References
- Addis, E., & Powell-Coffman, J. A. (2018). Student and faculty views on process of science skills at a large, research-intensive university. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(4), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_047_04_72
- Alberts, B. (2009). Redefining science education. Science, 323(5913), 437. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170933
- Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
- Bandyopadhyay, A. (2013). Measuring the disparities between biology undergraduates’ perceptions and their actual knowledge of scientific literature with clickers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.10.006
- Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.
- Brill, G., Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2004). The learning processes of two high-school biology students when reading primary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119465
- Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2012
- Burch, G. F., Burch, J. J., Heller, N. A., & Batchelor, J. H. (2015). An empirical investigation of the conception focused curriculum: The importance of introducing undergraduate business statistics students to the ‘real world’. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(3), 485–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12074
- Chen, P., Chavez, O., Ong, D. C., & Gunderson, B. (2017). Strategic resource use for learning: A self-administered intervention that guides self-reflection on effective resource use enhances academic performance. Psychological Science, 28(6), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617696456
- Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 524–535. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005
- Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- Fox, E. (2009). The role of reader characteristics in processing and learning from informational text. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 197–261. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308324654
- Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991). The structure-building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Language comprehension as structure building (pp. 289–311). Erlbaum.
- Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
- Haggis, T. (2003). Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000057401
- Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011). The C.R.E.A.T.E. approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates’ self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemological beliefs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 368–378. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
- Hubbard, K. E., & Dunbar, S. D. (2017). Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage. PLoS ONE, 12(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189753
- Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
- Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2004). First-year students’ perceptions of capability. Studies in Higher Education, 29(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1234567032000164903
- Magnus, J. R., & Peresetsky, A. A. (2018). Grade expectations: Rationality and overconfidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02346
- Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: I—outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II—outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
- Ramsden, P. (2003). Approaches to learning. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Learning to teach in higher education (pp. 39–61). Routledge.
- Serra, M. J., & DeMarree, K. G. (2016). Unskilled and unaware in the classroom: College students’ desired grades predict their biased grade predictions. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0624-9
- Sideridis, G. D. (2001). The causal role of goal importance for the explanation of student study behaviour: Cross-validation with multiple samples. Educational Psychology, 21(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120065487
- van Lacum, E., Ossevoort, M., Buikema, H., & Goedhart, M. (2012). First experiences with reading primary literature by undergraduate life science students. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1795–1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.582654
- van Lacum, E., Ossevoort, M., & Goedhart, M. (2014). A teaching strategy with a focus on argumentation to improve undergraduate students’ ability to read research articles. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 253–264. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-06-0110
- van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Academic Press.
- Vinke, C. M., Godijn, L. M., & van der Leij, W. J. R. (2014). Will a hiding box provide stress reduction for shelter cats? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 160, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.09.002
- Yarden, A. (2009). Reading scientific texts: Adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9124-2