The role of empathy for learning in complex Science|Environment|Health contexts

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Zeidler, D. L. (2015). New horizons for the journal of research in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 263–267. doi: 10.1002/tea.21216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749), 819–823. doi: 10.1126/science.1115455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stone, V., & Rutherford, M. (1999). A mathematician, a physicist and a computer scientist with asperger syndrome: Performance on folk psychology and folk physics tests. Neurocase, 5, 475–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2017). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065. doi: 10.1002/Sce.20462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2012). Scientific literacy in Environmental and Health Education. In A. Zeyer, & R. Kyburz-Graber (Eds.), Science|Environment|Health. Towards a renewed pedagogy for science education (pp. 49–67). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., & Gunstone, R. (2007). The Re-emergence of values in the science curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, N. (1979). Reflective equilibrium and theory of acceptance in ethics. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(5), 256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaul, M. R., & Ramsey, W. M. (1998). Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry. Studies in epistemology and cognitive theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• de Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. (2007). An organic intellectual? On science, education, and the environment. In K. Tobin, & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), The Culture of Science Education: Its History in Person (pp. 311–322). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. (2012). Science, environment and health education: Towards a reconceptualisation of their mutual interdependences. In A. Zeyer, & R. Kyburz-Graber (Eds.), Science|Environment|Health: Towards a renewed pedagogy for science education (pp. 87–101). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., & Reid, A. (2016). Science, the environment and citizenship: Teaching values at Minstead Study Centre. In The selected works of Justin Dillon (pp. 205–217). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dvash, J., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2014). Theory of mind and empathy as multidimensional constructs. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 282–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. (2012). Preparing citizens for a complex world: The grand challenge of teaching socio-scientific issues in science education. In A. Zeyer, & R. Kyburz-Graber (Eds.), Science|Environment|Health. Towards a renewed pedagogy for science education (pp. 7–29). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hafen, M. (2007). Mythologie der Gesundheit. Zur Integration von Salutogenese und Pathogenese [Mythology of health: Towards the integration of salutogenesis and pathogenesis]. Heidelberg: Carl Auer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. K. (2005). Science education and health education: Locating the connections. Studies in Science Education, 41(1), 51–90.
   Google Scholar
• Haste, H. (2004). Science in My future: A study of values and beliefs in relation to scienceand technology amongst 11–21 year olds. London: Nestlé Social Research Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Itzek-Greulich, H., & Vollmer, C. (2017). Emotional and motivational outcomes of lab work in the secondary intermediate track: The contribution of a science center outreach lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 3–28. doi: 10.1002/tea.21334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2016). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–29. doi: 10.1002/tea.21378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, D., & McKenna, K. (1990). Room to dream. New York: Canongate Books.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Durksen, T. L., Williamson, D., Kiss, J., & Ginns, P. (2016). The role of a museum-based science education program in promoting content knowledge and science motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1364–1384. doi: 10.1002/tea.21332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noddings, N., & Brooks, L. (2017). Teaching controversial issues: The case for critical thinking and moral commitment in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman, J. L., & Hope, J. M. G. (2014). Science news stories as boundary objects affecting engagement with science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 315–341. doi: 10.1002/tea.21144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE: Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (Relevance of Science Education) – a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education. Acta Didactica, 4, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Simpkins, S. D., Price, C. D., & Garcia, K. (2015). Parental support and high school students’ motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among latino and caucasian boys and girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1386–1407. doi: 10.1002/tea.21246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond Ecophobia. Great Barrington: The Orion Society.
   Google Scholar
• Stueber, K. (2017). Empathy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/empathy/
   Google Scholar
• Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2016, March). Testing the empathizing-systemizing theory in the general population: Occupations, vocational interests, grades, hobbies, friendship quality, social intelligence, and sex role identity. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 365–370. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., Ojala, S. J., & Lindeman, M. (2018). Male brain type women and female brain type men: Gender atypical cognitive profiles and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 122 (August 2017), 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2012). Measuring empathizing and systemizing with a large US sample. PLoS ONE, 7(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A. (2008). Students’ post-ecological Discourse in a Secondary One STSE (Science-Technology-Society-Environment) Education. Proceedings of the NARST 2008 Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A. (2012). What is a potential scientist? Motivation to learn science – a question of culture or of cognition? In S. Markic, I. Eilks, D. di Fuccia, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Issues of heterogenitiy and cultural diversity in science education and science education research (pp. 53–58). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A. (2017). Gender, complexity, and science for all: Systemizing and its impact on motivation to learn science for different science subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 147–171. doi: 10.1002/tea.21413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., Çetin-Dindar, A., Md Zain, A. N., Juriševič, M., Devetak, I., & Odermatt, F. (2013). Systemizing: A cross-cultural constant for motivation to learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1047–1067. doi: 10.1002/tea.21101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Dillon, J. (Eds.). (2014). Science|Environment|Health—Towards a reconceptualization of three critical and inter-linked areas of education. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9). Special Issue. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.904993
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Kelsey, E. (2013). Environmental Education in a Cultural Context. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education (pp. 206–212). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Kyburz-Graber, R. (Eds.). (2012). Science|Environment|Health. Towards a renewed pedagogy for science education. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3949-1
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., Levin, D. M., & Keselman, A. (2015). For the mutual benefit: Health information provision in a science classroom. In C. Arnott Smith & A. Keselman (Eds.), Meeting health information needs outside of healthcare (pp. 114–131). Oxford: Witney.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Odermatt , F. (2009). Gesundheitskompetenz (Health Literacy) - Bindeglied zwischen Gesundheitsbildung und naturwissenschaftlichem Unterricht. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15, 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Roth, W. M. (2013). Post-ecological discourse in the making. Public Understanding of Science, 22(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1177/0963662510394949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, S., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education. Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar