References
- Akerson, V., Carter, I., & Elcan, N. (2016). On the nature of professional identity for nature of science: Characteristics of teachers who view themselves as teachers of nature of science, and their classroom practices. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 89–110). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427.
- Avraamidou, L. (2016). Studying science teacher identity: An introduction. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialized practices and knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965–986. doi: 10.1002/tea.20081
- Bang, E., & Luft, J. (2016). Practices and emerging identities of beginning science teachers in online and offline communities of practice. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 261–293). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. doi: 10.1080/03057640902902252
- Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
- Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779–802. doi: 10.1002/sce.20069
- Bullough, R. V. (1997). Practicing theory and theorizing practice. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 13–31). London: Falmer Press.
- Danielsson, A., & Warwick, P. (2014a). ‘All we did was things like forces and motion … ’: Multiple discourses in the development of primary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 693(May 2015), 1–26.
- Danielsson, A. T., & Warwick, P. (2014b). ‘You have to give them some science facts’: Primary student teachers’ early negotiations of teacher identities in the intersections of discourses about science teaching and about primary teaching. Research in Science Education, 44(2), 289–305. doi: 10.1007/s11165-013-9383-9
- Deneroff, V. (2016). Professional development in person: Identity and the construction of teaching within a high school science department. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 213–233. doi: 10.1007/s11422-013-9546-z
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
- Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. London: Polity Press.
- Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110. doi: 10.1002/tea.20040
- Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
- Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., Alvarez, H., & Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory Into Practice, 38, 87–93. doi: 10.1080/00405849909543837
- Guzey, S. S., & Aranda, M. (2017). Student participation in engineering practices and discourse: An exploratory case study. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 585–606. doi: 10.1002/jee.20176
- Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in science, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 207. doi: 10.1007/s10956-016-9673-x
- Guzey, S. S., Tank, K., Wang, H., Roehrig, G., & Moore, T. (2014). A high-quality professional development for teachers of grades 3-6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 139–149. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12061
- Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Kittleson, J. M., & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267–293. doi: 10.1002/tea.20003
- Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
- Lee, Y.-J. (2012). Identity-based research in science education. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 35–45). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Luehmann, A. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839. doi: 10.1002/sce.20209
- Luehmann, A. (2016). Practice-linked identitiy development in science teacher education: GET REAL! science as a figured world. In L. Avraamidou (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical, methodological and empirical explorations (pp. 15–48). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 349–371. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320405
- Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learner: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–278. doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
- Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, A. (2001). ‘Maestro, what is “quality”?’: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498. doi: 10.1002/tea.1014
- NRC (National Research Council). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Richmond, G., Juzwik, M. M., & Steele, M. D. (2011). Trajectories of teacher identity development across institutional contexts: Constructing a narrative approach. Teachers College Record, 113, 1863–1905.
- Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 732–755). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 3–24. doi: 10.1080/0950069022000070261
- Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., Kittleson, J., & Hutner, T. (2013). Understanding the induction of a science teacher: The interaction of identity and context. Research in Science Education, 43, 1221–1244. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9310-5
- Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. doi: 10.3102/0002831213476334
- Tracy, S. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121
- Varelas, M. (Ed.). (2012). Identity construction and science education research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Wallace, C. S. (2004). Framing new research in science literacy and language use: Authenticity, multiple discourses, and the ‘third space’. Science Education, 88(6), 901–914. doi: 10.1002/sce.20024
- Wendell, K., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540. doi: 10.1002/jee.20026
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.