Leading with intent: cultivating community conversation to create shared understanding

References

• Andrews, D. (2008). Working together to enhance school outcomes: An Australian case study of parallel leadership. Leading & Managing, 14(2), 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, R., Brack, C., & Samarwickrema, G. (2012). Teaching with wikis: Improving staff development through action research. Research in Learning Technology, 20(2). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ973814
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, R. (2011). How effective leaders reduce educational disparities. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 27–40). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chance, P. L. (2009). Introduction to educational leadership & organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
   Google Scholar
• City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, N., Mulford, B., Keating, J., & Reid, A. (2010). Primary school principals and the purposes of education in Australia: Results of a national survey. Journal of Educational Administration, 48, 517–539. doi:10.1108/09578231011054743
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2011). The layering of leadership. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 13–26). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, N. (2008). Leadership for learning: Some ethical connections. In J. Macbeath & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Leadership for learning: International perspectives (pp. 61–74). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmock, C. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duignan, P., & Cannon, H. (2011). The power of many: Building sustainable collective leadership in schools. Camberwell, VIC, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dulfer, N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. ( Producer). (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families (Research report). Retrieved from http://www.whitlam.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/409735/High_Stakes_Testing_An_Educators_Perspective.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (2009). Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In L. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (Vol. 1, pp. 1–12). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Retrieved from http://www.shankerinstitute.org/sites/shanker/files/building.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J., & Kleinhenz, E. (2007). Towards a moving school: Developing a professional learning and performance culture. Camberwell, VIC, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halbert, J., & Kaser, L. (2012). Inquiring learning environments: New mindsets required ( Seminar Series Paper No. 214). Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2010). Leadership for learning: What we have learned from 30 years of empirical research ( Seminar Series Paper No. 196). Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., & Rönnerman, K. (2011). The value and valuing of continuing professional development: Current dilemmas, future directions and the case for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 461–472. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2011.625004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2004). Teacher leadership and distributed leadership: An exploration of the literature. Leading & Managing, 10(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Day, C. (2002). Teacher leadership, reflective practice, and school improvement. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 957–977). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kayrooz, C., & Trevitt, C. (2005). Research in organisations and communities: Tales from the real world. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, interrelated strategies, and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43, 295–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, L. (2002a). Leading the conversations. In L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, M. E. Gardner, & M. Szabo (Eds.), The constructivist leader (2nd ed., pp. 63–88). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, L. (2002b). Toward a deepened theory of constructivist leadership. In L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P. Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, M. E. Gardner, & M. Szabo (Eds.), The constructivist leader (2nd ed., pp. 34–62). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2004). What we know about successful leadership. The Practising Administrator, 26(4), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2011). Leadership and student learning: What works and how. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 41–55). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28, 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 243–276. doi:10.1177/0013161x98034002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Mayrowetz, D., Smiley, M., & Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (Vol. 7, pp. 157–180). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeath, J. (2008). Leadership for learning: Exploring similarity and living with difference. In J. Macbeath & Y. Cheng (Eds.), Leadership for learning: International perspectives (pp. 1–12). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeath, J., & Swaffield, S. (2008, January). Leadership for learning: A matter of principle. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & De Nobile, J. (2013). Leadership for learning as an intentional, community-wide activity: The importance of developing a shared language in schools. School Leadership & Management, 33, 395–411. doi:10.1080/13632434.2013.813461
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., & Waters, T. (2009). District leadership that works: Striking the right balance. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (Vol. 7, pp. 81–100). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• May, H., Huff, J., & Goldring, E. (2012). A longitudinal study of principals’ activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2011). Revised models and conceptualisation of successful school principalship for improved student outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 61–82. doi:10.1108/09513541111100125
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, B., Silins, H., & Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penlington, C., Kington, A., & Day, C. (2008). Leadership in improving schools: A qualitative perspective. School Leadership & Management, 28, 65–82. doi:10.1080/13632430701800086
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. (2010). Accountability and the public purposes of education. Professional Voice, 8(1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2011). Partnership in leadership and learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 213–226). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why (ACEL Monograph Series, No. 41). Winmalee, NSW, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. (2009). Fit for purpose: An educationally relevant account of distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (Vol. 7, pp. 219–240). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161x08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandt, F.-O. (2012). Peer Observation Action Research Project. School Leadership & Management, 32, 355–373. doi:10.1080/13632434.2012.712511
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Smeed, J. L. (2010). Accountability through high-stakes testing and curriculum change. Leading & Managing, 16(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, G. (2011). Connecting leadership and learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 71–85). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, G. (2012, July). The changing role of educational assessment: From global to local impacts. Paper presented at the Independent Schools Queensland Think Tank.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2008). Critical friendship, dialogue and learning, in the context of Leadership for Learning. School Leadership & Management, 28, 323–336. doi:10.1080/13632430802292191
   Google Scholar
• Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. S. (2005). Instructional leadership challenges: The case of using student achievement information for instructional improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 3–22. doi:10.1080/15700760590924591
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. S. (2006). Learning challenges involved in developing leading for learning. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 34, 546–563. doi:10.1177/1741143206068217
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/media/files/ChildPovertyReport.pdf
   Google Scholar