How Chinese students’ scientific competencies are influenced by their attitudes?

References

• Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Eastwood, J. L. (2012). Bridging the gap between preservice early childhood teachers’ cultural values, perceptions of values held by scientists, and the relationships of these values to conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(2), 133–157. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9244-1
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1043–1047. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000052180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, S. S., Fatema, M. A. R., & Abdullah, H. (2012). A hands-on approach to teaching environmental awareness and pollutant remediation to undergraduate chemistry students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 173–184. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2012.698604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 800–814. doi: 10.1002/tea.20166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-López, Á., España-RAMOS, E., González-García, F. J., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2015). Key aspects of scientific competence for citizenship: A Delphi study of the expert community in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 164–198. doi: 10.1002/tea.21188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C., & Cheng, W. (2008). Science achievement and students’ self-confidence and interest in science: A Taiwanese representative sample study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1183–1200. doi: 10.1080/09500690701435384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, S., Wang, Z., Liu, X., & Zhu, L. (2017). Associations among attitudes, perceived difficulty of learning science, gender, parents’ occupation and students’ scientific competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge: The Riverside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469. doi: 10.1177/0963662506064240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. H., Dobbsoates, J., Doctoroff, G. L., & Arnold, D. H. (2012). Early math interest and the development of math skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 673–681. doi: 10.1037/a0027756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gungor, A., Eryılmaz, A., & Fakıoglu, T. (2007). The relationship of freshmen’s physics achievement and their related affective characteristics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1036–1056. doi: 10.1002/tea.20200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Hwang, M., Liu, M., Ho, H., & Chen, Y. (2014). Using a “prediction-observation-explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, E., & Randler, C. (2012). Living animals in the classroom: A meta-analysis on learning outcome and a treatment-control study focusing on knowledge and motivation. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 21(1), 95–105. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9285-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. (2013a). IBM SPSS Amos 22 [computer software]. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. (2013b). IBM SPSS Statistics 22 [computer software]. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, B. M., Lin, H., & Yore, L. D. (2014). The synergistic effect of affective factors on student learning outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 1084–1101. doi: 10.1002/tea.21153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Corin, E. N., Andre, T., Childers, G. M., & Stevens, V. (2016). Factors contributing to lifelong science learning: Amateur astronomers and birders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(3), 412–433. doi: 10.1002/tea.21371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Secondary school students’ understanding of science and their socioscientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 755–782. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9527-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpudewan, M., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Changes in primary students’ informal reasoning during an environment-related curriculum on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 16(3), 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10763-016-9787-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2000). Encyclopaedia of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F. S., BouJaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. I. (2017). Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299–334. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning & Instruction, 35(35), 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (fourth edition). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klopfer, L. E. (1976). A structure for the affective domain in relation to science education. Science Education, 60(3), 299–312. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730600304
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Kai, S. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448–470. doi: 10.2307/749801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laforgia, J. (1988). The affective domain related to science education and its evaluation. Science Education, 72(4), 407–421. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730720402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Chiu, H., & Chou, C. (2004). Student understanding of the nature of science and their problem-solving strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 101–112. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Lawrenz, F., Lin, S., & Hong, Z. (2013). Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 941–954. doi: 10.1177/0963662511429412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldviews and conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281–1307. doi: 10.1080/09500690601140019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupión-Cobos, T., López-Castilla, R., & Blanco-López, Á. (2017). What do science teachers think about developing scientific competences through context-based teaching? A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 937–963. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1310412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, C. T., Korfiatis, K., Evagorou, M., & Constantinou, C. (2009). Development of decision-making skills and environmental concern through computer-based, scaffolded learning activities. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 39–54. doi: 10.1080/13504620802567007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuutila, K., Tuominen, H., Tapola, A., Vainikainen, M. P., & Niemivirta, M. (2018). Consistency, longitudinal stability, and predictions of elementary school students’ task interest, success expectancy, and performance in mathematics. Learning & Instruction, 56, 73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003a). Definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003b). The PISA 2003 assessment framework – mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world – volume 1: analysis. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do – student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M., & Duit, R. (2010). Improving science and mathematics instruction: The SINUS project as an example for reform as teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 303–327. doi: 10.1080/09500690802535942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students’ experience of working with socioscientific issues – a quantitative study in secondary school. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147–1163. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9238-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1960). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Psycharis, S. (2013). Examining the effect of the computational models on learning performance, scientific reasoning, epistemic beliefs and argumentation: An implication for the STEM agenda. Computers & Education, 68, 253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahayu, S., Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., Kita, M., & Ibnu, S. (2011). Understanding acid-base concepts: Evaluating the efficacy of a senior high school student-centred instructional program in Indonesia. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1439–1458. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9272-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning & Instruction, 21(1), 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk, K. A. (2012). A socioscientific curriculum facilitating the development of distal and proximal NOS conceptualizations. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.546895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. doi: 10.1080/00220670209596607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. (2015). Improving students’ PISA scientific competencies through online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 321–339. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.987712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers & Education, 116, 14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C., Li, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2016). The relationships among adult affective factors, engagement in science, and scientific competencies. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 30–47. doi: 10.1177/0741713616673148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Byman, R., & Meisalo, V. (2011). Secondary school students’ interests, attitudes and values concerning school science related to environmental issues in Finland. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 167–186. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2010.522703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., … BouJaoude, S. (2015). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581–603. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, A., Bachman, B., Josway, S., Laemmerzahl, A. F., & North, B. (2014). Guiding student inquiry into eukaryotic organismal biology using the plasmodial slime mold physarum polycephalum. American Biology Teacher, 76(3), 196–200. doi: 10.1525/abt.2014.76.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371–400. doi: 10.1080/09500690903505661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Liu, S., Hsu, C., Chiou, G., Wu, H., Wu, Y., … Tsai, C. (2018). High-school students’ epistemic knowledge of science and its relation to learner factors in science learning. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 325–344. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9570-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar