1,523
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Opening up’ a science task: an exploration of shifting embodied participation of a multilingual primary student

ORCID Icon &
Pages 771-795 | Received 15 May 2017, Accepted 28 Feb 2018, Published online: 13 Apr 2018

References

  • Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press Columbia University.
  • Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
  • Carspecken, P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Doris, E. (1991). Doing what scientist do: Children learn to investigate their world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Fleury, C. (2013). Les solidarités intergénérationnelles dans une perspective des parcours de vie [The intergenerational solidarities in a lifespan perspective]. Sociologie et sociétés, 45(1), 91. doi: 10.7202/1016397
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  • García, O. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name? TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00172.x
  • García, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. Equity Matters (Research Review No. 1). New York, NY: A Research Initiative of the Campaign for Educational Equity.
  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
  • Gómez Fernández, R. (2014). A case study of a Brazilian newcomer in a Luxembourgish school: Understanding the role of LPP in identity development. Sociolinguistic Studies, 8(2). doi:10.1558/sols.v8i2.293
  • Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457
  • Gurgel, I., Pietrocola, M., & Watanabe, G. (2016). The role of cultural identity as a learning factor in physics: A discussion through the role of science in Brazil. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 349–370. doi: 10.1007/s11422-014-9580-5
  • Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. doi: 10.1126/science.1204820
  • Harlen, W. (2012). Background resources for implementing inquiry in science and mathematics at school: Inquiry in science education. Retrieved from Montrouge, France: Fondation La main à la pâte.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg [STATEC]. (2016). Luxembourg in figures 2016.
  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture & Activity, 3(3), 149–164. doi: 1074-9039/96/149-164
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. D. (2016). Elementary teachers’ science knowledge and instructional practices: Impact of an intervention focused on English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 579–597. doi: 10.1002/tea.21314
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lock, R. (1990). Open-ended, problem solving investigation: What do we mean and how can we use them? School Science Review, 71(256), 63–72.
  • Martin, S. N., & Siry, C. (2012). Using video in science teacher education: An analysis of the utilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 24, pp. 417–433). the Netherlands: Springer.
  • Meyer, X. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2015). Multicultural inquiry toward demystifying scientific culture and learning science. Science Education, 99(4), 617–637. doi: 10.1002/sce.21162
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
  • Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de la Formation professionnelle et des Sports [Ministry of National Education, Vocational Training and Sports]. (2004). Ajout au plan d'études: L'évaluation à l'école primaire et objectifs principaux des différentes années d'études [Addition to the study plan: The evaluation at the primary school and main goals for the different study years]. Luxembourg.
  • Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse [Ministry of National Education, Childhood and Youth]. (2015). Statistiques globales et analyse des résultats scolaires: Enseignement fondamental: Cycles 1 à 4 – Éducation différenciée – Année scolaire 2013/2014 [Overall statistics and analysis of educational attainment: Primary education: Cycles 1 to 4 – special education –Year 2013/2014]. Luxembourg.
  • Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse [Ministry of National Education, Childhood and Youth]. (2016). Les chiffres clés de l’éducation nationale: Statistiques et indicateurs 2014/2015 [Key figures for national education: Statistics and indicators 2014/2015]. Luxembourg.
  • Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse [Ministry of National Education, Childhood and Youth], & Council of Europe. (2006). Profil de la politique linguistique éducative: Grand-Duché de Luxembourg [Language education policy profile: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg]. Strasbourg/Luxembourg.
  • Moore, E., Evnitskaya, N., & Ramos de Robles, S. (2016). Teaching and learning science in linguistically diverse classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11422-016-9783-z
  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Volume II). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/19963777
  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/19963777
  • Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307. doi: 10.1515/applirev-2015-0014
  • Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209–229.
  • Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (Vol. I). G. Jefferson & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.). Padstow: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Siry, Christina. (2013). Exploring the Complexities of Children’s Inquiries in Science: Knowledge Production Through Participatory Practices. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2407–2430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9364-z
  • Siry, C., Wilmes, S., & Haus, J. (2016). Examining children's agency within participatory structures in primary science investigations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 4–16.
  • Siry, C., Ziegler, G., & Max, C. (2012). ‘‘Doing science’’ through discourse-ininteraction: Young children’s science investigations at the early childhood level. Science Education, 96, 311–326.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  • Stromholt, S., & Bell, P. (2017). Designing for expansive science learning and identification across settings. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11422-017-9813-5
  • Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. doi: 10.1002/sce.21112
  • Tobin, K. (2013). A sociocultural approach to science education. Magis: Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 6(12), 19–35.
  • Valentova, M., & Berzosa, G. (2012). Attitudes toward immigrants in Luxembourg. Do contacts matter? Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 22(2), 341–363. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2012.696976
  • Vang, Christopher T. (2005). Minority students are far from academic success and still at-risk in public schools. Multicultural Education, 12(4), 9.
  • Varelas, M., Settlage, J., & Moore Mensah, F. (2015). Explorations of the structure-agency dialectic for framing equity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi: 10.1002/tea.21230
  • Weber, J. J. (2008). Safetalk revisited, or: Language and ideology in Luxembourgish educational policy. Language and Education, 22(2), 155–169. doi: 10.2167/le736.0
  • Wilmes, S. E. D., Siry, C., Gómez Fernández, R., & Gorges, A. (2018). Reconstructing science education within the language | science relationship: Reflections from multilingual contexts. In L. A. Bryan & K. Tobin (Eds.), 13 Questions. Reframing education's conversation: Science (Vol. 442, pp. 251–266). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Wortham, S. (1996). Mapping deictics: A technique for discovering teachers’ footing. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 331–348. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00100-6