021. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
   Google Scholar
• ICRE (Institute for Clinical Research Education). ICRE Home Page. University of Pittsburgh, Institute for Clinical Research Education. Accessed 25 February 2021. https://www.icre.pitt.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, L. S. 2005. “The White Bull Effect: Abusive Coauthorship and Publication Parasitism“. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):554–556. 10.1136/jme.2004.010553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio, L. A., A. R. Artino Jr, K. Picho, and E. W. Driessen. 2018. “Are You Sure You Want to Do That? Fostering the Responsible Conduct of Medical Education Research“. Academic Medicine 93 (4):544–549. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, A. Lauren Crain, and R. De Vries. 2006. “Scientists’ Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-reported Misbehaviors“. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (1):51–66. 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić, A., L. Bošnjak, and J. Ana. 2011. “A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines“. Plos One 6 (9):e23477. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt, B. 2011. “Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship“. Accountability in Research 18 (2):76–90. 10.1080/08989621.2011.557297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt, B. 2018. “Scientific Authorship, Pluralism, and Practice“. Accountability in Research 25 (4):199–211. 10.1080/08989621.2018.1437347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research: National Academies Press. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, M. K., C. A. Mayowski, and M. J. Fine. 2020. “Authorship Stories Panel Discussion: Fostering Ethical Authorship by Cultivating a Growth Mindset“. Accountability in Research 2: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Phillippi, J. C., F. E. Likis, and E. L. Tilden. 2018. “Authorship Grids: Practical Tools to Facilitate Collaboration and Ethical Publication“. Research in Nursing & Health 41 (2):195–208. 10.1002/nur.21856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primack, R., J. Cigliano, and C. Parsons. 2014. “Editorial: Co-authors Gone Bad—how to Avoid Publishing Conflicts Five Examples of Conflicts among Co-authors“. Biological Conservation 176:277–280. 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. M., C. E. Williams, M. M. Hausfeld, G. C. Banks, and B. C. Davis. 2020 Science and Engineering Ethics: 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, D., V. Yank, and L. Emanuel. 1997. “When Authorship Fails: A Proposal to Make Contributors Accountable“. JAMA 278 (7):579–585. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., and Z. Master. 2011. “Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics“. The American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17–21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.603795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. W. 2017. “Addressing Authorship Issues Prospectively: A Heuristic Approach“. Academic Medicine 92 (2):143–146. doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000001285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeman, J. I., and M. C. House. 2015. “Authorship Issues and Conflict in the US Academic Chemical Community“. Accountability in Research 22 (6):346–383. 10.1080/08989621.2015.1047707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and B. Williams-Jones. 2012. “Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-author Studies“. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):199–212. 10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., B. Williams-Jones, Z. Master, V. Larivière, C. R. Sugimoto, A. Paul-Hus, M. Shi, and D. B. Resnik. 2019b. “Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26, no. 4: 1967–1993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., B. Williams-Jones, Z. Master, V. Larivière, C. R. Sugimoto, A. Paul-Hus, M. Shi, E. Diller, K. Caudle, and D. B. Resnik. 2019a. “Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams“. Science and Engineering Ethics 26, no. 4: 1995–2022. 10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and Z. Master. 2017. “Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications“. Accountability in Research 24 (4):243–267. 10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1997. “Misconduct in Research: Editors Respond: The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Is Formed.“ BMJ 315: 201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2016. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. Accessed 20 October 2021. https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/history-of-stata/
   Google Scholar
• Tang, B. L. 2018. “Letter to the Editor: On Plurality and Authorship in Science“. Accountability in Research 25 (4):254–258. 10.1080/08989621.2018.1457959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uijtdehaage, S., B. Mavis, and S. J. Durning. 2018. “Whose Paper Is It Anyway? Authorship Criteria according to Established Scholars in Health Professions Education“. Academic Medicine 93 (8):1171–1175. doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAME (World Association of Medical Editors). “Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals“. 2016. Accessed 14 February 2021. https://wame.org/recommendations-on-publication-ethics-policies-for-medical-journals
   Google Scholar
• Wislar, J. S., A. Flanagin, P. B. Fontanarosa, and D. D. Catherine. 2011. “Honorary and Ghost Authorship in High Impact Biomedical Journals: A Cross Sectional Survey“. BMJ 343:d6128. 10.1136/bmj.d6128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo-Teh, N., S. Ling, and B. L. Tang. 2021. Research Ethics 17(1) : 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Youtie, J., and B. Bozeman. 2014. “Social Dynamics of Research Collaboration: Norms, Practices, and Ethical Issues in Determining Co-authorship Rights“. Scientometrics 101 (2):953–962. 10.1007/s11192-014-1391-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youtie, J., and B. Bozeman. 2016. “Dueling Co-Authors: How Collaborators Create and Sometimes Solve Contributorship Conflicts“. Minerva 54 (4):375–397. doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9303-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar