Key topics for quantum mechanics at secondary schools: a Delphi study into expert opinions

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. Paper presented at the ESERA, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educación Química, 16(3), 384–397.
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2009). A study of pre- and in-service physics teachers’ understanding of photoelectric phenomenon as part of the development of a research-based quantum physics course. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 658–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2014). Probing pre-and in-service physics teachers’ knowledge using the double-slit thought experiment. Science & Education, 23(9), 1811–1833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). Pisa 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Commissie Vernieuwing Natuurkundeonderwijs havo/vwo. (2010). Nieuwe natuurkunde, advies-examenprogramma’s voor havo en vwo [Contemporary physics, recommended exam programs for upper secondary school]. Amsterdam: Nederlandse Natuurkundige Vereniging.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction – A framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), The world of science education: Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 13–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, W., & Heusler, S. (2014). Visualization of the invisible: The qubit as key to quantum physics. The Physics Teacher, 52(8), 489–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalada, L. T., Rebello, N. S., & Zollman, D. A. (2004). Student explorations of quantum effects in LEDs and luminescent devices. The Physics Teacher, 42(3), 173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, E. K., Bungum, B., Angell, C., Tellefsen, C. W., Fragat, T., & Vetleseter Boe, M. (2014). Relativity, quantum physics and philosophy in the upper secondary curriculum: Challenges, opportunities and proposed approaches. Physics Education, 49(6), 678–684.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekzema, D., van den Berg, E., Schooten, G., & van Dijk, L. (2007). The particle/wave-in-a-box model in Dutch secondary schools. Physics Education, 42(4), 391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakostas, V., & Hadzidaki, P. (2005). Realism vs. Constructivism in contemporary physics: The impact of the debate on the understanding of quantum theory and its instructional process. Science & Education, 14(7), 607–629.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnle, A (2015). Research-based interactive simulations to support quantum mechanics learning and teaching. In C. Fazio & R.M. Sperandeo-Mineo (Eds.), Proceedings GIREP-MPTL conference 2014: Teaching/learning physics: Integrating research into practice (pp. 29–40). Palermo: Università degli Studi di Palermo.
   Google Scholar
• Kraska-Miller, M. (2013). Nonparametric statistics for social and behavioral sciences (pp. 191). Alabama: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 010109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laherto, A. (2010). An analysis of the educational significance of nanoscience and nanotechnology in scientific and technological literacy. Science Education International, 21(3), 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Lautesse, P., Vila Valls, A., Ferlin, F., Héraud, J. L., & Chabot, H. (2015). Teaching quantum physics in upper secondary school in France. Science & Education, 24(7–8), 937–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malgieri, M., Onorato, P., & De Ambrosis, A. (2017). Test on the effectiveness of the sum over paths approach in favoring the construction of an integrated knowledge of quantum physics in high school. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashhadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Insights into students’ understanding of quantum physics: Visualizing quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 20(6), 511–516.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C. (2001). Physics education research—The key to student learning [Oersted Medal lecture]. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Design and validation of the quantum mechanics conceptual survey. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020121.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, M., Ragazzon, R., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2000). Proposal for quantum physics in secondary school. Physics Education, 35(6), 406–410.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, M., Ragazzon, R., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2004). Discussion of a didactic proposal on quantum mechanics with secondary school students. Nuovo Cimento della Societa Italiana di Fisica C, 27(5), 555–567.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, M., Ragazzon, R., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2007). Learning paths of high school students in quantum mechanics. In R. Jurdana-Šepić, V. Labinac, M. Žuvić-Butorac, & A. Sušac (Eds.), Proceedings GIREP conference 2007: Frontiers of physics Education (pp. 337–343). Rijeka: Zlatni rez.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, M., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2015). Teaching modern physics in secondary school. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics, 14, 231.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, R., & Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 200–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy, A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogborn, J. (2006). A first introduction to quantum behavior. In E. van den Berg, A. L. Ellermeijer, & O. Slooten (Eds.), Proceedings GIREP conference 2006: Modelling in physics and physics education (pp. 230–236). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, R. V. (2002). Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F. (1994). Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 62, 796–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, G., & Jauch, L. R. (1978). Curriculum development through Delphi. Research in Higher Education, 8(2), 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Rossouw, A., Hacker, M., & de Vries, M. J. (2010). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education: An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential concepts of nanoscale science and technology for high school students based on a Delphi study by the expert community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1699–1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C., Belloni, M., & Christian, W. (2006). Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics. Physics Today, 59(8), 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: A descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttiprom, S., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Chitaree, R., & Soankwan, C. (2009). Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 631–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar