Tabletop games designed to promote computational thinking

References

• Ames, M. G. (2018). Hackers, computers, and cooperation: A critical history of Logo and constructionist learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Apostolellis, P., Stewart, M., Frisina, C., & Kafura, D. (2014). RaBit EscAPE: A board game for computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610489
   Google Scholar
• Battistella, P., & Gresse, V. W. C. (2016). Games for teaching computing in higher education – a systematic review. IEEE Technology and Engineering Education, 9(1), 8–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., & Roberts, J. (2016). Computational thinking is more about humans than computers. I SET 2016-1  http://dx.doi.org/10.18296/set.0030.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, M., & Lee, V. R. (2011). Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 1(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U. (2019). Coding as another language: A pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beylefeld, D. A. A., & Struwig, M. C. (2007). A gaming approach to learning medical microbiology: Students’ experiences of flow. Medical Teacher, 29(9–10), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701601550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, A. A., & Engström, H. (2020). Patterns in mainstream programming games. Int. J. International Journal of Serious Games, 7(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v7i1.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1 (1), 1-8. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/»kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Castronova, E., & Knowles, I. (2015). Modding board games into serious games: The case of Climate Policy. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(3), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v2i3.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke-Midura, J., Silvis, D., Shumway, J., Lee, V. R., & Kozlowski, J. (2021). Developing a Kindergarten Computational Thinking Assessment Using Evidence-Centered Design: The Case of Algorithmic Thinking. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1877988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper-Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments. Finland: Tampere
   Google Scholar
• Elofsson, J., Gustafson, S., Samuelsson, J., & Träff, U. (2016). Playing number board games supports 5-year-old children’s early mathematical development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelstein, G. (2017). Gametek: The Math and Science of Gaming. USA: Ludology Pre.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., & Nix, S. E. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.695678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. (2017). Privilege, power, and dungeons & dragons: how systems shape racial and gender identities in tabletop role-playing games. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1293691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresse, V. W. C., de Medeiros, S., Filho, G., Petri, G., R., Pinheiro, D. C., Ferreira, F., & Hauck, J., N. (2019). SplashCode–A board game for learning an understanding of algorithms in middle school. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M., Kay, A., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2019). Computational thinking should just be good thinking. Commun. Communications of the ACM, 62(11), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habgood, M. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.508029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, M. S., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., & Olson, I. D. (2012). Spinners, dice, and pawns: Using board games to prepare for agent-based modeling activities. In American Educational Research Association annual meeting. Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/2012/AERA2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Batura, A., & Seah, T. L. (2020). The design and implementation of “unplugged” game-based learning in computing education. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ykq82
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, O., Arena, D., & Acholonu, U. (2011). Tug-of-war: A card game for pulling students to fractions fluency. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Games, Learning, & Society Conference (GLS '11), 119-127. ETC Press. Pittsburg, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., & Vasudevan, V. (2015). Hi-Lo tech games: Crafting, coding and collaboration of augmented board games by high school youth. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 130–139. Association for Computing Machinery. New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmpourtzis, G., & Romero, M. (2020). Constructive alignment of learning mechanics and game mechanics in Serious Game design in Higher Education. International Journal of Serious Games, 7(4), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v7i4.361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G., & Flanagan, M. (2016). High-low split: Divergent cognitive construal levels triggered by digital and non-digital platforms. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2773–2777. San Jose, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• King, C., & Cazessus, M. (2014). Teaching with Audacity: A board game for urban studies. 8th European conference on Games Based Learning: ECGBL2014, 272–280. Berlin, Germany: Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, W.-C., & Hsu, T.-C. (2020). Learning computational thinking without a computer: How computational participation happens in a computational thinking board game. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00479-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. R. (2020). Let’s cut to commercial: Where research, evaluation, and design of learning games should go next. Educational Technology Research and Development. 69, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09865-3
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. R., Poole, F., Clarke-Midura, J., Recker, M., & Rasmussen, M. (2020). Introducing Coding through Tabletop Board Games and Their Digital Instantiations across Elementary Classrooms and School Libraries. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 787–793. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366917
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. R., Rogowski, A., Shehzad, U., & Recker, M. (2021). Unplugged-to-plugged computer science at the library. Teacher Librarian, 48(3), 34–39. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/magazines/unplugged-plugged-computer-science-at-library/docview/2501270722/se-2?accountid=12598
   Google Scholar
• Lieberoth, A. (2015). Shallow gamification: Testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games and Culture, 10(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014559978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, T., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Ritchie, J. M., Aylett, R. S., Sta˘nescu, I. A. et al (2013). Strategies for effective digital games development and implementation. In Y. Baek & N. Whitton (Eds), Cases on digital game-based learning: methods, models, and strategies, IGI global (pp. 168–198). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2848-9.ch010
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-J., Lin, T.-C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, -C.-C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1550274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, C. K., How, M. L., Longkai, W., Seow, P., & Liu, L. (2018). Analysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinking. Computer Science Education, 28(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2011). Making gameplay matter: Designing modern educational tabletop games. Knowledge Quest, 40(1), 60. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/scholarly-journals/making-gameplay-matter-designing-modern/docview/1018482441/se-2?accountid=12598
   Google Scholar
• Ogershok, P. R., & Cottrell, S. (2004). The pediatric board game. Medical Teacher, 26(6), 514–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590410001711553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantic, K., Clarke-Midura, J., Poole, F., Roller, J., & Allan, V. (2018). Drawing a computer scientist: Stereotypical representations or lack of awareness? Computer Science Education, 28(3), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (1983). Logo Programming and Problem Solving [Technical Report No. 12.], American Educational Research Association Symposium. Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, F., Clarke-Midura, J., Sun, C., & Lam, K. (2019). Exploring the pedagogical affordances of a collaborative board game in a dual language immersion classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 753–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana, C., Quintana, R., & Bricker, L. (2020). The pragmatics of board games in K-12 science classrooms. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 3 (pp. 1809–1810). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, K., Rossiter, K., & Risdon, C. (2008). The Last Straw! A board game on the social determinants of health. Medical Education, 42(11), 1125–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03215.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, T. M. (2011). A board game to assist pharmacy students in learning metabolic pathways. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe759183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2009). Playing linear number board games—But not circular ones—Improves low-income preschoolers’ numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., Dorairaj, S. K., & Woods, P. (2007). Learning computer programming using a board game–case study on C-Jump. Proc. of the Int. Symposium on Information and Communications Technologies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Skillen, J., Berner, V.-D., & Seitz-Stein, K. (2018). The rule counts! Acquisition of mathematical competencies with a number board game. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1313187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, C., Harvey, B., Kahn, K., Lieberman, H., Miller, M., Minsky, M., Papert, A., & Silverman, B. (2020). History of Logo. Proc. ACM Program.4, HOPL, Article 79: June 2020 1–66 https://doi.org/10.1145/3386329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struwig, M. C., Beylefeld, A. A., & Joubert, G. (2014). Learning medical microbiology and infectious diseases by means of a board game: Can it work? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.774139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K.-Y., Chou, T.-L., & Tsai, -C.-C. (2020). A content analysis of computational thinking research: An international publication trends and research typology. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00442-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. K., Shyjka, A., Kumm, S., & Gjomemo, R. (2019). Educational design research for the development of a collectible card game for cybersecurity learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 3(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00027-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Training computational thinking through board games: The case of crabs & turtles. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v5i2.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagal, J. P., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282279
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., & Shute, V. J. (2019). Can playing a video game foster computational thinking skills? Computers & Education, 141, 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar