Publication Cover
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 27, 2016 - Issue 2
2,160
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Exploring the link between experienced teachers’ learning outcomes and individual and professional learning community characteristics

&
Pages 205-227 | Received 12 Feb 2014, Accepted 05 Nov 2014, Published online: 13 Jul 2015

References

  • Andrews, D., & Lewis, M. (2002). The experiences of a professional community: Teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace. Educational Research, 44, 237–254. doi:10.1080/00131880210135340
  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  • Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20, 533–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 443–449.
  • Bolam, R., & McMahon, A. (2004). Literature, definitions and models: Towards a conceptual map. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 33–63). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
  • Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., … Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. London, UK: DfES and University of Bristol.
  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Bryk, A. S., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781. doi:10.1177/0013161X99355004
  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
  • Cranston, J. (2009). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Eight themes from research on principals’ perceptions of professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 90, 1–22.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., Alethea, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council and The School Redesign Network.
  • Datnow, A. (1998). The gender politics of educational change. London, UK: Falmer.
  • Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3–32). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
  • Deakin Crick, R. (2008). Pedagogy for citizenship. In F. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved: Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp. 31–55). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  • Department of Education. (2007). Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering betreffende het beroepsprofiel van de leraar [Resolution of the Flemish Government on teachers’ professional profile]. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  • Donaldson, M. L., Johnson, S. M., Kirkpatrick, C., Marinell, W., Steele, J., & Szczesiul, S. (2008). Angling for access, bartering for change: How second stage teachers experience differentiated roles in schools. Teachers College Record, 110, 1088–1114.
  • DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61, 6–11.
  • European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf
  • Frost, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 479–498. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122078
  • Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 406–427. doi:10.1086/593940
  • Gilles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organisations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 124–156. doi:10.1177/0013161X05278189
  • Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109, 877–896.
  • Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2006). Learning teaching from teachers: Realizing the potential of school-based teacher education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 329–351. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005
  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6, 151–182. doi:10.1080/713698714
  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 967–983. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.007
  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 23–46. doi:10.1080/0924345950060102
  • Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Huberman, M. (1989). On teachers’ careers: Once over lightly, with a broad brush. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 347–362. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90033-5
  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 291–317. doi:10.1080/09243450902909840
  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). London, UK: SAGE.
  • Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. D. Kruse, & Associates (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149–170. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00101-4
  • Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. H. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 226–234.
  • Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509–536.
  • Little, J. W. (2006). Professional development and professional community in the learning-centered school. Arlington, VA: National Education Association.
  • Lomos, C. (2012). Professional community and student achievement ( Doctoral thesis). Groningen, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  • Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement – A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 121–148. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.550467
  • Louis, K. S., Anderson, A. R., & Riedel, E. (2003, January). Implementing arts for academic achievement: The impact of mental models, professional community and interdiciplinary teaming. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 315–336. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486586
  • Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. D. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757–798. doi:10.3102/00028312033004757
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2007). Building professional learning communities in high schools: Challenges and promising practices. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 151–165). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 145–164. doi:10.1080/13540600601152496
  • Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  • Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership – Improvement through empowerment?: An overview of the literature. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 31, 437–449. doi:10.1177/0263211X030314007
  • Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the center on organization and restructuring of schools. Madison, WI: CORS.
  • Olivier, D. F., Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2008). Assessing and analyzing schools as PLCs. In K. K. Hipp & J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Purposeful actions, positive results. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments. First results from TALIS. Paris, France: Author.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris, France: Author.
  • Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 323–346. doi: 0013-5984/2010/11003-0004$10.00
  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
  • Retallick, J. (1999). Teachers’ workplace learning: Towards legitimation and accreditation. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 5, 33–50. doi:10.1080/1354060990050103
  • Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 116–126. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008
  • Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachersworkplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2004). Schools as learning organisations – Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 443–466. doi:10.1080/09243450512331383272
  • Smylie, M. A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. R. Guskey & M. H. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92–113). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Smylie, M. A. (1997). Research on teacher leadership: Assessing the state of the art. In B. J. Briddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 521–592). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced modeling. London, UK: Sage.
  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
  • Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
  • Struyve, C., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Organizational position and social-professional relationships in schools. An exploratory study of teacher leaders’ work life in Flanders. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant, & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion in school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching and learning (pp. 63–80). Bingly, UK: Emerald.
  • Struyve, C., Meredith, C., & Gielen, S. (2014). Who am I and where do I belong? The perception and evaluation of teacher leaders concerning teacher leadership practices and micropolitics in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 203–230. doi:10.1007/s10833-013-9226-5
  • Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2009). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56. doi:10.1177/1094670509353043
  • Tatel, E. S. (1994, April). Improving classroom practice: Ways experienced teachers change after supervising student teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
  • Vandenberghe, R., & Kelchtermans, G. (2002). Leraren die leren om professioneel te blijven leren: Kanttekeningen over context [Teachers learning to keep professionally learning: Reflections on context]. Pedagogische Studiën, 79, 339–351.
  • Van Veen, K., Zwart, R. C., Meirink, J. A., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: Een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren [Teachers’ professional development: A review study on effective charachteristics of professional development initiatives for teachers]. Leiden, The Netherlands: ICLON.
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  • Wahlstrom, K., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458–496. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321502
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255–316. doi:10.3102/00346543074003255
  • Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T., & Bolhuis, S. (2009). Which characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students? Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 243–257. doi:10.1177/0022487109336968

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.