Perceptions on the role of research integrity officers in French medical schools

References

• Adams, W. C. 2015. “Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews.” In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, edited by K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, and J. S. Wholey, 492–505. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781119171386.ch19.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson. 2007. “The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 437–461. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armond, A. C. V., B. Gordijn, J. Lewis, M. Hosseini, J. Kristóf Bodnár, S. Holm, and P. Kakuk. 2021. “A Scoping Review of the Literature Featuring Research Ethics and Research Integrity Cases.” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 50. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00620-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubert Bonn, N., and W. Pinxten. 2019. “A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At?” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 14 (4): 338–352. doi:10.1177/1556264619858534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubert Bonn, N., and W. Pinxten. 2021. “Rethinking Success, Integrity, and Culture in Research (Part 2) — a Multi-Actor Qualitative Study on Problems of Science.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 (1): 3. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonito, A. J., S. L. Titus, and D. E. Wright. 2012. “Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4): 605–619. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9274-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouter, L. M., J. Tijdink, N. Axelsen, B. C. Martinson, and G. Ter Riet. 2016. “Ranking Major and Minor Research Misbehaviors: Results from a Survey Among Participants of Four World Conferences on Research Integrity.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broad, W. J. 1981. “Congress Told Fraud Issue ‘Exaggerated.’.” Science 212 (4493): 421. doi:10.1126/science.212.4493.421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, K., E. Anne, and R. S. J. Chaya. 2015. “Perceptions That Influence the Maintenance of Scientific Integrity in Community-Based Participatory Research.” Health Education & Behavior 42 (3): 393–401. doi:10.1177/1090198114560016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drenth, P. J. D. 2010. “Research Integrity; Protecting Science, Society and Individuals.” European Review 18 (3): 417–426. doi:10.1017/S1062798710000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois, J. M., E. E. Anderson, J. Chibnall, K. Carroll, T. Gibb, C. Ogbuka, and T. Rubbelke. 2013. “Understanding Research Misconduct: A Comparative Analysis of 120 Cases of Professional Wrongdoing.” Accountability in Research 20 (5–6): 320–338. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.” In PLoS ONE, edited by T. Tregenza, Vol. 4. 5 e5738. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, A. 2019. “To Move Research from Quantity to Quality, Go Beyond Good Intentions.” Nature 566 (7744): 297. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00613-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., E. Namey, and M. Chen. 2020. “A Simple Method to Assess and Report Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Research.” In PLOS ONE, edited by A. Soundy, Vol. 15. 5 e0232076. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076.
   Google Scholar
• Khanyile, T., S. Duma, N. M. Lp Fakude, M. Daniels, F. Sabone, and M. S. Sabone. 2006. “Research Integrity and Misconduct: A Clarification of the Concepts.” Curationis 29 (1): 40–45. doi:10.4102/curationis.v29i1.1042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lejeune, C. 2019. Manuel d’analyse Qualitative : Analyser sans Compter Ni Classer [Qualitative Analysis Handbook: Analyzing Without Counting or Classifying]. Méthodes En Sciences Humaines. De Boeck Supérieur.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S. 1988. “Fraud in Medicine.” The BMJ 296 (6619): 376–377. doi:10.1136/bmj.296.6619.376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maisonneuve, H. 2019. “Development of Research Integrity in France is on the Rise: The Introduction of Research Integrity Officers Was a Progress.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1): 20. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0080-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (7043): 737–738. doi:10.1038/435737a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, N., L. M. Bouter, G. Gaskell, P. Kavouras, N. Allum, A.K. Bendtsen, C. A. Charitidis, N. Claesen, K. Dierickx, A. Domaradzka, et al. 2020. “Research Integrity: Nine Ways to Move from Talk to Walk.” Nature 586 (7829): 358–360. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., L. Bouter, S. Kleinert, P. Glasziou, M. Har Sham, V. Barbour, A.M. Coriat, N. Foeger, and U. Dirnagl. 2020. “The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity.” PLoS biology 18 (7): e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., L. D. Devenport, R. P. Brown, S. Connelly, S. T. Murphy, J. H. Hill, and A. L. Antes. 2006. “ARTICLES: Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures.” Ethics & Behavior 16 (4): 319–345. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1604_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paillé, P., and A. Mucchielli. 2021. L’analyse Qualitative En Sciences Humaines Et Sociales [Qualitative Analysis in Human and Social Sciences]. 5e ed. Paris: Collection U. Armand Colin. édition.
   Google Scholar
• Pupovac, V., and D. Fanelli. 2015. “Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-Analysis of Surveys.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5): 1331–1352. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., and A. E. Shamoo. 2011. “The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity.” Accountability in Research 18 (2): 71–75. doi:10.1080/08989621.2011.557296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roje, R., A. Reyes Elizondo, W. Kaltenbrunner, I. Buljan, and A. Marušić. 2022. June . “Factors Influencing the Promotion and Implementation of Research Integrity in Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Scoping Review”. Accountability in Research .1–39. 10.1080/08989621.2022.2073819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satalkar, P., and D. Shaw. 2018. “Is Failure to Raise Concerns About Misconduct a Breach of Integrity? Researchers’ Reflections on Reporting Misconduct.” Accountability in Research 25 (6): 311–339. doi:10.1080/08989621.2018.1493577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., and P. Satalkar. 2018. “Researchers’ Interpretations of Research Integrity: A Qualitative Study.” Accountability in Research 25 (2): 79–93. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1413940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. M. R., C. Rakestraw, and J. S. Farroni. 2022, February. “Research Integrity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Health Science Researchers at an Academic Health Science Center.” Accountability in Research 1–22. doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2029704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K. 2008. “Exploring Scientific Misconduct: Isolated Individuals, Impure Institutions, or an Inevitable Idiom of Modern Science?” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4): 271–282. doi:10.1007/s11673-008-9113-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. 2006. “Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1): 53–74. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., R. Verbeke, and Y. M. Smulders. 2014. “Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5): 64–71. doi:10.1177/1556264614552421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., P. Sainsbury, and J. Craig. 2007. “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19 (6): 349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twan, H., B. Greene, and D. H. Rohr. 2020. “Academic Research Integrity: Exploring Researchers’ Perceptions of Responsibilities and Enablers.” Accountability in Research 27 (3): 146–177. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1732824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. Q., A. F. Yan, and R. V. Katz. 2018. “Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians.” Annals of Internal Medicine 169 (8): 554. doi:10.7326/M18-1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. E., S. L. Titus, and J. B. Cornelison. 2008. “Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3): 323–336. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar