References
- Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069940160407
- Aksela, M. (2010). Evidence-based teacher education: Becoming a lifelong research-oriented chemistry teacher? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005350N
- Albanesi, A., & Vicenti, M. (1997). Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle model. Science and Education, 6(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017933500475
- Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in primary science. McGraw-Hill.
- Ayas, A., Özmen, H., & Calik, M. (2010). Students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9167-x
- Aydeniz, M., Bilican, K., & Kirbulut, Z. D. (2017). Exploring pre-service elementary science teachers’ conceptual understanding of particulate nature of matter through three-tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(3), 221–221. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.296036
- Aydeniz, M., & Kotowski, E. L. (2012). What do middle and high school students know about the particulate nature of matter after instruction? Implications for practice. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00120.x
- Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). Macmillan.
- Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280409
- Barnea, N., & Dori, J. Y. (1999). High school chemistry students’ performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modelling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009436509753
- Benze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199905)36:5<521::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-6
- Bergqvist, A., Drechsler, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2016). Upper secondary teachers’ knowledge for teaching chemical bonding models. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1125034
- Boo, H. K., & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in high school students’ (aged 16–18) conceptualizations about chemical reactions in solution. Science Education, 85(5), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1024
- Bunce, D. M., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particular nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10056
- Chang, J. Y. (1999). Teachers college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83(5), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<511::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
- Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Costu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in first year students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/C001041N
- Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
- diSessa, A. A. (2008). A birds-eye view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35–60). Routledge.
- Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science – research into children’s ideas. Routledge.
- Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press.
- Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10054
- European Comission: Education, Resources and Tools. https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/european-credit-transfer-and-accumulation-system-ects_en
- Falvo, D. A., & Suits, J. P. (2009). Gender and spatial ability in the use of specific labels and diagrammatic arrows in micro-level chemistry animation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.1.d
- Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Helsinki.
- Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
- Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y
- Gooding, J., & Metz, B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change. The Science Teacher, 34–37.
- Goodwin, A. (2003). Evaporation and boiling – trainee science teachers’ understanding. School Science Review, 84(309), 131–141.
- Hadenfeldt, J. C., Liu, X., & Neumann, K. (2014). Framing students’ progression in understanding matter: A review of previous research. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.945829
- Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030462
- Hålland, B. (2010). Student teacher conceptions of matter and substances – evaporation and dew formation. Nordina, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.251
- Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461757
- Jaworski, B. (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-learners. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295–320). Springer Netherlands.
- Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
- Kahveci, A. (2009). Exploring chemistry teacher candidates’ profile characteristics, teaching attitudes and beliefs, and chemistry conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1039/B908248B
- Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009
- Kelly, M. (2005). The effects of increasing numbers of mature students on the pedagogical practices of lecturers in the institutes of technology. Irish Educational Studies, 24(2–3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323310500435497
- Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Education, 41(5), 432–448.
- Kirbulut, Z. D., & Beeth, M. E. (2013). Consistency of students’ ideas across evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9264-z
- Knowles, M., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner. The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th Ed.). Elsevier.
- Krnel, D., Watson, R., & Glazar, S. A. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of ‘matter’. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 257–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200302
- Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21022
- Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle schools’ students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300304
- Lehman, J. R., & McDonald, J. L. (1988). Teachers’ perceptions of the integration of mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 88(8), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1988.tb11868.x
- Lemma, A. (2013). A diagnostic assessment of eight grade students’ and their teachers’ misconceptions about basic chemical concepts. African Journal of Chemical Education, 3(1), 39–59.
- Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Prentice Hall, Inc.
- Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Boston College.
- McPhail, G. (2018). Curriculum integration in the senior secondary school: A case study in a national assessment context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1386234
- Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions on learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20006
- National LUMA Centre, Finland. https://www.luma.fi/en/centre /
- National STEM Learning Centre, University of York, UK. https://www.stem.org.uk /
- OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I) excellence and equity in education. PISA OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
- Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200905
- Papageorgious, G., & Sakka, D. (2000). Primary school teachers’ views on fundamental chemical concepts. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90025J
- Pine, K., Messer, D., & St. John, K. (2001). Children’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers’ views. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120046240
- Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (2005). Evidence-based practice in science education: The researcher–user interface. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500078036
- Rees, S., Kind, V., & Newton, D. (2018). Meeting the challenge of chemical language barriers in university level chemistry education. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 58(1-2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201880101
- Scali, R. M., Brownlow, S., & Hicks, J. L. (2000). Gender differences in spatial task performance as function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles, 43(5/6), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026699310308
- Sheehan, M., Childs, P. E., & Hayes, S. (2011). Pre-service Irish science teachers’ misconceptions in chemistry. In P. Clément, C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien, P. Dimitris, & R. M. Sperandeo (Eds.), Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 conference: Science learning and Citizenship ( Chap. 1, 1st ed.). European Science Education Research Association.
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
- Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., Rosbiono, M., Latip, A., & Sukardi, R. R. (2018). The courseware of discontinuous nature of matter in teaching the states of matter and their changes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1115a
- Sopandi, W., Latip, A., & Sujana, A. (2017). Prospective primary school teachers’ understanding on states of matter and their changes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012075
- Stavy, R. (1991). Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280404
- Stavy, R., & Stachel, D. (1985). Children’s ideas about ‘solid’ and ‘liquid’. European Journal of Science Education, 7(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070409
- Stofflet, R. T. (1999). Putting constructivist teaching into practice in undergraduate introductory science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2).
- Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2008). Gender differences in science: An expertise perspective. Educational International, 26(2), 146–169.
- Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 2(2), 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90014E
- Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10023
- Tatar, E. (2011). Prospective primary school teachers’ misconceptions about states of matter. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(2), 197–200.
- Treagust, D. F. (1986). Evaluating students’ misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple-choice items. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356835
- Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal in Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
- Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90026H
- Vosniadou, Stella. (2012). Reframing the classical approach to conceptual change:Preconceptions, misconceptions and synthetic methods. In Frazer, Tobin, & McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (Vol. 24, pp. 119–130). Springer.
- Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). Routledge.