State of the art – teacher effectiveness and professional learning

References

• Antoniou, P. (2009). Using the dynamic model of educational effectiveness to improve teaching practice: Building an evaluation model to test the impact of teacher professional development programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2011). The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, M., Rhodes, V., Brown, M., William, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency. London: King’s College London, School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M., & William, D. (1995). Recent research in mathematics education 5–16. London: Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning. Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borich, G. D. (1996). Effective teaching methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bosker, R., & Scheerens, J. (1994). Alternative models of school effectiveness put to the test. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In J. Bransford & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1992). Probing the subtleties of subject-matter teaching. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 4–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs. D., & Robinson, W. (2003). Differential teacher effectiveness: Towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 29, 347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432–463). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2002, July 9). Council resolution of 27 June 2002 on lifelong learning (2002/C 163/01). Official Journal of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2002:163:0001:0003:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 347–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, B. P. M., & Reezigt, G. J. (1996). School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 197–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76, 383–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
   Google Scholar
• Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 407–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., & Buettner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students, a meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on yeaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elboj, C., & Niemelä, R. (2010). Sub-communities of mutual learners in the classroom: The case of interactive groups. Revista de Psicodidαctica, 15, 177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evertson, C. M., Anderson, C. W., Anderson, L. M., & Brophy, J. E. (1980). Relationships between classroom behaviors and student outcomes in junior high mathematics and English classes. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evertson, C. M., & Emmer, E. T. (1982). Effective management at the beginning of the school year in junior high classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 485–498.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 3–29). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M. (1987). An ORACLE chronicle: A decade of classroom research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 299–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilberts, G. H., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (1997). Classroom management and instruction competencies for preparing elementary and special education teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 597–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2001). The backward approach. Journal of Staff Development, 22(3), 60.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. (2008). Incentives for efficiency and equity in the school system. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 9(Issue Supplement S1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Rouledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Google Scholar
• Haystead, M. W., & Marzano, R. J. (2009). Meta-analytic synthesis of studies conducted at Marzano Research Laboratory on instructional strategies. Englewood, CO: Marzano Research Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. A., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 76–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Tarter, J. C., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 260–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). Teacher expectations: II. Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuver, A. W. M., & Brandsma, H. P. (1993). Cognitive and affective outcomes in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 189–204.
   Google Scholar
• Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Autio, V. J. (2002). Evaluation of well-being in schools – a multilevel analysis of general subjective well-being. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Košir, K. (2005). The influence of teacher’s classroom management style on pupils’ self-regulative behavior. Studia Psychologica, 47, 119–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. (2008). Testing the validity of the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: A step towards the development of a dynamic model of effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 429–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Christoforou, Ch. (2011, April). A synthesis of studies searching for teacher factors: Implications for educational effectiveness theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B., Antoniou, P., & Demetriou, D. (2010). A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: Implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 807–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2009). The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: Two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education, 1, 61–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., & Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B., Antoniou, P., & Demetriou, D. (2010). A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: Implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 807–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., Muijs, D., Rekers-Mombarg, L., Papastylianou, D., Van Petegem, P., & Pearson, D. (2013). Using the dynamic model of educational effectiveness to design strategies and actions to face bullying. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.771686
   Google Scholar
• Leutwyler, B, & Maag Merki, K. (2009). School effects on students’ self-regulated learning: A multivariate analysis of the relationship between individual perceptions of school processes and cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational dimensions of self-regulated learning. Journal for Educational Research Online, 1, 197–223.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2008). Home environment and classroom climate: An investigation of their relation to students’ academic self-concept in a streamed setting. Current Psychology, 27, 242–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama, K., & Elliott, A. J. (2012). The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1035–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters. Somerset Wells: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D. (2011). Leadership and organisational performance: From research to prescription? International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D. (2012). Understanding how pupils learn: Theories of learning and intelligence. In V. Brooks, I. Abbott, & P. Huddleston (Eds.), Preparing to teach in secondary school (3rd ed., pp. 41–58). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., & Robinson, W. (2005). Making the case for differential teacher effectiveness: An overview of research in four key areas. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Creemers, C., Kyriakides, L., Van der Werf, G., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2011, January). State of the art – teacher effectiveness and professional learning. Keynote symposium presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Limassol, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement program (primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 273–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2003). Student background and teacher effects on achievement and attainment in mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 289–314.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2011). Effective teaching. Evidence and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, A. (2013). The effective mathematics department: Adding value and increasing participation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 165–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podesta, C. (2001). Self-esteem and the 6-second secret (Updated edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponitz, C. E. C., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instructions. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–287). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Barber, M., & Hillman, J. (1996). School effectiveness and school improvement in the United Kingdom. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 133–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. W. M. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 122–183). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. London: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens. J., & Creemers, B. P M. (1989). Conceptualizing school effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 13. 691–707.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4, 1–94.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student-achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin R. E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 647–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L., & Land, M. (1981). Low-inference verbal behaviors related to teacher clarity. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 17, 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E. (1999). Do schools differ?: Academic and personal development among pupils in the second-level sector. Dublin, Ireland: Oak Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallings, J. (1985). Effective elementary classroom practices. In M. J. Kyle (Ed.), Reaching for excellence: An effective sourcebook (pp. 14–42). Washington, DC: US Governing Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Fen, Y. (2006). The international system for teacher observation and feedback: Evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 561–582.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2008). Best evidence synthesis on professional learning and development (Report to the Ministry of Education). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: How the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 334–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12(1), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landeghem, G., Van Damme, J., Opdenakker, M.-C., De Fraine, B., & Onghena, P. (2002). The effect of schools and classes on noncognitive outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). The role of intellectual and metacognitive skills in math problem solving. In A. Desoete & M. V. J. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 35–50). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Kerseboom, L., & Imthorn, C. (2000). Test anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: Availability versus production deficiencies. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 13, 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, S. (1992). Effectieve instructie volgens het directe instructiemodel [Effective instruction using the direct instruction model]. Pedagogische Studien, 69, 242–269.
   Google Scholar
• Waeytens, K., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (2002). “Learning to learn”: Teachers’ conceptions of their supporting role. Learning and Instruction, 12, 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J. (1986). Syntheses of research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 214–229). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2005). A perspective on state-of-the-art research on self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33, 559–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar