Using a modified argument-driven inquiry to promote elementary school students’ engagement in learning science and argumentation

References

• Abrahams, I. (2009). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335–2353. doi: 10.1080/09500690802342836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. doi: 10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51–71. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effect of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 46, 399–424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1986). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Y., & Walmsley, R. P. (1997). Learning and understanding the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis-of-variance-by-ranks test for differences among three or more independent groups. Journal of Physical Therapy, 77, 1755–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M.-C., Hsieh, H.-Y., & Shyu, C.-Y. (2010). A cognitive component analysis for PISA science literacy. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 13(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-T, Wang, H.-H, Lin, H. S., Lawrenz, F., & Hong, Z. R. (2014). Longitudinal study of an inquiry-based science camp on low achieving children’s affective perceptions of learning science and positive thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2133–2156. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.910630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(30), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. Science Education, 33(6), 817–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551–570. doi: 10.1080/09500690701744595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. doi: 10.3102/00346543060004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Z. R., & Lin, H. S. (2011). An investigation of students personality traits and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 1001–1028. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.524949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Z. R., Lin, H. S., Wang, H.-H., Chen, H.-T., & Yang, K.- K. (2013). Promoting and scaffolding elementary school students attitudes toward science and argumentation through a science and society intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1625–1648. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.734935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. doi: 10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L. (2011). Using citizen science beyond teaching science content: A strategy for making science relevant to students’ lives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 501–508. doi: 10.1007/s11422-010-9304-4
   Google Scholar
• Jocz, J., Zhai, J., & Tan, A.-L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596–2618. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.908327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2008). Cooperation in the classroom (7th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman, N. (2014). Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Education and Science, 39(172), 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 871–893. doi: 10.1080/09500690600909091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (2001). Promoting good statistical practices: Some suggestions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 213–218. doi: 10.1177/00131640121971185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191–220. doi: 10.1002/sce.20245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-H., Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). A comparative study of Taiwan, Singapore, and China preservice teachers’ epistemic beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 599–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., Chen, C.-C., & Chou, C. H. (2011). The effect of integrating aesthetic understanding in reflective inquiry activities. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1199–1217. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.504788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Chen, Y. (2013). Exploring the development of college students situational interest in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2152–2173. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.818261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Lawrenz, F. (2012). Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 59(2), 378–384. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, M. R., & Skamp, K. R. (2013). The impact of teachers and their science teaching on students’ ‘science interest’: A four-year study. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2879–2904. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.667167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823. doi: 10.1002/tea.20430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Lin, T.-J., Jadallah, M., & Sun, J. (2014). The effects of reading to prepare for argumentative discussion on cognitive engagement and conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 33, 67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. doi: 10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347. doi: 10.1002/tea.21073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, A. D. (1996). Observing children in their natural worlds: A methodological primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., & Kuo, L. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation. Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449–472. doi: 10.1086/518623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn and learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643–670. doi: 10.1002/sce.21069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., & Walker, J. P. (2012) Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to learn by learning to write in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443–1485. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.667581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 235–260. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., & Johnson, S. (2008). Professional learning portfolios for argumentation in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 669–688. doi: 10.1080/09500690701854873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people's choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.590543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41, 19–38. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9144-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M., McConney, A., Maor, D., & Schibeci, R. (2013). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for indigenous and non-indigenous students in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Research in Science Education, 43, 233–252. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9265-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar