Publication Cover
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 25, 2014 - Issue 3
3,313
Views
67
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Does school-to-school collaboration promote school improvement? A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes

&
Pages 351-393 | Received 10 Nov 2011, Accepted 19 Mar 2013, Published online: 29 Oct 2013

References

  • Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2006). Improving urban schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Seashore Louis, K. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organisational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.
  • Bulkley, A., & Fisler, G. (2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Educational Policy, 17, 317–342.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: RAND McNally.
  • Chapman, C. (2008). Towards a framework for school to school collaboration in challenging circumstances. Educational Research, 50, 403–421.
  • Chapman, C., Ainscow, M., Bragg, J., Hull, J., Mongon, D., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2008). Emerging patterns of school leadership: Current trends and future directions. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
  • Chapman, C., & Gunter, H. (Eds.). (2009). Radical reforms: Perspectives on an era of educational change. London: Routledge.
  • Chapman, C., & Hadfield, M. (2010a). Realising the potential of school-based networks. Educational Research, 52, 309–323.
  • Chapman, C., & Hadfield, M. (2010b). Reconnecting the middle tier: Local authorities and school-based networks. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 221–247.
  • Chapman, C., Lindsay, G., Muijs, D., Harris, A., Arweck, E., & Goodall, J. (2010). Governance, leadership, and management in federations of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 53–74.
  • Chapman, C., & Salokangas, M. (2012). Independent state funded schools: Some reflections on recent developments. School Leadership & Management, 32, 473–486.
  • Clark, P. (1998). Back from the brink. London: Metro.
  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
  • Cullingford, C. (Ed.). (1999). An inspector calls: OfSTED and its effect on school standards. London: Kogan Page.
  • Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehen, H. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. London: Routledge.
  • Demos. (2001, January). Cracking good ideas: Understanding innovation in public policy. Paper arising from New Opportunities Fund sponsored seminars, London.
  • Department for Education and Skills. (2005). Education improvement partnerships: Prospectus. London: Author.
  • Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2007). Leadership in networked learning communities: Defining the terrain. School Leadership & Management, 27, 239–258.
  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1995). OfSTED, Schofsted. In T. Brighouse & B. Moon (Eds.), School Inspection (pp. 98–104). London: Pitman.
  • Guldemond, H., & Bosker, R. (2009). School effects on students’ progress: A dynamic perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 255–268.
  • Hadfield, M. (2005, April). Middle leaders and the nature of distributed leadership in networks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
  • Hadfield, M., & Chapman, C. (2009). Leading school based networks. London: Routledge.
  • Hampton, G., & Jones, J. (2000). Transforming Northicote School: The reality of school improvement. London: Routledge.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Hargreaves, D. (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham: National College.
  • Harris, A., Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Russ, J., & Stoll, L. (2006). Raising attainment in former coalfield areas. Sheffield: Department for Education and Skills.
  • Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London: Routledge.
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best, and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205–227.
  • Levin, B. (2009). Changing 5000 schools. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lieberman, A. (1999). Networks. Journal of Staff Development, 20, 43–44.
  • Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 221–227.
  • Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98, 1–44.
  • Lindsay, G., Muijs, D., Chapman, C., Harris, A., Arweck, E., & Goodall, J. (2007). Evaluation of the federations programme. Final Report. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
  • Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in an era of reform. New York, NY: National Centre for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching.
  • Melhuish, E., Romaniuk, H., Sammons, P., Sylva, K., & Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2006). Effective pre-school and primary education 3–11 (EPPE 3–11) tier 1: The effectiveness of primary schools in England in Key Stage 2 for 2002, 2003 and 2004 full report. London: EPPE.
  • Muijs, D. (2008). Collaboration in a rural school district. Improving Schools, 11, 61–73.
  • Muijs, D., Chapman, C., & Armstrong, P. (2010). An independent evaluation of Teach First. Manchester: University of Manchester.
  • Muijs, D., West, M., & Ainscow, M. (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking and collaboration between schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 5–26.
  • National College for School Leadership. (2001). Networked learning communities: Learning from each other, learning with each other. Nottingham: Author.
  • National Resource Centre. (2010). Mapping the landscape of charter management organisations: Issues to consider in supporting replication. San Diego, CA: Author.
  • Office for Standards in Education. (2000). Improving city schools. London: HMSO.
  • Office for Standards in Inspection. (1997). A better system of inspection? Hexham: Author.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: Author.
  • Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21, 147–161.
  • Sammons, P. (2008). Zero tolerance of failure and new labour approaches to school improvement in England. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 651–664.
  • Sammons, P., Mujtaba, T., Earl, L., & Gu, Q. (2007). Participation in network learning community programmes and standards of pupil achievement: Does it make a difference? School Leadership & Management, 27, 213–239.
  • Schagen, S., Davies, D., Rudd, P., & Schagen, I. (2002). The impact of specialist and faith schools on performance (LGA Research Report 28). Slough: NFER.
  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
  • Stoll, L., & Myers, K. (1998). No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulty. London: Routledge/Falmer.
  • Strand, S., & Demie, F. (2002). Pupil mobility, attainment and progress in primary school. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 551–568.
  • Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2010). Singlesex schooling and academic attainment at school and through the lifecourse. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 6–36.
  • Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2002). Collaborating across boundaries. London: Palgrave.
  • Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
  • Wohlstetter, P., Malloy, C. L., Chau, D., & Polhemus, J. L. (2003). Improving schools through networks: A new approach to urban school reform. Educational Policy, 19, 643–672.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.