699
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The meaning of ‘experiment’ in the intended chemistry curriculum in China: the changes over the period from 1952 to 2018

&
Pages 656-674 | Received 24 Sep 2019, Accepted 26 Jan 2020, Published online: 06 Feb 2020

References

  • Abrahams, I. (2011). Practical work in secondary science: A minds-on approach. London: Continuum.
  • Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1945–1969. doi: 10.1080/09500690701749305
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807–830). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Berg, L. B., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Chinese Communist Party (CCP). (1985). Reform of China’s educational structure - decision of the central committee of the Chinese Communist Party (official document) (in Chinese).
  • Curriculum and Teaching Materials Research Institute (CTMRI). (2001). The collection primary and secondary school curriculum standards and syllabi in the twentieth century in China: Chemistry volume. Beijing: People’s Education Press. (in Chinese).
  • Deng, Z. (2007). Knowing the subject matter of a secondary-school science subject. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(5), 503–535. doi: 10.1080/00220270701305362
  • Ding, B. (2015). Science education in Mainland China. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 882–889). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Donnelly, J. (1998). The place of the laboratory in secondary science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 585–596. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200506
  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualising the nature of science for science education. New York: Springer.
  • Fensham, J. P. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789–829). New York: Mavmillan.
  • Fensham, J. P. (2015). Curriculum movements in science education. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 275–279). New York: Springer.
  • Goodlad, J. (1979). Curriculum enquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Goodson, I. (1993). School subjects and curriculum change: Studies in curriculum history (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
  • Goodson, I. (2006). Socio-historical processes of curriculum change. In A. Benavot, & C. Braslavsky (Eds.), School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective (pp. 211–220). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Goodson, I. F., & Marsh, C. J. (1996). Studying school subjects: A guide (pp. 69–83). London: Falmer.
  • Gray, R. (2014). The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327–341. doi: 10.1002/sce.21098
  • Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). New York: Pergamon.
  • Guo, B., Liang, Y., & Xue, Y. (1993). A historical review on chemistry education in China. Nanchang: Jiangxi Jiaoyu Press. (in Chinese).
  • Hodson, D. (1988). Experiment in science and science teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(2), 53–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.1988.tb00144.x
  • Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135. doi: 10.1080/0022027980280201
  • Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
  • Hofstein, A. (2015). Forms of laboratory work. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 563–564). New York: Springer.
  • Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. Z. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In A. Hofstein, & I. Eilks (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A study book (pp. 153–182). Netherlands: SENSE.
  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. doi: 10.1177/1558689806298224
  • Liang, Y. (2002). Reflections on chemistry education. Beijing: People Education Press. (in Chinese).
  • Little, J. W. (1993). Professional community in comprehensive high schools: The two worlds of academic and vocational teachers. In J. W. Little, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 137–163). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Liu, X. (1996). Mathematics and science curriculum change in the People’s Republic of China. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.
  • Liu, X. (2017). Science education reform policies. In L. Liang, X. Liu, & G. W. Fulmer (Eds.), Chinese science education in the twenty-first century: Policy, practice, and research (pp. 1–4). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Mayo, D. G. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Millar, R. (1987). Towards a role for experiment in the science teaching laboratory. Studies in Science Education, 14, 109–118. doi: 10.1080/03057268708559941
  • Millar, R. (2015). Experiment. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 419–420). New York: Springer.
  • Ministry of Education (MoE). (2001). The chemistry curriculum standard of compulsory education of full-time schools. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (in Chinese).
  • Ministry of Education (MoE). (2003). The general senior secondary school chemistry curriculum standards. Beijing: People’s Education Press. (in Chinese).
  • Ministry of Education (MoE). (2011). The chemistry curriculum standards of compulsory education (the 2011 version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (in Chinese).
  • (Ministry of Education (MoE). (2018). The general senior secondary school chemistry curriculum standards (the 2017 version). Beijing: People’s Education Press. (in Chinese).
  • Moon, B., & Murphy, P. (1999). Perspectives on the context of curriculum. In B. Moon, & P. Murphy (Eds.), Curriculum in context (pp. 1–7). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Moore, R. (2000). For knowledge: Tradition, progressivism and progress in education-reconstructing the curriculum debate. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 17–36. doi: 10.1080/03057640050005753
  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: Misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96, 16–24.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Radder, H. (2009). The philosophy of scientific experimentation: A review. Automated Experimentation, 1(2), 1–8.
  • Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172–185. doi: 10.1039/B5RP90026C
  • Rogers, G. (2011). Learning-to-learn and learning-to-teach: The impact of disciplinary subject study on student-teachers’ professional identity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 249–268. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2010.521262
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Shulman, L. S., & Quinlan, K. M. (1996). The comparative psychology of school subjects. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 399–422). New York: Macmillan Pub.
  • Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory–a historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12(7), 645–670. doi: 10.1023/A:1025692409001
  • Wallace, J. (2015). Practical work. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (p. 763). New York: Springer.
  • Wang, Z., & Wang, L. (2012). Illustrations of the chemistry curriculum standards of compulsory education (the 2011 version). Beijing: Higher Education Press. (in Chines).
  • Wei, B. (2005). Science curriculum reform in post-compulsory education in the People’s Republic of China: The case of senior secondary school chemistry curriculum. Science Education International, 16, 291–303.
  • Wei, B. (2010). The changes in science curricula in China after 1976: A reflective review. In J. Lee (Ed.), Science education research in Asia (pp. 89–102). Boston: Sense Publishers.
  • Wei, B. (2012). Chemistry curriculum reform in China: Policy and practice. In H. Yin, & C. J. Lee (Eds.), Curriculum reform in China: Changes and challenges (pp. 95–109). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  • Wei, B. (2019). Reconstructing school chemistry curriculum in the era of core competencies: A case from China. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 1359–1366. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00211
  • Wei, B. (2020). The change in the intended Senior High School Chemistry Curriculum in China: Focus on intellectual demands. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21, 14–23. doi: 10.1039/C9RP00115H
  • Wei, B., & Chen, N. (2019). Agency in action: Two beginning science teachers’ stories in a context of curriculum reform in China. International Journal of Science Education, 41, 1287–1302. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1600205
  • Wei, B., & Thomas, G. P. (2005). Explanations for the transition of the junior secondary school chemistry curriculum in the People’s Republic of China during the period from 1978 to 2001. Science Education, 89, 451–469. doi: 10.1002/sce.20051
  • Wellington, J., & Ireson, G. (2012). Science learning, science teaching. New York: Routledge.
  • Wu, Y., Liu, Z., & Liang, Y. (1987). Illustrations of the chemistry syllabus of secondary schools. Chinese Journal of Chemistry Education, 2, 36–42. (in Chinese).
  • Yao, J. X., & Guo, Y. Y. (2018). Core competences and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1913–1933. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1514544

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.