Information literacy in science writing: how students find, identify, and use scientific literature

References

• Association of College and Research Libraries. (2006). Information literacy standards for science and technology. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/infolitscitech
   Google Scholar
• Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
   Google Scholar
• Aydelott, K. (2007). Using the ACRL information literacy competency standards for science and engineering/technology to develop a modular critical-thinking-based information literacy tutorial. Science & Technology Libraries, 27(4), 19–42. doi: 10.1300/J122v27n04_03
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 403–428. doi:10.1002/tea.20063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., Hömberg, J., & Torspecken, R. (2015). Is it believable when it’s scientific? How scientific discourse style influences laypeople’s resolution of conflicts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 36–57. doi:10.1002/tea.21172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. AJP: Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 70–79. doi:10.1152/advan.00138.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, M. B., & Chuppa-Cornell, K. (2015). Beyond embedded: Creating an online-learning community integrating information literacy and composition courses. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(4), 416–421. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. Cell Biology Education, 9(4), 524–535. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Vinent, I. J., & Carello, C. A. (2008). Embedded library instruction in a first-year biology laboratory course. Science & Technology Libraries, 28(4), 325–351. doi: 10.1080/01942620802202352
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Vinent, I. J., & Carello, C. A. (2011). The lasting value of an embedded, first-year, biology library instruction program. Science & Technology Libraries, 30(3), 254–266. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2011.592789
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. J. (2009). Promises and challenges for the use of adapted primary literature in science curricula: Commentary. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 385–390. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9115-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, M., & Rinaldo, V. (2012). Towards a mastery understanding of critical reading in biology: The use of highlighting by students to assess their value judgment of the importance of primary literature. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education : JMBE, 13(2), 142–149. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v13i2.493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonyo, C. P., & Cantwell, B. (2015). Faculty perceptions of students in life and physical science research labs. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 317–329. doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9315-2
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, W. H. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(3), 167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, L. L., Light, J., O’Malley, D., & Delwiche, F. A. (2010). Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: Implications for library services. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 98(1), 73–81. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, N., & Heisel, A. P. (2008). A faculty-librarian partnership for investigative learning in the introductory biology laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(4), 54–59..
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. (2013). Reading and Engaging Sources: What Students’ Use of Sources Reveals About Advanced Reading Skills. Across the Disciplines, 10(4). Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/jamieson.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, K., Galbraith, G. M., Herring, M., Stowers, E., Stewart, T., & Kingsley, K. V. (2011). Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. BMC Medical Education, 11, 17. Retrieved from http://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6920-11-17. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozeracki, C. A., Carey, M. F., Colicelli, J., & Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2006). An intensive primary-literature-based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral programs. Cell Biology Education, 5(4), 340–347. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0144
   Google Scholar
• Krontiris-Litowitz, J. (2013). Using primary literature to teach science literacy to introductory biology students. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 14(1), 66–77. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.538
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152–161. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Goldrick, N. B., Marzec, B., Scully, P. N., & Draper, S. M. (2013). Implementing a multidisciplinary program for developing learning, communication, and team-working skills in second-year undergraduate chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(3), 338–344. doi:10.1021/ed200643g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, I. A. M. (2014). Contexts of engagement: Towards developing a model for implementing and evaluating a writing across the curriculum programme in the sciences. Assessing Writing, 22, 18–32. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2014). Literacy for science: Exploring the intersection of the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 313–319. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9111-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J. A., Wolbach, K. C., Purzycki, C. B., Bowman, L. A., Agbada, E., & Mostrom, A. M. (2010). Integration of information and scientific literacy: Promoting literacy in undergraduates. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 536–542. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, P. A. (2010). The embedded science librarian: Partner in curriculum design and delivery. Journal of Library Administration, 50(4), 373–396. doi: 10.1080/01930821003667054
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J., Shah, A., & Pietrobon, R. (2009). Scientific writing of novice researchers: What difficulties and encouragements do they encounter? Academic Medicine, 84(4), 511–516. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8c3c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & Blankinship, L. A. (2015). Teaching information literacy skills to sophomore-level biology majors. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 29–33. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.818
   PubMedGoogle Scholar