The impact of collaboration on teachers’ individual data use

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjusting model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blink, R. J. (2007). Data-driven instructional leadership. New York, NY: Eye On Education.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Levin, B. (2009). Using data to support educational improvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9063-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 378–398. doi:10.3102/0162373711412765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J. (2012). Data, dyads and dynamics: Exploring data use and social networks in educational improvement. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 7–28. doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy-Lewis, B. (2013). Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 341–362. doi:10.1108/09578231311311500
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Buttram, J. L. (2014). Developing collaborative data use through professional learning communities: Early lessons from Delaware. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 41–53. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Copperman, J., & Goodsman, D. (2009). Being interprofessional. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, L., Datnow, A., & Pruyn, L. (2014). Multiple initiatives, multiple challenges: The promise and pitfalls of implementing data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 54–62. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., Valcke, M., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2004, April). The use of performance indicators in a school improvement policy. What do experts say about it? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental models for “data use” among teachers and school leaders. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 5–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions: A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 2, 220–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. J., & Lasley, T. J., II. (2009). Part I: Theoretical and practical perspectives. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley, II (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education (pp. 3–86). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118, 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 315–336. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264196261-en
   Google Scholar
• Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Evaluatie in het Vlaamse onderwijs. Beleid en praktijk van leerling tot overheid [Evaluation in Flemish education. Policy and practice from student to government]. Antwerpen, Belgium: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., & Chick, H. (2011). Teachers’ intentions to use national literacy and numeracy assessment data: A pilot study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 433–447. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0040-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Ehren, M., & Lai, M. K. (2012). Editorial article for the special issue on data-based decision making around the world: From policy to practice to results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 123–131. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.652122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482–496. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Data teams for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27, 228–254. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Visscher, A., & Luyten, H. (2009). The effects of the use of a school self-evaluation instrument. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 69–88. doi:10.1080/09243450802605506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomenon. American Journal of Education, 118, 113–141. doi:10.1086/663283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2011(2), 53–55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., Vanlommel, K., Thijs, S., & Vanderlocht, H. (2014). Data use by Flemish school principals: Impact of attitude, self-efficacy and external expectations. Educational Studies, 40, 48–62. doi:10.1080/03055698.2013.830245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P., Verhoeven, J. C., & Buvens, I. (2009). Linking the policymaking capacities of schools and the quality of school self-evaluations. Education Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 667–686. doi:10.1177/1741143209339653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2016). Data use by teachers: The impact of motivation, decision-making style, supportive relationships and reflective capacity. Educational Studies, 42, 36–53. doi:10.1080/03055698.2016.1148582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, G., Vanhoof, J., Valcke, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Using school performance feedback: Perceptions of primary school principals. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 167–188. doi:10.1080/09243450903396005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, G., Vanhoof, J., Valcke, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Effecten van ondersteuning bij schoolfeedbackgebruik [Effects of support in school feedback use]. Pedagogische Studiën, 88, 90–106.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458–495. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., & Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Teacher needs for data-related professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Jimerson, J. B., & Cho, V. (2012). Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 159–178. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.652124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology. Active learning edition (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers’ use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112, 521–548. doi:10.1086/505058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar