Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe

References

• All European Academies (ALLEA). 2017. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin: All European Academies. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aubert Bonn, N., S. Godecharle, and K. Dierickx. 2017. “European Universities’ Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12 (1): 33–44. doi:10.1177/1556264616688980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouter, L. M. 2018. “Fostering Responsible Research Practices is a Shared Responsibility of Multiple Stakeholders.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 96: 143–146. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouter, L. M., and S. Hendrix. 2017. “Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection.” Accountability in Research 24 (6): 359–366. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1327814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative Working Group from the conference “Keeping the Pool Clean: Prevention and Management of Misconduct Related Retractions”. 2018. “RePair Consensus Guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in Protecting the Integrity of the Research Record.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0055-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CORDIS – Community Research And Development Information Service. 2017. “Mapping Normative Frameworks for Ethic and Integrity of Research (EnTire) Project.” https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/741782/en
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, H., and K. Dierickx. 2021. “Research Integrity Codes of Conduct in Europe: Understanding the Divergences.” Bioethics 35 (5): 414–428. doi:10.1111/bioe.12851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian, A. 1992. “Quality Assurance. Structure, Process, Outcome.” Nursing Standards 7 (11 Suppl QA): 4–51. doi:10.7748/ns.7.11.4.s71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Embassy of Good Science. 2022. “Country Report Cards.” https://embassy.science/wikiwiki/index.php/Special:BrowseData/Report?_search_Report_Type%5B0%5D=Country+Report+Cards
   Google Scholar
• Engh, E. 2017.”Country Report Card on Research Integrity: Norway – a Broad Approach.” Presentation at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity, Amsterdam, 28-31 May 2017. https://wcrif.org/images/2017/documents/3.%20Wednesday%20May%2031,%202017/1.%20Aula/E.%20Engh%20-%20Country%20report%20card%20on%20research%20integrity%20-%20Norway%20-%20a%20broad%20approach%20to%20research%20integrity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2018. “Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Research Integrity.” https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/statistics/policy-support-facility/mle-research-integrity
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2021. “Horizon Europe Programme. Standard Application Form (RIA, IA). Version 2.0.” European Commission, April 22. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/temp-form/af/af_he-ria-ia_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation (ESF). 2011. “Fostering Research Integrity in Europe.” https://www.esf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/esf/ResearchIntegrity_Report2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK). 2012. “Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Finland.” https://tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK). 2021. “The Responsible Conduct of Research Guidelines.” https://tenk.fi/en/advice-and-materials/RCR-Guidelines-2012
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E. M., F. O. Anthun, S. Bailey, G. Birchley, H. Bout, C. Casonato, G. G. Fuster, B. Heinrichs, S. Horbach, I. S. Jacobsen, et al. 2018. “Working with Research Integrity—guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4): 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French National Research Agency. 2022. “Setting Up European or International Scientific Networks (MRSEI).” https://anr.fr/en/call-for-proposals-details/call/call-for-proposals-setting-up-european-or-international-scientific-networks-mrsei-edition-2022/
   Google Scholar
• Hammat, Z. H. 2017. “Accountability & Transparency for Research Integrity via Country Report Cards: USA.” Presentation at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity, Amsterdam, 28-31 May 2017. https://wcrif.org/images/2017/documents/3.%20Wednesday%20May%2031,%202017/1.%20Aula/Z.%20Hammatt%20%20Accountability%20and%20transparency%20for%20research%20integrity%20via%20country%20report%20cards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, R. C., K. Labib, I. Lechner, L. Bouter, G. Widdershoven, and N. Evans. 2022. “Guidance on Research Integrity Provided by European Discipline-Specific Learned Societies: A Scoping Review.” doi:10.1093/scipol/scac067.
   Google Scholar
• Hermerén, G., H. Zwart, A. Marušić, and D. Fanelli. 2019. “Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Research Integrity.” Final Report. https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/sites/default/files/rio/report/MLE%2520RI_Final%2520Report_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kleinert, S., and A. Marušić. 2016. “F2 Focus Track on Improving Research Systems: The Role of Countries. Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Research Integrity.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (Suppl 1): 55–56. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0012-9.
   Google Scholar
• Komić, D., S. L. Marušić, and A. Marušić. 2015. “Research Integrity and Research Ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of Terminology Used by Professional Organizations Across Research Disciplines.” Plos One 10 (7): e0133662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labib, K., N. Evans, R. Roje, P. Kavouras, A. Reyes Elizondo, W. Kaltenbrunner, I. Buljan, T. Ravn, G. Widdershoven, L. Bouter, et al. 2021. “Education and Training Policies for Research Integrity: Insights from a Focus Group Study.” Science & Public Policy scab077. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxembourg Agency for Research Integrity (LARI). 2022. “Research Training.” https://lari.lu/lari-services/researcher-training/
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, A. 2017. “Report Card: Croatia.” Presentation at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity, Amsterdam, 28-31 May 2017. https://wcrif.org/images/2017/documents/3.%20Wednesday%20May%2031,%202017/1.%20Aula/A.%20Marusic%20%20Accountability%20and%20transparency%20for%20research%20integrity%20via%20country%20report%20cards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, A. 2019. “Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Research Integrity: Processes and Structures - Thematic Report No 1.” https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/sites/default/files/rio/report/MLE%2520RI%2520-%2520Thematic%2520Report%25201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, A., I. Buljan, L. Barać, L. R. Tokalić, and M. Malički. 2018. “ENTIRE D.4.2, Protocol for Literature and Country Resources Search and Data Collection.” https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/741782/results
   Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, N., L. M. Bouter, G. Gaskell, P. Kavouras, N. Allum, A. K. Bendtsen, C. Charitidis, N. Claesen, K. Dierickx, A. Domaradzka, et al. 2020. “Research Integrity: Nine Ways to Move from Talk to Walk.” Nature 586 (7829): 358–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25116.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21896.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 2018. Australian Code of Conduct for Responsible Conduct of Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-responsible-conduct-research-2018
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT). 2016. “Guidelines for Research Ethics in Science and Technology.” https://www.forskningsetikk.no/globalassets/dokumenter/4-publikasjoner-som-pdf/60126_fek_guidelines_nent_digital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). 2021. “Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities.” https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/guidelines/social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/guidelines-for-research-ethics-in-the-social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and development (OECD) Global Science Forum. 2007. “Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct.” https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/40188303.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pizzolato, D., and K. Dierickx. 2021. “Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Research Integrity Training Practices: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roje, R., V. Tomić, I. Buljan, and A. Marušić. 2021. “Development and Implementation of Research Integrity Guidance Documents: Explorative Interviews with Research Integrity Experts.” Accountability in Research 1–38. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1989676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ščepanović, R., K. Labib, I. Buljan, J. Tijdink, and A. Marušić. 2021. “Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1): 4. doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science Europe. 2016. “Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organisations. Survey Report.” https://scienceeurope.org/our-resources/research-integrity-practices-in-science-europe-member-organisations/
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Statement on Research integrity. 2010. https://wcrif.org/guidance/singapore-statement
   Google Scholar
• Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). 2015. “National Statement on Scientific Integrity.” http://www.enrio.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/csic-national-statement-on-scientific-integrity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. 2006. “Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Decisions.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1): 53–74. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. 2017. “Good Research Practice.” https://www.vr.se/download/18.5639980c162791bbfe697882/1555334908942/Good-Research-Practice_VR_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wager, E. 2017. “Research Integrity Country Report Card: UK.” Presentation at the 5th World Conference on Research Integrity, Amsterdam, 28-31 May 2017. https://wcrif.org/images/2017/documents/3.%20Wednesday%20May%2031,%202017/1.%20Aula/E.%20Wager%20-%20Research%20integrity%20report%20card%20for%20the%20UK.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (WEF). 2018. “Code of Ethics.” https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Code_of_Ethics.pdf
   Google Scholar