Publication Cover
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 27, 2016 - Issue 4
6,487
Views
85
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teachers’ capacity for organizational learning: the effects of school culture and context

&
Pages 534-556 | Received 05 Mar 2015, Accepted 06 May 2016, Published online: 06 Jun 2016

References

  • Alavi, M., Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2005). An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 191–224.
  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 292–327.
  • Argyris, C. (1974). Alternative schools: A behavioral analysis. Teachers College Record, 75, 429–452.
  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437.
  • Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Barrett, L., Plotnikoff, R. C., Raine, K., & Anderson, D. (2005). Development of measures of organizational leadership for health promotion. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 195–207.
  • Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Beer, M. (1964). Organizational size and job satisfaction. Academy of Management journal, 7, 34–44.
  • Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 591–622.
  • Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M. (with Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M.). (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Research Report No. RR637). London, UK: Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/Creating%20and%20Sustaining%20PLCs_tcm4-631034.pdf
  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.
  • Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.
  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
  • Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (1992). Leading the self-managing school. London, UK: Falmer.
  • Camburn, E. M. (2010). Embedded teacher learning opportunities as a site for reflective practice: An exploratory study. American Journal of Education, 116, 463–489.
  • Cheng, Y. C. (1993). Profiles of organizational culture and effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 85–110.
  • Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 25–46). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.
  • Crossan, M. M., & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1087–1105.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policy makers need to know and be able to do. New York, NY: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. (1999). Recruiting teachers for the 21st century: The foundation for educational equity. The Journal of Negro Education, 68, 254–279.
  • De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2002). Accountability of schools and teachers: What should be taken into account? European Educational Research Journal, 1, 403-–428.
  • Demerath, P. (2009). Producing success: The culture of personal advancement in an American high school. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Downe, J., Hartley, J., & Rashman, L. (2004). Evaluating the extent of inter-organizational learning and change in local authorities through the English Beacon Council Scheme. Public Management Review, 6, 531–554.
  • Duke, D. L. (2006). Keys to sustaining successful school turnarounds. ERS Spectrum, 24(4), 21–35.
  • Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 783–796.
  • Enders, C. K. (2013). Centering predictors and contextual effects. In M. A. Scott, J. S. Simonoff, & B. D. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of multilevel modeling (pp. 89–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Erickson, F. (1987). Conceptions of school culture: An overview. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 11–24.
  • Farris, G. F., Senner, E. E., & Butterfield, D. A. (1973). Trust, culture, and organizational behavior. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 12, 144–157.
  • Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Mind the gap: Organizational learning and improvement in an underperforming urban system. American Journal of Education, 119, 41–71.
  • Firestone, W. A., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Schools as cultures. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 297–322). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fullan, M., Rincón-Gallardo, S., & Hargreaves, A. (2015). Professional capital as accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 15.
  • Gagnon, D. J., & Mattingly, M. J. (2015). Rates of beginning teachers: Examining one indicator of school quality in an equity context. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 226–235.
  • Goldhaber, D., Liddle, S., & Theobald, R. (2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 34, 29–44.
  • Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, & M. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 309–342.
  • Hall, R. H., Johnson, N. J., & Haas, J. E. (1967). Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 32, 903–912.
  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 1–27.
  • Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2007). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in school. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 159–194.
  • Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Robyn, A., Russell, J. L.,… Barney, H. (2007). Standards based accountability under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of teachers and administrators in three states. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. Retrieved from http://sparkaction.org/node/34024
  • Hausman, C. S., & Goldring, E. B. (2001). Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of professional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 30–51.
  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 659–689.
  • Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: IES Practice Guide (NCEE 2008-4020). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501241.pdf
  • Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.
  • Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators’ participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114, 627–664.
  • Hoy, W. K., Smith, P. A., & Sweetland, S. R. (2002–2003). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. The High School Journal, 86(2), 38–49.
  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 425–446.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88–115.
  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. N. B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Ingersoll, R. (2004). Why do high-poverty schools have difficulty staffing their classrooms with qualified teachers? Renewing our schools, securing our future. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/news/2004/11/19/1205/why-do-high-poverty-schools-have-difficulty-staffing-their-classrooms-with-qualified-teachers/
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Buckman, L. A., & Richards, P. S. (1985). The effect of prolonged implementation of cooperative learning on social support within the classroom. The Journal of Psychology, 119, 405–411.
  • Katz, S., & Earl, L. (2010). Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 27–51.
  • Knapp, M. S., Bamburg, J. D., Ferguson, M. C., & Hill, P. T. (1998). Converging reforms and the working lives of frontline professionals in schools. Educational Policy, 12, 397–418.
  • Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. D. Kruse, & Associates, Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Langer, J. A. (2000). Excellence in English in middle and high school: How teachers’ professional lives support student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 397–439.
  • Lee, M., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 664–698.
  • Lee, M., Louis, K. S., & Anderson, S. (2012). Local education authorities and student learning: The effects of policies and practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 133–158.
  • Lee, V. E., & Loeb, S. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 3–31.
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68, 241–270.
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907–945.
  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79, 464–490.
  • Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 243–276.
  • Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. American Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
  • Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 221–227.
  • Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917–946.
  • Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
  • Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. (2011, April). Validating the concept of professional community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Louis, K. S. (1998). Effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 1–27.
  • Louis, K. S. (2006). Organizational learning and high performance learning communities. In K. S. Louis (Ed.), Organizing for school change (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Louis, K. S. (2008). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 477–489.
  • Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Gordon, M. F. (2015). Political cultures in education: Emerging perspectives. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of educational politics and polcy (2nd ed., pp. 118–147). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Louis, K. S., & Gordon, M. F. (2006). Aligning student support with achievement goals: The secondary school principal’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., & Michlin, M. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of Research to the Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.pdf
  • Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–575.
  • Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.
  • Marks, H. M., Secada, W.G., & Doane, K (1996, April). Social support for achievement: Building intellectual culture in restructuring schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 97–108.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Meyer, H.-D. (2002). The new managerialism in education management: Corporatization or organizational learning? Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 534–551.
  • Michaelsen, L. K., Sweet, M., & Parmelee, D. X. (Eds.). (2011). Team-based learning: Small group learning’s next big step. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mintrop, H., & Trujillo, T. (2007). The practical relevance of accountability systems for school improvement: A descriptive analysis of California schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 319–352.
  • Mosenthal, J., Lipson, M., Torncello, S., Russ, B., & Mekkelsen, J. (2004). Contexts and practices of six schools successful in obtaining reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 343–367.
  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297–321.
  • O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690.
  • Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 323–346.
  • Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Sanders, M. G. (1998). The effects of school, family, and community support on the academic achievement of African American adolescents. Urban Education, 33, 385–409.
  • Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate behavioral research, 33, 545–571.
  • Schechter, C. (2008). Organizational learning mechanisms: The meaning, measure, and implications for school improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 155-–186.
  • Schechter, C., & Atarchi, L. (2014). The meaning and measure of organizational learning mechanisms in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 577–609.
  • Schechter, C., & Qadach, M. (2012). Toward an organizational model of change in elementary schools: The contribution of organizational learning mechanisms. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 116–153.
  • Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schildkamp, K., Lai, M. K., & Earl, L. (Eds.). (2013). Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shann, M. M. H. (1999). Academics and a culture of caring: The relationship between school achievement and prosocial and antisocial behaviors in four urban middle schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 390–413.
  • Shouse, R. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 47–68.
  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2004). Schools as learning organisations – Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 443–466.
  • Simon, H. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 125–134.
  • Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. R., & Hoy, W. K. (1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 294–308.
  • Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 496–536.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and material analysis. Journal of educational administration, 36, 334–352.
  • Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53, 894–907.
  • Tyre, M. J., & von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8, 71–83.
  • Van Houtte, M., & Van Maele, D. (2011). The black box revelation: In search of conceptual clarity regarding climate and culture in school effectiveness research. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 505–524.
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91.
  • Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458–495.
  • Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426–431.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1041–1059.
  • Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 239–259.
  • Wu, J. H., Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2013). Enabling school structure, collective responsibility, and a culture of academic optimism: Toward a robust model of school performance in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 176–193.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.