Inquiry and groups: student interactions in cooperative inquiry-based science

References

• Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ understanding of metallic bonding. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 401–420. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9054-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. (2009). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in the science teacher, 1998–2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 57–79. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (n.d.). Foundation to Year 10 curriculum: Science – implications for teacher, assessment and reporting. Retrieved August 26, 2015, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/implications-for-teaching-assessment-and-reporting
   Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., Lubben, F., Campbell, B., & Robinson, A. (2010). Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 69–95. doi:10.1080/09500690802713507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., & Erdogan, I. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891–1914. doi:10.1080/09500690701587028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. doi:10.2307/1170744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. D., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., & Nichols, K. (2015). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: Teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 171–191. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9418-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2014). Primary students’ scientific reasoning and discourse during cooperative inquiry-based science activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S., Barnes, J., & Cross, D. (2012). When does an opportunity become an opportunity? Unpacking classroom practice through the lens of ecological psychology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 249–267. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9367-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, B. S. (2013). Inquiry-based science: Turning teachable moments into learnable moments. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(1), 79–96. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9375-7
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. K., Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 717–724. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00036-1
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554–576. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1994). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, R., Warwick, P., Mercer, N., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2012). Primary children’s management of themselves and others in collaborative group work: ‘Sometimes it takes patience … ’. Education 3–13, 42(2), 201–216. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.670255
   Google Scholar
• Khosa, D. K., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: Can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding? Metacognition and Learning, 9(3), 287–307. doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 1(3), 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R., Baker, A., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Kim, I., … Wu, X. (2015). Less is more: Teachers’ influence during peer collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 609–629. doi:10.1037/a0037758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: A retrospective, cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963–980. doi:10.1002/sce.21135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. doi:10.1002/tea.20201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Pimentel, D. S., & Strauss, E. G. (2013). The impact of high school science teachers’ beliefs, curricular enactments and experience on student learning during an inquiry-based urban ecology curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2608–2644. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.618193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi:10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, W. J. Jr, Abell, S. K., Hubbard, P. D., McDonald, J., Otaala, J., & Martini, M. (2004). Dilemmas of teaching inquiry in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 257–279. doi:10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048330.07586.d6
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453. doi:10.1002/tea.20345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129–143. doi:10.2307/1170710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction – what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shymansky, J. A., Hedges, L. V., & Woodworth, G. (1990). A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curricula of the 60s on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 127–144. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660270205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2010). Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: Evidence from observations and self-reports. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(4), 473–492. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0026-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F. (2007). General instructional methods and strategies. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 373–391). Aarhus: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods-McConney, A., Wosnitza, M., & Donetta, K. (2011). Keep it positive: Using student goals and appraisals to inform small group work in science. Teaching Science, 57(3), 20–24.
   Google Scholar