The role of questions in the science classroom – how girls and boys respond to teachers’ questions^*

References

• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
   Google Scholar
• Blosser, P. E. (2000). How to ask the right questions. Arlington: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., & Anderson, N. C. (2003). Crossing the bridge to formal proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(8), 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2004). Questioning students in ways that encourage thinking. Teaching Science, 50(4), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. doi: 10.1080/09500690600621100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. doi: 10.1002/tea.20171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007005
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, P. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. doi: 10.1080/03057260208560187
   Google Scholar
• Einarsson, C. (2003). Lärares och elevers interaktion i klassrummet. Betydelsen av kön, ålder, ämne och klasstorlek samt lärares uppfattningar om interaktionen [Teachers and students interaction in the classroom. The importance of gender, age, subject and class size and teachers’ perceptions of the interaction]. Linköping: Filosofiska fakulteten, Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, N., Karlsson, K. G., & Sørensen, H. (2016). Teacher-student interaction in contemporary science classrooms: Is participation still a question of gender? International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1655–1672, doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1213457
   Google Scholar
• Friese, S. (2013). ATLAS.ti 7 user guide and reference. Berlin: Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, T. G. (1990). Språk och kön i skolan [Language and sex in school]. Tidskrift för genusvetenskap, 1, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the test … or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J., & Wheatly, J. (1990). Gender differences in teacher-student interactions in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(19), 861–874. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660270906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls’ and boys’ verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23, 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. L. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542–557). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D., & Yoles, W. C. (1976). The college classroom: Some observations on the meanings of student participations. Sociology and Social Research, 60(4), 421–439.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher-pupil interactions: Meta-analytic review. Manchester: University of Manchester, Department of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, T., & Baviskar, S. (2007). Moving students from information recitation to information understanding: Exploiting bloom’s taxonomy in creating science questions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26(5), 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller Andersen, H., & Lund Nielsen, B. (2013). Video-based analyses of motivation and interaction in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 906–928. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.627954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Great Britain: Ashford.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom. A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London: Institute of Physics.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, 2011. ISBN:978-91-86529-58-1. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576. doi:10.1080/095006999290570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström, E. (2009). Nordisk forskning om genus och jämställdhet i skola och utbildning: 2005-2009 [Nordic research on gender and equality in school and education] 20052009. Umeå: Umeå University
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume 1, Rev. edition, February). PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/978264208780-en
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2009). Vad påverkar resultaten i svensk grundskola? Kunskapsöversikt om betydelsen av olika faktorer [What affects the results in Swedish primary school? A systematic review of the importance of different factors]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2013). Interaction between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 249–267. doi:10.1007/S10972-012-9297-9
   Google Scholar
• Staberg, E. M. (1994). Gender and science in Swedish compulsory school. Gender & Education, 6(1), 35–46. doi: 10.1080/0954025940060103
   Google Scholar
• Tiberghien, A., & Sensevy, G. (2012). The nature of video studies in science education. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe. Retrospective and prospective (pp. 141–179). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. (1988). Differential engagement of males and females in high school science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 239–252. doi: 10.1080/0950069880100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. J. (1987). The role of target students in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 61–75. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660240107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernersson, I. (2006). Genusperspektiv på pedagogik [A gender perspective on pedagogy]. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices on the mind: A socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilen, W. W. (1991). What research says to the teacher: Question skills, for teachers (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic forum. (2015). Global gender Gap report 2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, D. Y. (2004). Question skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 76–83. doi:10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar