The impact of an assessment for learning teacher professional development program on students’ metacognition

References

• Allal, L. (2020). Assessment and the co-regulation of learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (1988). A general form of Rasch’s extended logistic model for partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0104_7
   Google Scholar
• Antoniou, P., Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2015). The Dynamic Integrated Approach to teacher professional development: Rationale and main characteristics. Teacher Development, 19(4), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1079550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baars, M., Wijnia, L., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2020). The relation between students’ effort and monitoring judgments during learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09569-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., Burton, R., van der Kleij, F., Ablaza, C., Carroll, A., Hattie, J., & Neill, S. (2021). Teachers activating learners: The effects of a student-centred feedback approach on writing achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103387
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Chan, K. K. H. (2017). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, C., Rasbash, J., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2020). MLwiN Version 3.05. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Christoforidou, M., Kyriakides, L., Antoniou, P., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2014). Searching for stages of teacher’s skills in assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, K., Hale, D., Grainger, C., & Stewart, M. E. (2020). Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: Systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research. Metacognition and Learning, 15(2), 155–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09222-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., & De Craene, B. (2019). Metacognition and mathematics education: An overview. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(4), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01060-w
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., O’Leary, M., & Yuan, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: “Breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo?”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J., Veugen, M., & Baartman, L. (2021). What are we really aiming for? Identifying concrete student behavior in co-regulatory formative assessment processes in the classroom. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 750281. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.750281
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitink, M. C., van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kippers, W. B., Wolterinck, C. H. D., Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ views on the use of assessment for learning and data-based decision making in classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Anthimou, M., & Panayiotou, A. (2020). Searching for the impact of teacher behavior on promoting students’ cognitive and metacognitive skills. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, Article 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., Roberts, M., Anthony, K. S., & Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/pdf/20133000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Magno, C. (2009). Developing and assessing self-regulated learning. The Assessment Handbook: Continuing Education Program, 1, 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilo, A., & Kramarski, B. (2019). Mathematical-metacognitive discourse: How can it be developed among teachers and their students? Empirical evidence from a videotaped lesson and two case studies. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(4), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01016-6
   Google Scholar
• Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Educational Practices Series No. 18). UNESCO International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/edu-practices_18_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook, Version 4.1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K–12 classrooms. Learning Sciences International.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2018). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 36–48). Routledge.
   Google Scholar