Modelling achievement in advanced computer science: the role of learner characteristics and perceived learning environment

References

• Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131–150.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J., Fraser, B., Bell, L., & Dorman, J. (2012). Using a new learning environment questionnaire for reflection in teacher action research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 259–290.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 795–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankiewicz, P. (2018). Perceptions and attitudes of students towards technology: In search of a rigorous theoretical framework. International Journal of Technology Design and Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9434-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armoni, M., & Gal-Ezer, J. (2004). On the achievements of high school students studying computational models. Proceedings of the ninth Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(3), 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Astrachan, O., Cuny, J., Stephenson, C., & Wilson, C. (2011). The CS10K project: Mobilizing the community to transform high school computing. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, Dallas, TX, USA (pp. 85–86).
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Eva Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bergin, S., & Reilly, R. G. (2005). Programming: Factors that influence success. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 411–415.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 153–192.
   Google Scholar
• Birebaum, M., & Nasser, F. (2013). Self-efficacy appraisals and test-taking behavior of students from culturally diverse populations. ISRN Education Journal. Article ID, 839657.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, T. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133–153.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perception of computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self-esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environment Education, 18(1), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C., & Tsai, M. J. (2007). Gender differences in Taiwan high school students’ computer game playing. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 812–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes and students’ opposition. School misconduct as a reaction to teachers’ diminished effort and affect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 860–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010). Supporting student learning: A comparison of student discussion in museums and classrooms. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Dorman, J. P., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Psychosocial environment and affective outcomes in technology-rich classrooms: Testing a causal model. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 77–99.
   Google Scholar
• DuBow, W., & James-Hawkins, L. (2016). What influences female interest and persistence in computing? Preliminary findings from a multiyear study. Computing in Science & Engineering, 18, 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann, C., Tommaso, F., & Gianandrea, L. (2012). Educational achievement of second-generation immigrants: An international comparison. Economic Policy, 27(69), 143–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 35(3), 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelman, L., & Hazzan, O. (2008). Sectoral and gender-wise analysis of the choice of CS studies in Israeli high schools. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(4), 391-422.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. Oxford, GB: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal-Ezer, J., & Stephenson, C. (2014). A tale of two countries: Successes and challenges in K-12 computer science education in Israel and the United States. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(2), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galpin, V., Sanders, I., Turner, H., & Venter, B. (2003). Computer self-efficacy, gender, and educational background in South Africa. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 22(3), 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, B. (2005). Human resources and business performance: Findings, unanswered questions, and an alternative approach. Management Revue, 16, 174–185.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J., Estrella, R., & Margolis, J. (2006). Lost in translation: Gender and high school computer science. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Apray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 89–114). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadad, H. (2011). Survey and analysis of success predictive factors for computer science majors. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 3(9), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, D., & Markham, S. (2000). Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program?. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences beliefs on computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19(4), 443–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, E., & Weeden, E. (2003, October). The impact of prior experience in an information technology programming course sequence. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information Technology Curriculum-CITC4 (pp. 41–46), Lafayette, Indiana: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagacinski, C. M. (2013). Women engineering students: Competence perceptions and achievement goals in the freshman-engineering course. Sex Roles, 69, 644–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerkins, J. A., Stovall, J., Stenger, C. L., & Jenlins, J. T. (2013). Establishing the impact of a computer science/mathematics anti-symbiotic stereotype in CS students. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Klawe, M., & Leveson, N. (2001). Refreshing the nerds. Communications of the ACM, 44(7), 67–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuth, D. E. (1998). The art of computer programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental algorithms (3rd ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T., & Dontisa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 14(1), 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 16–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer-Yaron, H., & Kahanovitch, S. (2003). Women in science and technology in Israel – State of affairs. Jerusalem: The National Council for the Promotion of Women in Science and Technology. (Hebrew.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2014). Computer science: A new curriculum in reform. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/0E091CFA-8E73-4C24-96A7-0A6D23E571EA/189697/resource_849760831.pdf (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Nasser, F., & Birenbaum, M. (2005). Modelling mathematics achievement of Jewish and Arab eighth graders in Israel: The effects of learner-related variables. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. D., & Newton, D. L. (2011). Engaging science: Pre-service schoolteachers’ notions of engaging science lessons. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 327–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelsner, J., Lippold, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2011). Greenberg factors influencing the development of school bonding among middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 463–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, H. P. (2012). Relations between informational sources, self-efficacy and academic achievement: A developmental approach. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 81–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, N., & Jugoo, V. R. (2005). An investigation into student characteristics affecting novice-programming performance. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(4), 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. D. (2016). Correlates of success in introductory programming: A study with middle school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 441–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, T. (2016). CS in HS: Promoting computer science education in high school. S & T’S Peer to Peer, 1(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Saada, N. (2009). Socio-economic status, social support and self-regulated learning among Arabs in Israel. Retrieved from http://www.qsm.ac.il/mrakez/asdarat/jamiea/12/heb-5-nabeel%20soedah.pdf (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 80(2), 486–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., Jacobs, J., & Riggers, T. (2010, November). Women’s representation in science and technology (STEM) fields of study, 1976-2006. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE). Indianapolis, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, C., & Knobelsdorf, M. (2007). Attitudes towards Computer Science - computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to Computer science. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 27–38). New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seehorn, D., Pirmann, T., Batista, L., Ryder, D., Sedgwick, V., O’Grady-Cunniff, D., Twarek, B., Moix, D., Bell, J., Blankenship, L., Pollock, L., & Uche, C. (2016). CSTA K-12 Computer Science standards 2016 revised. New York: ACM Press. Retrieved from https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/Standards/2016StandardsRevision/INTERIM_StandardsFINAL_07222.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syzmanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta-analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 493–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, R. (2010). Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 301–316.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M., Davis, N., Bell, T., Katz, Y. J., Reynolds, N., Chambers, D. P., & Sysło, M. M. (2017). Computer science in K-12 school curricula of the 2lst century: Why, what and when? Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 445–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedenbeck, S., Labelle, D., & Kain, V. N. (2004, April). Factors affecting course outcomes in introductory programming. In 16th Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Carlow, Ireland (pp. 97–109).
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, C., & Lionelle, A. (2018). Quantifying the benefits of prior programming experience in an introductory computer science course. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. SIGCSE, 18 (pp. S.80–S.85). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. C. (2002). A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1), 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. C., & Shrock, S. (2001, February). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33( 1), 184-188. ACM.
   Google Scholar