4,016
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1701-1720 | Received 09 Dec 2018, Accepted 27 Jun 2019, Published online: 08 Jul 2019

References

  • Åkerlind, G. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321–334. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284672
  • Bartels, S., & Rupe, K. (2019). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of STEM before, during, and after the planning and delivery of a lesson. Paper presentation at the 2019 ASTE International Conference in Savannah, GA, January 4, 2019.
  • Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  • Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
  • Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 20(6), 5–9.
  • Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, T. J. Moore, & E. E. Peters-Burton (Eds.), STEM roadmap: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 23–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). A case for STEM education. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(4), 1–19.
  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8.
  • Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13–26. doi: 10.1080/14725860220137345
  • Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96–112. doi: 10.30707/JSTE48.1Herschbach
  • Hirsch, L. S., Carpinelli, J. D., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., & Bloom, J. (2007). The differential effects of pre-engineering curricula on middle school students’ attitudes to and knowledge of engineering careers. Published in the proceeding of 2007 Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 2–11.
  • Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated biology and undergraduate science education: A new biology education for the twenty-first century? CBE Life Science Education, 9, 10–16. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092
  • Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo elicitation. In E. Margolis, & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for science. Washington, D.C.: Authors.
  • National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies.
  • National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge.
  • Pink, S. (2006). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
  • Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759–774. doi: 10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5
  • Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444–467. doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1356671
  • Rinke, C. R., Gladstone-Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., & Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM teacher education: Affordances and constraints of explicit STEM preparation for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300–309. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12185
  • Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H.-H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
  • Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage Publications.
  • Sanders, M. E. (2009). STEM, STEMeducation, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 1, 20–26.
  • Shaughnessy, M. (2013). By way of introduction: Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324. doi: 10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.6.0324
  • Tanenbaum, C. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
  • Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L. J., & Malone, J. (1998). The integration of science, mathematics, and technology in a discipline-based culture. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 294–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17424.x
  • von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 25(2), 91–103.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.