School self-evaluation: self-perception or self-deception? The impact of motivation and socially desirable responding on self-evaluation results

References

• Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 37–47. doi:10.2307/2094445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, N. (1984). Data construction in social surveys. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Belson, W. A. (1981). The design and understanding of survey questions. Hampshire: Gower Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Levin, B. (2009). Using data to support educational improvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9063-x
   Google Scholar
• Cannell, C. F., Miller, P. V., & Oksenberg, L. (1981). Research on interviewing techniques. Sociological Methodology, 12, 389–437. doi:10.2307/270748
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (Eds.). (1995). Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Huber, S. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: International perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 359–367. doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.681508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11–24. doi:10.1177/1741143204039297
   Google Scholar
• Helmes, E., & Holden, R. R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: One or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 1015–1023. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00086-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, M., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2002). Using school effectiveness as a knowledge base for self-evaluation in Dutch schools: The ZEBO-project. In A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds.), School improvement through performance feedback (pp. 114–142). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161–172. doi:10.1177/0146167203259930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the data‐driven mantra: Different conceptions of data‐driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 105–131). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. doi:10.1111/jedm.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, R. C., Wittchen, H.-U., Abelson, J., & Zhao, S. (2000). Methodological issues in assessing psychiatric disorders with self-reports. In A. A. Stone, J. S. Turkkan, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 229–255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–314). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Labin, S. N. (2014). Developing common measures in evaluation capacity building: An iterative science and practice process. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 107–115. doi:10.1177/1098214013499965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. C. M., & Bengo, P. (2003). A comparison of three retrospective self-reporting methods of measuring change in instructional practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(1), 65–80. doi:10.1177/109821400302400106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for school self-evaluation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., & McGlynn, A. (2002). Self-evaluation: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., Schratz, M., Meuret, D., & Jakobsen, L. (2000). Self-evaluation in European schools: A story of change. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Matsunaga, M. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), 260–293. doi:10.1080/19312450802458935
   Google Scholar
• Meynen, K., Struyf, E., & Adriaensens, S. (2011). Is the beginning teacher ready for the job? The validation of an instrument to measure the basic skills of the beginning teacher in secondary education. Pedagogische Studien, 88(4), 266–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millham, J., & Kellogg, R. W. (1980). Need for social approval: Impression management or self-deception? Journal of Research in Personality, 14(4), 445–457. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(80)90003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131–149. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00490.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership – Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 31(4), 437–448. doi:10.1177/0263211X030314007
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas – A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–175. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598–609. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus deception scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding-7. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Barber, M., & Hillman, J. (1996). School effectiveness and school improvement in the United Kingdom. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(2), 133–158. doi:10.1080/0924345960070203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (1991). Process indicators of school functioning: A selection based on the research literature on school effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17(2–3), 371–403. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80091-4
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2008). Review and meta-analysis of school and teaching effectiveness. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forsching (BMBF).
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Glas, C. A. W., & Thomas, S. M. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring. A systemic approach. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Lai, M. K., & Earl, L. (Eds.). (2013). Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1975). The social desirability variable in organizational research: An alternative explanation for reported findings. The Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 741–752. doi:10.2307/255376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., ... Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. doi:10.1177/016235320302700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In I. B. Weiner, J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 607–634). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l’échelle de motivation en éducation (EME) [Construction and validation of the motivation scale in education]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21(3), 323–349. doi:10.1037/h0079855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., Deneire, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Waar zit beleidsvoerend vermogen in (ver)scholen? Aanknopingspunten voor zelfevaluatie en ontwikkeling [Where is policymaking capacity hidden in schools? Cruxes for self-evaluation and development]. Mechelen: Plantyn.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Evaluating the quality of self-evaluations: The (mis)match between internal and external meta-evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(1–2), 20–26. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoof, J., Van Petegem, P., Verhoeven, J. C., & Buvens, I. (2009). Linking the policymaking capacities of schools and the quality of school self-evaluations: The view of school leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 667–686. doi:10.1177/1741143209339653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petegem, P. (1998). Vormgeven aan schoolbeleid: Effectieve-scholenonderzoek als inspiratiebron voor de zelfevaluatie van scholen [Shaping school policy: School effectiveness research as a source of inspiration for school self-evaluation]. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Van Petegem, P., Devos, G., Mahieu, P., Dang Kim, T., & Warmoes, V. (2006). Hoe sterk is mijn school? Het beleidsvoerend vermogen van Vlaamse scholen [How strong is my school? The policy-conducting capacity of Flemish schools]. Mechelen: Wolters Plantyn.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 671–688. doi:10.1037/a0015083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232–260. doi:10.2307/256734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar