Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit

REFERENCES

• American Astronomical Society. (2010). AAS Ethics Statement http://aas.org/about/ethics_statement (Accessed: 17 March 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• American Chemical Society. (2006). Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research http://pubs.acs.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1218054468605/ethics.pdf (Accessed: 17 March 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Barrett , K. A. , Funk , C. L. and Macrina , F. L. 2005 . Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research . Accountability in Research , 12 : 193 – 206 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates , T. , Anie , A. , Marusic , M. and Marusic , A. 2004 . Authorship criteria and disclosure. Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms . Journal of the American Medical Association , 292 : 86 – 88 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouville , M. 2008 . Plagiarism: Words and ideas . Science and Engineering Ethics , 14 : 311 – 322 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Wright , D. A. , Dubick , D. A. and Newman , I. 1997 . Graduate assistant expectation and faculty perceptions: Implications for mentoring and training . Journal of College Student Development , 38 : 410 – 415 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton , L. D. 2005a . Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? . Mutation Research , 589 : 17 – 30 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton , L. D. 2005b . Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines . Mutation Research , 589 : 31 – 45 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , M. S. 2003 . The role of culture in research misconduct . Accountability in Research , 10 : 189 – 201 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fine , M. A. and Kurdek , L. A. 1993 . Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations . American Psychologist , 48 : 1141 – 1147 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin , A. , Carey , L. A. , Fontanarosa , P. B. , Philips , S. G. , Pace , B. P. , Lundberg , G. D. and Rennie , D. 1998 . Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals . Journal of the American Medical Association , 280 : 222 – 224 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk , C. L. , Barrett , K. A. and Macrina , F. L. 2007 . Authors and publication practices: Evaluation of the effect of responsible conduct of research instruction to postdoctoral trainees . Accountability in Research , 14 : 1 – 37 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1982). More on the ethics of scientific publication: Abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science. Current Contents, Number 30 (July 26): 5–10; also published in Garfield, E. (1981–82). Essays of an Information Scientist, 5: 621–626.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett , J. M. and Bird , S. J. 2000 . Ethical issues in communicating science . Science and Engineering Ethics , 6 : 435 – 442 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman , N. W. 1994 . Survey of fulfillment of criteria for authorship in published medical research . British Medical Journal , 309 : 1482
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2010). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Authorship and Contributorship http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html (Accessed: 17 March 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , C. 2005 . Questioning the importance of authorship . Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics , 28 : 149 – 150 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence , P. A. 2002 . Rank injustice . Nature , 415 : 835 – 836 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald , C. and Williams-Jones , B. 2009 . Supervisor-student relations: Examining the spectrum of conflicts of interest in bioscience laboratories . Accountability in Research , 16 : 106 – 126 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrina , F. L. 2000 . Scientific Integrity , Washington , D.C : ASM Press .
   Google Scholar
• Martinson , B. C. , Anderson , M. S. and de Vries , R. 2005 . Scientists behaving badly . Nature , 435 : 737 – 738 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton , R. K. 1973 . The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rennie , D. , Yank , V. and Emanuel , L. 1997 . When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable . Journal of the American Medical Association , 278 : 579 – 585 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik , D. B. 1997 . A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science . Science and Engineering Ethics , 3 : 237 – 244 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , D. L. , Burton-Danner , K. and Kiser , K. 1999 . Dealing with scientific disputes involving authorship . Professional Ethics , 7 : 45 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Seeman , J. I. and House , M. C. 2010 . (Credit and Authorship Practice. Educational and Environmental Influences) ,
   Google Scholar
• Seeman , J. I. and House , M. C. in press . Influences on authorship issues. An evaluation of receiving, not receiving, and rejecting credit . Accountability in Research ,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamoo , A. E. and Resnik , D. B. 2003 . Responsible Conduct of Research , New York : Oxford University Press . (See also the 2009 edition of this book.)
   Google Scholar
• Steneck , N. H. 2007 . Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research , Washington , D.C : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services .
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan , L. E. and Ogloff , J. R. 1998 . Appropriate supervisor-graduate student relationships . Ethics and Behavior , 8 : 229 – 248 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnow , E. , DeYoung , B. R. and Cohen , M. B. 2004 . Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survey-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline . Medscape General Medicine , 6 : 1 – 2 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vernon , B. , Rankin , J. , Stacy , R. , Perrson , P. , Thomas , L. , Kaner , E. , McColl , E. and Bhopal , R. 1997 . The process of researching authorship issues: A case study from the United Kingdom . The Council of Biological Editors (CBE) Views , 20 : 119 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Welsh , R. K. , Lareau , D. R. , Clevenger , J. K. and Reger , M. A. 2008 . Ethical and legal considerations regarding disputed authorship with the use of shared data . Accountability in Research , 15 : 105 – 131 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Federal policy on research misconduct. 76260-76264 http://ori.dhhs.gov/policies/fed_research_misconduct.shtml (Accessed: 17 March 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox , L. J. 1998 . Authorship. The coin of the realm, the source of complaints . Journal of the American Medical Association , 280 : 216 – 217 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward , J. and Goodstein , D. 1996 . Conduct, misconduct and the structure of science . American Scientist , 84 : 479 – 490 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar