Citation bias, diversity, and ethics

References

• Ahmed, S. 2013. “Making Feminist Points.” Feministkilljoys.com. https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2019. What’s the Use? Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. P., J. W. Schneider, R. Jagsi, and M. W. Nielsen. 2019. “Meta-Research: Gender Variations in Citation Distributions in Medicine are Very Small and Due to self-citation and Journal Prestige.” eLife 8: e45374. doi:10.7554/eLife.45374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechdel, A. 1986. Dykes to Watch Out for. Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolero, M. A., J. D. Dworkin, S. U. David, C. López Lloreda, P. Srivastava, J. Stiso, D. Zhou, K. Dzirasa, D. A. Fair, A. N. Kaczkurkin, et al. 2020. “Racial and Ethnic Imbalance in Neuroscience Reference Lists and Intersections with Gender.” BioRxiv no. October 12. Accessed January 31 2022. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.12.336230v1.abstract
   Google Scholar
• Bible, King James Version. 2022 [1611]. Accessed January 28 2022. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Matthew-13-12/
   Google Scholar
• Bouter, L. M., J. Tijdink, N. Axelsen, B. C. Martinson, and G. ter Riet. 2016. “Ranking Major and Minor Research Misbehaviors: Results from a Survey among Participants of Four World Conferences on Research Integrity.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaham, M., R. L. Wears, and E. Weber. 2002. “Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated with Citation of Published Studies in peer-reviewed Journals.” Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (21): 2847–2850. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplar, N., S. Tacchella, and S. Birrer. 2017. “Quantitative Evaluation of Gender Bias in Astronomical Publications from Citation Counts.” Nature Astronomy 1 (6): 0141. doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. R., D. C. Cone, C. C. Sarli, and G. M. Gaddis. 2014. “Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact.” Academic Emergency Medicine 21 (10): 1160–1172. doi:10.1111/acem.12482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cell Press. 2022. “Cell Press Inclusion and Diversity Form.” Accessed January 29 2022. https://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/shared/forms/IandDstatement_form.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., R. Kuo, V. Grubbs, and C. McIlwain. 2018. “#Communicationsowhite.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 254–266. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., and R. M. Werner. 2021. “Gender Disparity in Citations in high-impact Journal Articles.” JAMA Network Open 4 (7): e2114509. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cite Black Women. 2022. “Home.” Accessed January 29 2022. https://www.citeblackwomencollective.org/
   Google Scholar
• Curry, S. 2018. “Let’s Move beyond the Rhetoric: It’s Time to Change How We Judge Research.” Nature 554 (7691): 147. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-01642-w.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R. 1984. “The Imperial Scholar: Reflections on a Review of Civil Rights Literature.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132 (3): 561–578. doi:10.2307/3311882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, M., J. Sumner, and S. Mitchell. 2018. “Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 312–327. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyx, B., M. J. E. Urlings, G. M. H. Swaen, L. M. Bouter, and M. P. Zeegers. 2017. “Scientific Citations Favor Positive Results: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, J. D., K. A. Linn, E. G. Teich, P. Zurn, R. T. Shinohara, and D. S. Bassett. 2020a. “The Extent and Drivers of Gender Imbalance in Neuroscience Reference Lists.” Nature Neuroscience 23 (8): 918–926. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, J., P. Zurn, and D. S. Bassett. 2020b. “(In)citing Action to Realize an Equitable Future.” Neuron 106 (6): 890–894. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. 2006. “Theory and Practise of the g-index.” Scientometrics 69 (1): 131–152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else, H. 2019. “Impact Factors are Still Widely Used in Academic Evaluations.” Nature no. Apr 11 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-0658-y
   Google Scholar
• Fang, D., E. Moy, L. Colburn, and J. Hurley. 2000. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Faculty Promotion in Academic Medicine.” Journal of the American Medical Association 284 (9): 1085–1092. doi:10.1001/jama.284.9.1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferber, M. A., and M. Brun. 2011. “The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist?” Feminist Economics 17 (1): 151–158. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.541857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, C., A. Martin, D. Berner, and S. Hurst. 2019. “Interventions Designed to Reduce Implicit Prejudices and Implicit Stereotypes in Real World Contexts: A Systematic Review.” BMC Psychology 7 (1): 29. doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, N. 2020. “Diversity in Science: Next Steps for Research Group Leaders.” Nature, September 23. Accessed January 31 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02681-y
   Google Scholar
• Fulvio, J. M., I. Akinnola, and B. R. Postle. 2021. “Gender (Im)balance in Citation Practices in Cognitive Neuroscience.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 33 (1): 3–7. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage, M. J. 1883. “Woman as Inventor.” North American Review 136 (318): 478–489.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1972. “Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation.” Science 178 (4060): 471–479. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 1991. “Bibliographic Negligence: A Serious Transgression.” The Scientist 5 (23): 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingras, Y. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginther, D. K., W. T. Schaffer, J. Schnell, B. Masimore, F. Liu, L. L. Haak, and R. Kington. 2011. “Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards.” Science 333 (6045): 1015–1019. doi:10.1126/science.1196783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, C. J., A. C. Herman, and P. Parigi 2022. “Leading Countries in Global Science Increasingly Receive More Citations than Other Countries Doing Similar Research.” Nature Human Behavior, May 30. Accessed July 21 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01351-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grange, R. I. 1999. “National Bias in Citations in Urology Journals: Parochialism or Availability?” BJU International 84 (6): 601–603. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00267.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., and E. S. Schuh. 1994. “An Ethnic Bias in Scientific Citations.” European Journal of Social Psychology 24 (6): 623–639. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K. L., A. L. Vogel, G. C. Huang, K. J. Serrano, E. L. Rice, S. P. Tsakraklides, and S. M. Fiore. 2018. “The Science of Team Science: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps on Collaboration in Science.” American Psychologist 73 (4): 532–548. doi:10.1037/amp0000319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102 (46): 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstra, B., V. V. Kulkarni, S. Munoz-Najar Galvez, B. He, D. Jurafsky, and D. A. McFarland. 2020. “The diversity-innovation Paradox in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (17): 9284–9291. doi:10.1073/pnas.1915378117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ira, P. 2020. “The Real Difference between Diversity and Tokenism.” An Injustice!, August 26. Accessed February 10 2022. https://aninjusticemag.com/the-real-difference-between-diversity-and-tokenism-why-they-matter-1e5b2be97edb
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. M., A. L. Hillard, and T. R. Schneider. 2014. “Using Implicit Bias Training to Improve Attitudes toward Women in STEM.” Social Psychology of Education 17 (3): 419–438. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9259-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannot, A. S., T. Agoritsas, A. Gayet-Ageron, and T. V. Perneger. 2013. “Citation Bias Favoring Statistically Significant Studies Was Present in Medical Research.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66 (3): 296–301. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFollette, M. 1992. Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., C. Ni, Y. Gingras, B. Cronin, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2013. “Bibliometrics: Global Gender Disparities in Science.” Nature 504 (7479): 211–213. doi:10.1038/504211a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahian, O., and S. Wongwises. 2015. “Is It Ethical for Journals to Request self-citation?” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2): 531–533. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9540-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., R. Powers, and B. F. Walter. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889–922. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2022. “Avoiding plagiarism—cite Your Source.” Accessed February 1 2022. https://integrity.mit.edu/handbook/citing-your-sources/avoiding-plagiarism-cite-your-source
   Google Scholar
• McNutt, M., and L. Castillo-Page. 2021. “Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in STEMM Starts at the Top.” Nature Medicine 27 (11): 1864–1865. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01496-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1979. The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirnezami, S. R., C. Beaudry, and V. Larivière. 2016. “What Determines Researchers’ Scientific Impact? A Case Study of Quebec Researchers.” Science & Public Policy 43 (2): 262–274. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mott, C., and D. Cockayne. 2017. “Citation Matters: Mobilizing the Politics of Citation toward a Practice of ‘Conscientious Engagement.’ Gender, Place, & Culture.” A Journal of Feminist Geography 24 (7): 954–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. 2020. “Citational Desires: On Black Feminism’s Institutional Longings.” Diacritics 48 (3): 76–91. doi:10.1353/dia.2020.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Promising Practices for Addressing the Underrepresentation of Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Addressing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Anti-Racism in 21st Century STEMM Organizations: Proceedings of a Workshop in Brief. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2019. “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering.” Accessed July 18 2022. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/women/
   Google Scholar
• Office of Research Integrity. 2022. “Ethically Questionable Citation Practices.” Accessed January 9 2022. https://ori.hhs.gov/ethically-questionable-citation-practices
   Google Scholar
• Olson, S. 2020. “Tokenism: What It Is & How It Affects Our Workplaces.” Inhersight, December 10. Accessed 10 February 2022. https://www.inhersight.com/blog/diversity/tokenism
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Reference. 2022. “Tokenism.” Accessed February 10 2022. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803104818992
   Google Scholar
• Pagel, P. S., and J. A. Hudetz. 2011. “An Analysis of Scholarly Productivity in United States Academic Anaesthesiologists by Citation Bibliometrics.” Anaesthesia 66 (10): 873–878. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06860.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, G., G. De Leo, P. Menozzi, and M. Gatto. 1998. “Region-based Citation Bias in Science.” Nature 396 (6708): 210. doi:10.1038/24249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasterkamp, G., J. Rotmans, D. de Kleijn, and C. Borst. 2007. “Citation Frequency: A Biased Measure of Research Impact Significantly Influenced by the Geographical Origin of Research Articles.” Scientometrics 70 (1): 153–165. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0109-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny, M., R. Jeffries, J. Grant, and S. C. Davies. 2017. “Women and Academic Medicine: A Review of the Evidence on Female Representation.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 107 (7): 259–263. doi:10.1177/0141076814528893.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D. P., and S. J. Ceci. 1982. “Peer-review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Accepted, Published Articles, Submitted Again.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2): 187–195. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00011183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. M., S. Fortunato, R. K. Pan, K. Kaski, O. Penner, A. Rungi, M. Riccaboni, H. E. Stanley, and F. Pammolli. 2014. “Reputation and Impact in Academic Careers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111 (43): 15316–15321. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323111111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, V. 2018. “The Racial Politics of Citation. Inside Higher Education.” April 27. Accessed January 31 2022. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/04/27/racial-exclusions-scholarly-citations-opinion
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. 2005. “Affirmative Action in Science and Engineering.” Science & Education 14 (1): 75–93. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-4221-0.
   Google Scholar
• Rossen, K., and K. A. Miller. 2021. “Citation Bias in Organic Chemistry Research: Are industry-affiliated Papers Cited Less Often?” Organic Process Research & Development 25 (2): 167–168. doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, M. W. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–341. doi:10.1177/030631293023002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. 2016. “The Multiple Dimensions of Race.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (8): 1310–1338. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1140793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowson, B., S. M. Duma, M. R. King, I. Efimov, A. Saterbak, and N. C. Chesler. 2021. “Citation Diversity Statements in BMES Journals.” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 49 (3): 947–949. doi:10.1007/s10439-021-02739-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, T. H., A. G. Palermo, S. K. Masur, and J. A. Aberg. 2019. “The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity.” The Journal of Infectious Diseases 220 (Supplement_2): S33–S41. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2022. Responsible Conduct of Research. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiso, J., K. Oudyk, M. Bertolero, D. Zhou, E. Teich, D. Lydon-Staley, P. Zurn, and D. S. Bassett 2022. “Modeling Observed Gender Imbalances in Academic Citation Practices.” Accessed July 26 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12555
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. 2017. Transgender History. New York, NY: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, D. 2021. “New at Cell Press: The Inclusion and Diversity Statement.” Cell 184 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffe, M. A., and N. W. Gilpin. 2021. “Equity, Diversity and Inclusion: Racial Inequity in Grant Funding from the US National Institutes of Health.” eLife 10: e65697. doi:10.7554/eLife.65697.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teplitskiy, M., E. Duede, M. Menietti, and K. R. Lakhani. 2022. “How Status of Research Papers Affects the Way They are Read and Cited.” Research Policy 51 (4): 104484. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., and K. Kousha. 2021. “Researchers’ Attitudes Towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: Criticism and Acceptance.” Scientometrics 126 (6): 5361–5368. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03961-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, H. H. 2022. “Science Needs Affirmative Action.” Science 375 (6580): 473. doi:10.1126/science.abo3934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCLA College of Social Sciences. 2017. “Women are Making Progress toward Balance in the Social Sciences.” Blog, August 9. Accessed February 8 2022. https://socialsciences.ucla.edu/2017/08/09/women-making-progress-on-the-road-to-gender-balance-in-the-social-sciences/
   Google Scholar
• Urlings, M. J. E., B. Duyx, G. M. H. Swaen, L. M. Bouter, and M. P. Zeegers. 2021. “Citation Bias and Other Determinants of Citation in Biomedical Research: Findings from Six Citation Networks.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 132: 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, S., D. Vasgird, I. Ichikawa, and D. Plemmons. 2014. “Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems?” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15 (2): 155–158. Accessed July 18 2022. https://journals.asm.org/doi/epub/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.867
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, X., J. D. Dworkin, D. Zhou, J. Stiso, E. B. Falk, D. S. Bassett, P. Zurn, and D. M. Lydon-Staley. 2021. “Gendered Citation Practices in the Field of Communication.” Annals of the International Communication Association 45 (2): 134–153. doi:10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Way, S. F., A. C. Morgan, D. B. Larremore, and A. Clauset. 2019. “Productivity, Prominence, and the Effects of Academic Environment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 116 (22): 10729–10733. doi:10.1073/pnas.1817431116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurn, P., D. S. Bassett, and N. C. Rust. 2020. “The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24 (9): 669–672. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar