1,204
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring the development of novice unqualified graduate teachers’ topic-specific PCK in teaching the particulate nature of matter in South Africa’s classrooms

&
Pages 742-770 | Received 28 Feb 2016, Accepted 10 Jan 2018, Published online: 26 Mar 2018

References

  • Allen, R., & Allnutt, J. (2013). Matched panel data estimates of the impact of Teach First on school and departmental performance. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qss/dqsswp/1311.html
  • Aydin, S., Friedrichsen, P. M., Boz, Y., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2014). Examination of the topic-specific nature of pedagogical content knowledge in teaching electrochemical cells and nuclear reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 658–674. doi: 10.1039/C4RP00105B
  • Bertram, A., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teachers’ views on CoRes and PaP-eRs as a framework for articulating and developing pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Science Education, 42, 1027–1047. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9227-4
  • Bertram, A., & Loughran, J. (2014). Planting the seed: Scaffolding the PCK development of pre-service science teachers. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking (pp. 117–131). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bindernagel, J. A., & Eilks, I. (2009). Evaluating roadmaps to portray and develop chemistry teachers’ PCK about curricular structures concerning sub-microscopic models. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(2), 77–85. doi: 10.1039/B908245J
  • Boz, N., & Boz, Y. (2008). A qualitative case study of prospective chemistry teachers’ knowledge about instructional strategies: Introducing particulate theory. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(2), 135–156. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9087-y
  • Carter, A. (2015). Carter review of initial teacher training (ITT).
  • Cresswell, J., & Clark, P. V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Daehler, K. R., Heller, J. I., & Wong, N. (2015). Supporting growth of pedagogical content knowledge in science. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 45–59). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Davidowitz, B., & Chittleborough, G. (2009). Linking the macroscopic and sub-microscopic levels: Diagrams. In GilbertJ.K., & TreagustD. (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 169–191). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651. doi: 10.3102/00346543076004607
  • De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. H. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 477–491. doi: 10.1007/s10763-004-4197-x
  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964. doi: 10.1002/tea.20078
  • Department of Basic Education. (2011a). Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS) Grades 10-12 Physical Sciences. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/CD/National%20Curriculum%20Statements%20and%20Vocational/CAPS%20FET%20%20PHYSICAL%20SCIENCE%20WEB.pdf?ver=2015-01-27-154258-683
  • Department of Basic Education. (2011b). Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS) natural sciences grades 7 8, 9. Retrieved March 3, 2018, from http://www.thutong.doe.gov.za/supportformatrics/NonLanguageCAPSSeniorPhase/tabid/5013/Default.aspx
  • Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77, 575–591. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730770603
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). Teacher professional knowledge bases … . In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225. doi: 10.1080/0263514022000030462
  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would It look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031005003
  • Hill, C. L., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualising and measuring teachers’ topic specific knowledge of students. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
  • Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes—A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341–355. doi: 10.1007/s11165-010-9168-3
  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi: 10.1080/03057260903142285
  • Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., Fischer, H. E., Gess-Newsome, J., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2016). Developing and evaluating a paper-and-pencil test to assess components of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1343–1372. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479
  • Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. doi: 10.1002/tea.20007
  • Luft, J. A. (2009). Beginning secondary science teachers in different induction programmes: The first year of teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2355–2384. doi: 10.1080/09500690802369367
  • Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In Handbook of research in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 889–909). New York: Routledge.
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. G. Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Mavhunga, E. (2012). Explicit inclusion of topic specific knowledge for teaching and the development of PCK in pre-service science teachers (PhD). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
  • Mavhunga, E. (2014). Improving PCK and CK in pre-service chemistry teachers. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, M. Askew, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking (pp. 31–48). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1-2), 113–125. doi:10.1080/10288457.2013.828406
  • Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8
  • Pitjeng, P. (2014a). Investigating the effect of an intervention on novice science teachers’ topic specific pedagogical content knowledge (PhD thesis), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
  • Pitjeng, P. (2014b). Novice unqualified graduate science teachers' topic specific pedagogical content knowledge and their beliefs about teaching. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, M. Askew, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking (pp. 65–83). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Rollnick, M. (2017). Learning about semi conductors for teaching—the role played by content knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 833–868. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9530-1
  • Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in PCK – A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 1365–1387. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187025
  • Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565. doi: 10.3102/0034654311423382
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Smith, P. S., & Banilower, E. R. (2015). Assessing PCK: A new application of the uncertainty principle. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 88–103). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 123–158.
  • Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions – Prevention, diagnosis and cure: Theoretical background (1st ed., vol. 1). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
  • Toerien, R. (2017). Mapping the learning trajectories of physical sciences teachers’ topic specific knowledge for teaching chemical bonding (PhD). University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
  • Treagust, D. F., Chandrasegaran, A., Crowley, J., Yung, B. H., Cheong, I. P.-A., & Othman, J. (2010). Evaluating students’ understanding of kinetic particle theory concepts relating to the states of matter, changes of state and diffusion: A cross-national study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 141–164. doi: 10.1007/s10763-009-9166-y
  • Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11431010
  • Van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. Lederman (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 848–870). London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 1.
  • Williams, J., Eames, C., Hume, A., & Lockley, J. (2012). Promoting pedagogical content knowledge development for early career secondary teachers in science and technology using content representations. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 327–343. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2012.740005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.