English-bilingual biology for standard classes development, implementation and evaluation of an English-bilingual teaching unit in standard German high school classes

References

• Abendroth-Timmer, D., & Wendt, M. (2000). Französisch/Spanisch als Arbeitssprache im Sachfachunterricht [French/Spanish as the working language in subject teaching]. In D. Abendroth-Timmer & S. Breidbach (Eds.), Handlungsorientierung und Mehrsprachigkeit: Fremd- und mehrsprachliches Handeln in interkulturellen Kontexten [Action orientation and multilingualism: Actions in foreign language and mutliple languages in intercultural contexts] (pp. 131–148). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 75–93. doi: 10.1080/13803610500392160
   Google Scholar
• Albedyll, A. v., Fritsch, A., & Dreesmann, D. (2017). I learned it through the grapevine … : Exploring atypical ecosystems in schools as a new out of school learning site. The American Biology Teacher, 79, 351–364. doi: 10.1525/abt.2017.79.5.351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6), 359–372. doi: 10.1037/h0043445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn, M. (2008). Didaktische, Methodische und Organisatorische Herausforderungen auf dem Weg zum bilingualen Biologieunterricht der Zukunft [Didactic, methodological and organisational challenges for future bilingual biology lessons]. In A. Scheersoi, & H.-P. Klein (Eds.), Bilingualer Biologieunterricht: Frankfurter Beiträge zur biologischen Bildung 6 [Bilingual biology lessons: Frankfurt Contributions to biology literacy] (pp. 25–47). Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, M. (2013). Biologie [Biology]. In W. Hallet, & F. G. Königs (Eds.), Handbuch Bilingualer Unterricht [Bilingual lessons] (pp. 286–295). Seelze: Kallmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, M., & Doff, S. (2010). Biologie bilingual: Die Perspektive der Unterrichtspraxis [Bilingual biology: Perspectives of applied teaching contexts]. In S. Doff (Ed.), Bilingualer Sachfachunterricht in der Sekundarstufe: Eine Einführung [Bilingual content teaching in secondary education: An introduction] (pp. 72–87). Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, A. (2012). Towards an evidence base for CLIL: How to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Breidbach, S., & Viebrock, B. (2012). CLIL in Germany – results from recent research in a contested field of education. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Charter, R. A. (1999). Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 559–566. doi: 10.1076/jcen.21.4.559.889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39, 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S026144480600320X
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (1999). Supporting students in content and language integrated contexts: Planning for effective classrooms. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning through a foreign language: Models, methods and outcomes (pp. 46–62). London: London Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandy, J., & Nettelbeck, T. (2002). The relationship between IQ, homework, aspirations and academic achievement for Chinese, Vietnamese and Anglo-Celtic Australian school children. Educational Psychology, 22(3). doi:10.1080/01443410220138502.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). Intrinsic motivation inventory. Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires/
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson Mayes, S., Calhoun, S. L., Bixler, E. O., & Zimmerman, D. N. (2009). IQ and neuropsychological predictors of academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 238–241. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehr, B. (2016). Doppelte Fachliteralität im bilingualen Unterricht. Theoretische Modelle für Forschung und Praxis [Dual literacy in bilingual instruction: Theoretical models for research and practice]. In B. Diehr, G. Preisfeld, & L. Schmelter (Eds.), Bilingualen Unterricht weiterentwickeln und erforschen [Development and research of bilingual instruction] (pp. 57–84). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What no child left behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 439–451. doi: 10.1037/a0026280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice European Unit. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
   Google Scholar
• Fast, L., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 729–740. doi: 10.1037/a0018863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, P. A., Kuhn, J.-T., & Holling, H. (2011). Measuring current achievement motivation with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F., & St. Père, F. (2001). When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement? Intelligence, 30, 71–100. doi:10.1016/s01602896(01)00068-x doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00068-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09336671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Mathelitsch, L., & Hopf, M. (2011). Fremdsprachiger Physikunterricht: Fremdsprachlicher Mehrwert auf Kosten fachlicher Leistungen? Auswirkungen fremdsprachenintegrierten Physikunterrichts auf fachliche Leistungen [Foreign language physics lessons: Added value for language skills at the cost of content achievement? Effects of content-language-integrated physics classes on content achievement]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 17, 223–260.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J., & Höfer, C. (1999). Evaluation in der Schule: Unterrichtsevaluationen [Evaluations in school: Evaluating lessons]. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.
   Google Scholar
• House, D. J. (2002). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29, 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Jerusalem, M., & Satow, L. (1999). Schulbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung [School-related self-efficacy]. In R. Schwarzer, & M. Jerusalem (Eds.), Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen [Scales for assessing teachers‘ and students‘ charactersitics] (pp. 15–16). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. E. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kissi, L., & Dreesmann, D. (2017). Plant visibility through mobile learning? Implementation and evaluation of an interactive flower hunt in a botanic garden. Journal of Biological Education. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2017.1385506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klieme, E. (ed.). (2008). Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch: Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie [Teaching and competence acquisition in German and English classes: Results of the DESI study]. Frankfurt: German Institute for International Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, A., & Bünder, W. (2006). Fachbezogener Wissenserwerb im Bilingualen Naturwissenschaftlichen Anfangsunterricht [Content-related knowledge achievement in bilingual science lessons]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 12, 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kondring, B., & Ewig, M. (2005). Aspekte der Leistungsmessung im bilingualen Biologieunterricht [Aspects of formal assessment in bilingual biology courses]. Berichte des Institutes für Didaktik der Biologie der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 14, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31–42. doi: 10.2174/1874913500801010030
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W., Lee, M.-J., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Nettelnstroth, W. (2012). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test – Screening: (IST-Screening). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31, 418–442. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattheoudakis, M., Alexiou, T., & Laskaridou, C. (2014). To CLIL or not to CLIL? The case of the 3rd experimental primary school in evosmos. In N. Lavidas, A. Thomai, & A. M. Sougari (Eds.), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics 3 selected papers from the 20th ISTAL (pp. 215–233). Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality-CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Puls, 33, 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of Lower Saxony. (2014). Materialien für kompetenzorientierten Unterricht im Sekundarbereich I: Bilingualer Unterricht [Materials for competence-oriented secondary education courses: Bilingual classes]. Hannover: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of North Rhine-Westphalia. (2011). Bilingualer Unterricht in Nordrhein-Westfalen [Bilingual courses in North Rhine-Westphalia]. Düsseldorf: Düssel-Druck & Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of Rhineland-Palatinate. (2011). Bilinguale Züge an Gymnasien: Verwaltungsvorschrift des Ministeriums für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Weiterbildung und Kultur vom 3. Juni 2011 [Bilingual tracks at the Gymnasium: Administrative regulation by the ministry of education, science, further education, and culture from June 3 2011]. Retrieved from http://landesrecht.rlp.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&psml=bsrlpprod.psml&feed=bsrlp-vv&docid=VVRP-VVRP000003411
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of Rhineland-Palatinate. (2014). Lehrpläne für die Naturwissenschaftlichen Fächer für die weiterführenden Schulen in Rheinland-Pfalz (Biologie Chemie Physik) Klassenstufen 7 bis 9/10 [Curricular science standards in secondary education in the state of Rhineland-Palatinate (biology, chemistry, physics) Grades 7 to 9/10]. Mainz: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. (2004). Of towers, walls, and fields: Perspectives on language in science. Science, 303(5662), 1333–1335. doi: 10.1126/science.1095204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–106. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J.-U. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised controlled field experiment with sixthgrade students on the effects of content and language integrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33 doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223-231. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., & Birnie, H. H. (1985). Secondary school students’ beliefs about the physics laboratory. Science Education, 69, 649–663. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730690507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen (Langversion, 2001) [QCM: A questionnaire to assess current motivation in learning situations]. Diagnostica, 47, 57–66. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, R., & Zimmermann, M. (2003). Und es geht doch: Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht auf Englisch [And it works: Science content courses in English]. In M. Wildhage, & E. Otten (Eds.), Praxis des bilingualen Unterrichts [Applied bilingual lessons] (pp. 116–146). Berlin: Cornelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenhauser, A., & Preisfeld, A. (2015). Bilingual (German-English) molecular biology courses in an out-of-school lab on a University Campus: Cognitive and affective evaluation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68 doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammet, R., Kutta, A.-M., & Dreesmann, D. (2015). Hands on or video-based learning with anticipation? A comparative approach to identifying student motivation and learning enjoyment during a lesson about ants. Journal of Biological Education. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2014.1002518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheersoi, A., & Klein, H. P. (2008). Bilingualer Biologieunterricht. Frankfurter Beiträge zur biologischen Bildung 6 [Bilingual biology lessons: Frankfurt Contributions to biology literacy]. Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R. (1996). Psychologie des Gesundheitsverhaltens. Einführung in die Gesundheitspsychologie [The psychology of healthy behavior: Introduction to health psychology]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit [The concept of self-efficacy]. In M. Jerusalem, & D. Hopf (Eds.), Selbstwirksamkeit und Motivationsprozesse in Bildungsinstitutionen [Self-efficacy and motivation processes in educational institutions] (pp. 28–53). Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany (KMK). (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss: Beschluss vom 16.02.2004 [Scholastic standards for biology for the intermediate secondary school diploma: Decree from 16.02.2004]. München: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany (KMK). (2013). Bericht, Konzepte für den bilingualen Unterrichtt: Erfahrungsbericht und Vorschläge zur Weiterentwicklung‘ Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 17.10.2013 [Report, Concepts for bilingual lessons: Reports and recommendations for further development. Decree of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany on October 17, 2013]. Retrieved from http://www.ecml.at/Portals/1/gazette/documents/22/2013-11-29-Konzepte-fuer-den-bilingualen-Unterricht_Endfassung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, H., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., Schröer, T., & Hoek, I. (1999). Unterrichtliche Aspekte im Fach Biologie, durch die Unterricht aus Schülersicht als interessanter erachtet wird [Aspects of biology education making biology classes more interesting from a students’ perspective]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 5, 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, M., Bätz, K., Kovaleva, A., & Urhahne, D. (2009). Überprüfung einer Kurzskala intrinsischer Motivation (KIM) [Validation of a short scale of intrinsic motivation]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15, 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Woods-Townsend, K., Christodoulou, A., Rietdijk, W., Byrne, J., Griffiths, J. B., & Grace, M. M. (2015). Meet the scientist: The value of short interactions between scientists and students. International Journal of Science Education Part B, 6(1), 89–113. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2015.1016134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862. doi: 10.3102/00028312031004845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676. doi: 10.3102/00028312029003663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar