The role of feedback in young people’s academic choices

References

• Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASPIRES. (2013). Career aspirations of 10–14 year olds final project report. Targeted initiative for science and maths education. Retrieved May 21, 2016, from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/aspires-final-report-december-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students’ perceptions of the classroom environment. Educational Psychology, 22, 5–16. doi: 10.1080/01443410120101215
   Google Scholar
• CaSE, Campaign for Science and Engineering. (2014). Improving diversity in STEM. Retrieved May 19, 2016, from http://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/resource/ImprovingDiversityinSTEM2014.html
   Google Scholar
• Cimpian, A., Arce, H. C., Markman, E. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Subtle linguistic cues affect children’s motivation. Psychological Science, 18, 314–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01896.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, C., & Roger, A. (1999). Theorising progress: Women in science, engineering and technology in higher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 637–661. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098 2736(199908)36:6<637::AID-TEA4>3.3.CO;2-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Gender and education: The evidence on pupils in England. Retrieved May 20, 2016, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/00389-2007BKT-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., Davidson, W., Nelson, S., & Enna, B. (1978). Sex differences in learned helplessness II: The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 14, 268–276. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.14.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L. C. Wilkinson & C. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. (2009). She figures 2009 – Statistics and indicators on gender equity in science. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Roundtable of Industrialists. (2009). Mathematics, science & technology education report: The case for a European coordinating body. Accessed May 10, 2016, from http://www.ert.eu/sites/default/files/MST%20Report%20FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–59. doi:10.1007/BF01323661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1994). Classroom motivation from an attributional perspective. In H. O’Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 31–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1-to-3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84, 1526–1541. doi:10.1111/cdev.12064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). (Ed.). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., & Rose, C. S. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 399–407. doi:10.1017/S0140525X9800123X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaratne, T., Thomas, N., & Trautmann, M. (2003). Intervention programme to keep girls in the science pipeline: Outcome differences by ethnic status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 393–414. doi:10.1002/tea.10082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835–847. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.35.3.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher–pupil interactions: A meta-analytic review. Research in Education, 39, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1989). Attributional focus of praise and children’s intrinsic motivation: The moderating role of gender. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 61–72. doi: 10.1177/0146167289151006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, P. (2006). Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same-gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 36–46. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00260.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193. doi:10.1177/01461672022812004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, L. (2002). Women in physics: A review. The Physics Teacher, 40, 86–91. doi:10.1119/1.1457312
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Eccles, J. S., Kaczala, C., Goff, S. B., & Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 324–348. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved May 1, 2016, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/start.cfm
   Google Scholar
• NSB. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 10-01).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, A. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). Defensiveness vs. remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 599–612. doi:10.1177/0146167207312960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264229945-en
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Tytler, R. (2009). Attitudes towards science: An update. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California, April 13–17. Retrieved April 16, from http://science.teachingjournalclub.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Attitudes-Toward-Science-OsborneSimon-Tytler.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rhodewalt, F. (1994). Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality, 62, 67–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00795.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Skipper, Y., & Douglas, K. M. (2012). Is no praise good praise? Effects of positive feedback on children’s and university students’ responses to subsequent failures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 327–339. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept and professional goals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Institution of Engineering and Technology. (2015). Skills survey. Retrieved June 3, from http://www.theiet.org/factfiles/education/skills2015-page.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation: from mechanism to cognition. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 97, 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1037/h0029211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisgram, E. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2007). Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 262–269. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1036–1058. doi: 10.1002/tea.20195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215–246. doi: 10.3102/00028312037001215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar