Principled Improvement in Science: Forces and proportional relations in early secondary-school teaching

References

• Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Boom, J., Hoijtink, H., & Kunnen, S. (2001). Rules in the balance: Classes, strategies, or rules for the balance scale task? Cognitive Development, 16, 717–735. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00056-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, A. L., & Frankhouser, J. R. (1988). Way stations in the development of children's proportionality concepts: The stage issue revisited. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 129–149. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2010). Key stage 2 to key stage 4 (KS2-KS4): Contextual value added measure (CVA) including English and maths. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/performance/archive/schools_10/s3.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. (2007). Gender and education: The evidence on pupils in England. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/00389-2007BKT-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (1999). Exemplary and promising mathematics programs. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. R. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20, 159–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duit, R. (2007). Bibliography STCSE (students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education). Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Education Scotland. (2011). Curriculum for excellence: Sciences (principles and practices). Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/sciences_principles_practice_tcm4-540396.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. (Ed.). (2006). Science education in schools: Issues, evidence and proposals. London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2012). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C. (2009a). Expert support for group-work in elementary science: The role of consensus. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 93–104). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C. (2009b). Collaborative group work in middle childhood: Joint construction, unresolved contradiction, and the growth of knowledge. Human Development, 52, 215–239. doi: 10.1159/000215072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., McWilliam, D., & Cross, G. (2005). Chance favours only the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 67–93. doi: 10.1348/000712604X15527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Intensive quantities: Why they matter to developmental research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 307–329. doi: 10.1348/026151009X410362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Bell, D., & Desli, D. (2010). Intensive quantities: Towards their recognition at primary school level. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series, 2(7), 101–118. doi: 10.1348/97818543370009X12583699332573
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Tavares Taylor, J., & Devine, A. (2012). Everyday conceptions of object fall: Explicit and tacit understanding in middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 351–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Taylor Tavares, J., & Devine, A. (2014). Children's understanding of physical events: Explicit and tacit understanding of horizontal motion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 141–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Thurston, A., Topping, K., Christie, D., Livingston, K., … Donaldson, C. (2007). Group work in elementary science: Organizational principles for classroom teaching. Learning and Instruction, 17, 549–563. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larrain, A. (2013). Argumentation in science learning in Chilean primary education: An efficacy study. Paper presented at the 15th biennial EARLI and JURE conference, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., Howe, C., & Freire, P. (in press). The effect of classroom oral argumentation on middle-school science learning. Manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2008). SPSS for intermediate statistics. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359–377. doi: 10.1080/01411920410001689689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20, 507–527. doi: 10.2167/le678.0
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., Grize, J.-B., Szeminska, A., & Bang, V. (1977). Epistemology and the psychology of functions. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). Origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Programme for International Student Assessment. (2009). PISA 2009 key findings. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa2009keyfindings.htm
   Google Scholar
• Programme for International Student Assessment. (2012). PISA 2012 results. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2007). Science: Programmes of study for key stage 3 and attainment targets. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematical skills. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. (2011). Preparing for the transfer from school and college science and mathematics education to UK STEM higher education: A ‘state of the nation’ report. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., Hofmann, R., Howe, C., Luthman, S., Mercer, N., & Taber, K. (2011). The epiSTEMe pedagogical approach: Essentials, rationales and challenges. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31, 131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Taber, K., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S., … Riga, F. (in press). A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary-school mathematics and science: The pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Pfaffman, J. (2005). How mathematics propels the development of physical knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 65–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0601_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Moore, J. L. (1998). On the role of mathematics in explaining the material world: Mental models for proportional reasoning. Cognitive Science, 22, 471–516. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2204_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCORE. (2011). National curriculum review—call for evidence. A SCORE response to the Department for Education's call for evidence on the review of the national curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/ScienceAndTechnology/Policy/EducationPolicy/SCORE-response-review-of-national-curriculum.asp
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Aguiar, O. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605–631. doi: 10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(2), 1–84. doi: 10.2307/1165995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (1995). TIMSS technical report (volume II): Implementation and analysis (primary and middle school years). Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/timss1995i/TechVol2.html
   Google Scholar
• Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (2011). TIMSS 2011 encyclopaedia: Education policy and curriculum in mathematics and science. Volumes 1 and 2. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/timss2011/encyclopedia-timss.html
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (2008). The conceptual change approach to the teaching of science. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 619–628). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar