What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science

References

• Acher, A., & Arcà, M. (2010). Children’s representations in modeling scientific knowledge construction. In C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. P. Pérez Echeverría, & E. V. Teubal (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 109–131). Boston, MA: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adadan, E., Irving, K. E., & Trundle, K. C. (2009). Impacts of multi-representational instruction on high school students’ conceptual understandings of the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1743–1775. doi:10.1080/09500690802178628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 191–208). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–681. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097. doi:10.1126/science.1204153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amare, N., & Manning, A. (2007). The language of visuals: Text + graphics = visual rhetoric. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50, 57–70. doi:10.1109/TPC.2006.890851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ametller, J., & Pintó, R. (2002). Students' reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 285–312. doi:10.1080/09500690110078914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). The Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/download/f10
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, Y. M., & Davis, E. A. (2013). Middle-school science students' scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 213–238. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.624133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedward, J., Wiebe, E. N., Madden, L., Carter, M., & Minogue, J. (2009, April). Graphic literacy in elementary science education: Enhancing inquiry, engineering problem-solving and reasoning skills. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R., Dockrell, J., & Braisby, N. (2010). Children’s semantic representations of a science term. In C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. P. Pérez Echeverría, & E. V. Teubal (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 93–108). Boston, MA: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Botzer, G., & Reiner, M. (2007). Imagery in physics learning — from physicists’ practice to naïve students’ understanding. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 147–168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Britsch, S. (2013). Visual language and science understanding: A brief tutorial for teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35, 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children’s exploration of “big ideas”. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 319–341. doi:10-1080/09500690802595771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182–197. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, J., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2008). Using representations for teaching and learning in science. Teaching Science, 54, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38, 463–482. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinici, A. (2013). From caterpillar to butterfly: A window for looking into students' ideas about life cycle and life forms of insects. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 84–95. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.773361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. M., Bradley, L. G., & Donovan, C. A. (2012). Visual representations in second graders' information book compositions. The Reading Teacher, 66, 31–45. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. M., McTigue, E. M., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Elementary teachers' use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 612–643. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1
   Google Scholar
• Colin, P., Chauvet, F., & Viennot, L. (2002). Reading images in optics: Students' difficulties and teachers' views. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 313–332. doi:10.1080/09500690110078923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12. Retrieved from http://publications.cmec.ca/science/framework/
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Bergey, B. W., Fitzhugh, S., Newcombe, N., Wills, T. W., Shipley, T. F., & Tanaka, J. C. (2013). Effects of three diagram instruction methods on transfer of diagram comprehension skills: The critical role of inference while learning. Learning and Instruction, 26, 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Cognitive activities in complex science text and diagrams. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 59–74. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013). Science programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293–331. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. (2014). The construction of causal schemes: Learning mechanisms at the knowledge level. Cognitive Science, 38, 795–850. doi:10.1111/cogs.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlén, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children’s conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 41–57. doi:10.1080/09500690701630455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilam, B., & Poyas, Y. (2008). Learning with multiple representations: Extending multimedia learning beyond the lab. Learning and Instruction, 18, 368–378. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89, 335–347. doi:10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 491–520. doi:10.1080/09500690500339092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53, 587–597. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 117–133). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furberg, A., Kluge, A., & Lundvigsen, S. (2013). Student sensemaking with science diagrams in a computer-based setting. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 41–64. doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9165-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (1993). Models and modelling in science education. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Eds.), Visualization in science education (pp. 9–27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The role of visual representations in the learning and teaching of science: An introduction. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. (1968). The languages of art. Indianapolis, IL: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). Three aspects of children’s language development: Learning language, learning through language, and learning about language (1980). In J. Webster (Ed.), The language of early childhood (pp. 308–326). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1011–1026. doi:10.1080/095006900416884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harskamp, E. G., Mayer, R. E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction, 17, 465–477. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325–360. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2104_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsin, M. C., Chien, S. P., Hsu, Y. S., Lin, C. Y., & Yore, L. D. (2016). Development and validation of a Taiwanese communication progression in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 125–143. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9589-y
   Google Scholar
• Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5–28. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, 53, 5–18. doi:10.1080/00131910120033600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205–226. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualizations in Science Education (pp. 121–146). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon, P., & Keinonen, T. (2014). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-graders' representations of the greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 406–424. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.782452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39–48. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malter, M. (1947a). The ability of children to read a process-diagram. Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 290–298. doi:10.1037/h0053917
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malter, M. (1947b). The ability of children to read cross-sections. Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 157–166. doi:10.1037/h0058594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malter, M. (1948a). The ability of children to read conventionalized diagrammatic symbols. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, 27–34. doi: 10.1037/h0056189
   Google Scholar
• Malter, M. (1948b). Children’s ability to read diagrammatic materials. The Elementary School Journal, 49, 98–102. doi: 10.1086/459015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márquez, C., Izquierdo, M., & Espinet, M. (2006). Multimodal science teachers’ discourse in modeling the water cycle. Science Education, 90, 202–226. doi: 10.1002/sce.20100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M., Schraw, G., Lehman, S., & Poliquin, A. (2007). The effect of causal diagrams on text learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 367–388. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156–163. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2005). Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 35–45. doi: 10.1007/BF02504796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Buty, C. (2010). What does “in the infinite” mean? In C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. P. Pérez Echeverría, & E. V. Teubal (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 225–242). Boston, MA: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, D., Sharma, M., & Reimann, P. (2008). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92, 278–296. doi: 10.1002/sce.20244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). Literacy for science: Exploring the intersection of the next generation science standards and common core for ELA standards: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning & Instruction, 31, 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padalkar, S., & Ramadas, J. (2011). Using diagrams as an effective pedagogic tool in elementary astronomy. In S. Chunawala & M. Kharatmal (Eds.), Proceedings of epiSTEME-4 Conference, Mumbai, India (pp. 159–164). Retrieved from http://episteme4.hbcse.tifr.res.in/proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, C. C., & Varelas, M. (2009). Multimodal books in science-literacy units: Language and visual images for making meaning. Language Arts, 86, 201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Echeverría, M. P., Postigo, Y., & Pecharroman, A. (2010). Graphicacy: University students’ skills in translating information. In C. Andersen, N. Scheuer, M. P. Pérez-Echeverría, & E. V. Teubal (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 209–224). Boston, MA: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Pintó, R., & Ametller, J. (2002). Students’ difficulties in reading images. Comparing results from four national research groups. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 333–341. doi:10.1080/09500690110078932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2751–2773. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1843–1866. doi: 10.1080/09500690600718294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J., Boulter, C., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Seeing the natural world: A tension between pupils’ diverse conceptions as revealed by their visual representations and monolithic science lessons. Visual Communication, 6, 99–114. doi: 10.1177/1470357207071467
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C. (2002). The fundamental design variables of diagramming. In M. Anderson, B. Meyer, & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and reasoning (pp. 85–102). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Yore, L.D. (2009). Stitching the pieces together to reveal the generalized patterns: Systematic research reviews, secondary reanalyses, case-to-case comparisons, and metasyntheses of qualitative research studies. In M. C. Shelley, II., L. D. Yore, & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education (pp. 575–601). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 102–120. doi:1040-726X/02/0300-0101/0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. A., & Bermea, S. B. (2012). Using students' sketches to recognize alternative conceptions about plate tectonics persisting from prior instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60, 350–359. doi:1089-9995/2012/60(4)/350/10
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. doi:10.1002/sce.21099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2011). Exploring middle school students’ representational competence: Development and verification of a framework for learning with visual representations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uvic.ca
   Google Scholar
• Topsakal, U. U., & Oversby, J. (2013). What do scientist and non-scientist teachers notice about biology diagrams? Journal of Biological Education, 47, 21–28. doi:10.1080/00219266.2012.753102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F. (2007). General instructional methods and strategies. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 373–391). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo, J. (2000). Essay: Seeing science. Science Communication, 21, 379–391. doi: 10.1177/1075547000021004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Peterson, S., & Prain, V. (2006). Picturing evaporation: Learning science literacy through a particle representation. Teaching Science, 52, 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Peterson, S. (2007). Representational issues in students learning about evaporation. Research in Science Education, 37, 313–331. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006-9028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. (2004). Comparing school science explanations in books and computer-based formats: The role of images, image/text relations and hyperlinks. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31, 283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 129–140. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142–166. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285–325. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261–312. doi: 10.1023/A:1016064429161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, E., Demetriadis, S., & Ainsworth, S. (2009). Learning with external representations: Headed towards a digital culture. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning – Principles and products (pp. 137–153). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, E., & Lowe, R. (2010). Graphicacy: What Does the Learner Bring to a Graphic? Paper presented at the EARLI SIG 2: Comprehension of text and graphics. Tracing the mind: How do we learn from text and graphics?, Tübingen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2012). Learning from and through representations in science. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 145–155). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_12
   Google Scholar
• Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multi-modal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40, 65–80. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D. (2012). Science literacy for all - More than a slogan, logo, or rally flag! In K. C. D. Tan, M. Kim, & S. Hwang (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 5–23). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. doi: 10.1080/09500690305018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Florence, M. K., Pearson, T. W., & Weaver, A. J. (2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 109–141. doi:10.1080/09500690500336601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Florence, M. K. (2004). Scientists’ views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 338–369. doi: 10.1002/tea.20008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar